WHOOPS! "Reminder: Mountain Biking Can Be Dangerous"

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:49:17 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:06:18 PM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 3:35:36 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:10:37 AM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote: Bullocks. It depends on where you go, how prepared you are, your skill level and what time of the year to name a few variables. For example, a 6 day solo off-track hike in fiordland national park in New Zealand during winter is way more dangerous than a 2km beginner trail at Rotorua in New Zealand. I know this well as i am an avivd hiker and mountain biker. Maybe you should think about your posts more before you write them? 1. You can't stop swearing -- a perfect sign that you have lost. 2. You can't stick to the subject. Backpacking has nothing to do with hiking. We are talking about trips that last under a day. It's obvious to everyone except mountain bikers (it's also obvious to them, but they don't have the guts to admit it) that mountain biking is an extreme sport and hiking is not. DUH! Nice try old man.

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:45:15 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:06:18 PM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 3:35:36 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:10:37 AM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote: Bullocks. It depends on where you go, how prepared you are, your skill level and what time of the year to name a few variables. For example, a 6 day solo off-track hike in fiordland national park in New Zealand during winter is way more dangerous than a 2km beginner trail at Rotorua in New Zealand. I know this well as i am an avivd hiker and mountain biker. Maybe you should think about your posts more before you write them? 1. You can't stop swearing -- a perfect sign that you have lost. 2. You can't stick to the subject. Backpacking has nothing to do with hiking. We are talking about trips that last under a day. It's obvious to everyone except mountain bikers (it's also obvious to them, but they don't have the guts to admit it) that mountain biking is an extreme sport and hiking is not. DUH! Nice try old man. What a pathetic and poorly thought out response. I can tell you are inexperienced when it comes to the outdoors. You are the only who is changing the subject to divert attention from your own ignorance.



The subject is the harm that mountain biking does. Stick to the subject. The newsgroup title is "alt.mountain-bike", not "Mike Vandeman". DUH! You refuse to stick to the subject, because you know you can't win there.

LOL. You are the one who changed the subject by claiming mountain biking is more dangerous than hiking. Come on Vandeman. Don't you have a better response?

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:49:17 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:06:18 PM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 3:35:36 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:10:37 AM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote: Bullocks. It depends on where you go, how prepared you are, your skill level and what time of the year to name a few variables. For example, a 6 day solo off-track hike in fiordland national park in New Zealand during winter is way more dangerous than a 2km beginner trail at Rotorua in New Zealand. I know this well as i am an avivd hiker and mountain biker. Maybe you should think about your posts more before you write them? 1. You can't stop swearing -- a perfect sign that you have lost. 2. You can't stick to the subject. Backpacking has nothing to do with hiking. We are talking about trips that last under a day. It's obvious to everyone except mountain bikers (it's also obvious to them, but they don't have the guts to admit it) that mountain biking is an extreme sport and hiking is not. DUH! Nice try old man.

The subject is the harm that mountain biking does. Stick to the subject. The newsgroup title is "alt.mountain-bike", not "Mike Vandeman". DUH! You refuse to stick to the subject, because you know you can't win there.

No Mike, the subject line of the thread is 'WHOOPS! "Reminder: Mountain Biking can be dangerous"' ... which YOU started and titled.

As has been pointed out, yes, it CAN be dangerous ... as can many other activities. It depends on the nature of the trip, the terrain, what you are doing etc etc etc.

So, your posts are completely and utterly pointless ... given that we all know that it CAN be dangerous and given that you're pulled this from a mountain biking website what was your point ? Do you think you should be entitled to legislate to stop us doing a 'dangerous' activity ? Or are you concerned about our welfare ???? :-)))))

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:18:11 AM UTC-7, Blackblade wrote:
The subject is the harm that mountain biking does. Stick to the subject.. The newsgroup title is "alt.mountain-bike", not "Mike Vandeman". DUH! You refuse to stick to the subject, because you know you can't win there.



No Mike, the subject line of the thread is 'WHOOPS! "Reminder: Mountain Biking can be dangerous"' ... which YOU started and titled.



As has been pointed out, yes, it CAN be dangerous ... as can many other activities. It depends on the nature of the trip, the terrain, what you are doing etc etc etc.



So, your posts are completely and utterly pointless ... given that we all know that it CAN be dangerous and given that you're pulled this from a mountain biking website what was your point ? Do you think you should be entitled to legislate to stop us doing a 'dangerous' activity ? Or are you concerned about our welfare ???? :-)))))

Both.

You ignored my key points once again old chum. You seem to be struggling.

You are entitled to do both Vandeman. Why? Your thoughts lack logic.

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:31:06 PM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:
You ignored my key points once again old chum. You seem to be struggling.

BS. You don't HAVE a valid point. Tell everyone what your real name is, and maybe an honest conversation can begin (on your part). Coward!

On Thursday, June 27, 2013 11:52:49 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:31:06 PM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:

You ignored my key points once again old chum. You seem to be struggling.



BS. You don't HAVE a valid point. Tell everyone what your real name is, and maybe an honest conversation can begin (on your part). Coward!

Jesus you seem very keen to know my name. Sorry Mike I don't want to date you as I am not homosexual. Have you considered a dating service?

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:34:36 PM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:
On Thursday, June 27, 2013 11:52:49 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:31:06 PM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote: You ignored my key points once again old chum. You seem to be struggling. BS. You don't HAVE a valid point. Tell everyone what your real name is, and maybe an honest conversation can begin (on your part). Coward! Jesus you seem very keen to know my name. Sorry Mike I don't want to date you as I am not homosexual. Have you considered a dating service?

I just want to see if you are man enough to give your real name. Obviously, you aren't, or you would have already done so. You are a thoroughgoing COWARD, and dishonest.