Mountain Biker Breaks Collarbone: Evolution at work!

On Apr 29, 10:26*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane

wrote:
On Apr 28, 12:32*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh
wrote:

A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic
variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally
discussed in terms of the other.

Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at
work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense.

Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A
poor animal had to die because of your supidity.

BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL
KNOW, LIAR.

Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them
out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER.

I never said that, as you well know, LIAR.


you God damned Liar...it is in the past posts. You stated directly you
"were needed more at home than in the war" and "my country thought I
would be better at home in college than in the war"...yeah...whatever
Chef...now you say you didn't say those statements. You lie. You
stated to a MTber this week..."I hope you break a leg"...you make
posts about people dying while cycling stating it is work in
progress...then you say you didn't say these things? You are a total
pyscho liar!

We all know a great deal about you. You lie...about flying, about
writing books, about your research studies...about having a website of
nothing but other's quotes and we could go on and on...

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:42:16 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:


I never said that, as you well know, LIAR.

You conveniently removed the statement that I was referring to -- a
sure sign of dishonesty.

you God damned Liar...it is in the past posts. You stated directly you
"were needed more at home than in the war" and "my country thought I
would be better at home in college than in the war"...yeah...whatever
Chef...now you say you didn't say those statements. You lie. You
stated to a MTber this week..."I hope you break a leg"

No, I didn't. You deliberately misquoted me. As usual. You are an
INCORRIGIBLE LIAR.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:15:20 GMT, "JP" wrote:


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
wrote:

On Apr 28, 12:32 am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh
wrote:

A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic
variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally
discussed in terms of the other.

Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at
work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense.

Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A
poor animal had to die because of your supidity.

BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL
KNOW, LIAR.


You let your cat run wild through a congested residential neighborhood
on a regular basis despite your being aware that cats threaten "wildlife"

No, I wasn't aware of that.

and there was frequent traffic.
You didn't live up to your responsibility as a citizen of your neighborhood
or as a pet owner.

It's not a cat owner's responsibility to keep their cat out of the
street. They have a right to a life. DUH.

Can't really face who you are, can you?


Umm.....

Laziness?
Cognitive dissonance?
Bad role modeling?
Denial?
Lying!


JP


--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
wrote:

On Apr 29, 10:26*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane

wrote:
On Apr 28, 12:32*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh
wrote:

A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic
variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally
discussed in terms of the other.

Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at
work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense.

Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A
poor animal had to die because of your supidity.

BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL
KNOW, LIAR.

Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them
out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER.

No, it would be irresponsible to confine a cat to an indoor life. You,
on the other hand, should be so confined, for society;s sake.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ...


You let your cat run wild through a congested residential neighborhood
on a regular basis despite your being aware that cats threaten "wildlife"

No, I wasn't aware of that.

Liar. You mention in his schmaltzy epilogue that you knew
cats preyed on birds and small animals. What are they? Domesticated?

and there was frequent traffic.
You didn't live up to your responsibility as a citizen of your neighborhood
or as a pet owner.

It's not a cat owner's responsibility to keep their cat out of the
street. They have a right to a life. DUH.

It is a pet owners responsibility to procide a safe and healthy environment for a pet.
They have a right to a life and if you get involved with one they have a right to expect
you to provide it. And if you choose to live in a city with an animal you have every
responsibility to keep it safe, and to keep the neighborhood wildlife safe, and to keep your
animal from roaming and spreading its **** crap and genetic code all over town.
You want to let your animal roam? Go live in the country.

Lazy-check
Bad role model -double check
Lying, Denying, Can't see what's in front of his eyes (cognitive dissonance)

You qualify for your own thesis.


One thing MV.
I like animals, have pets and I think your behavior and lack of responsibility
as regards your pet were reprehensible.
Your wacko trolling is harmless but your total refusal to accept your
role in the cat's death fully illustrates your lack of character
and your lack of humanity.

May you receive all that you deserve.

JP

On May 2, 12:59*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane





wrote:
On Apr 29, 10:26*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane

wrote:
On Apr 28, 12:32*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh
wrote:

A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic
variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally
discussed in terms of the other.

Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at
work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense.

Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A
poor animal had to die because of your supidity.

BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL
KNOW, LIAR.

Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them
out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER.

No, it would be irresponsible to confine a cat to an indoor life. You,
on the other hand, should be so confined, for society;s sake.

Then they should be free 24/7 but you CHOOSE to OWN them because you
are SELFISH.

On Apr 29, 12:59 pm, Siskuwihane wrote:
On Apr 29, 10:26 am, Mike Vandeman wrote:



On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane

wrote:
On Apr 28, 12:32 am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh
wrote:

A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic
variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally
discussed in terms of the other.

Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at
work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense.

Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A
poor animal had to die because of your supidity.

BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL
KNOW, LIAR.

Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them
out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER.

In many jurisdictions a cat at large is the same offense as a dog at
large. It might be prosecuted less often, but it's a reflection on
general safety and treating one's pets in a responsible manner.
"Having a life" and being treated in a responsible manner are not
directly connected. The one is a philosophical generality while the
other is a civic responsibility.

While one can never countervail any of Mikey's blither-blather, the
occasional post which educes said response provides a modicum of
amusement in slow times and jogs others' sensibilities as to Mikey's
near-total misanthropy.

PH

Here's a quick quiz we will never see answers to because Mike will
dodge again. The true answers are in caps. Of course those answers are
subject to change depending on Mike's Depakote dosages.

Did you fly or not? YES or no
Did you lie about me being a mtber? YES or no
Did you lie about other's occupations such as airline sources? YES or
no
Did you write a book? yes or NO
Did you tell people you walked to an airport that is not possible to
walk to in Australia? YES or no
Is your website entirely quotes from others? YES or no
Did you not say 'my country found me more valuable back home" in
response to hiding from the draft? YES or no
Are you the Swedish Chef from the muppets? yes or no
Did you not keep a good eye on your poor cat? yes or no and with this
question...cat's a detrimental to society when left outdoors and
unfixed due to the needless killing off of animals not in the cycle.
what kind of irresponsible fool would preach envirofriendly topics and
do the opposite behind closed doors? a dishonest one like you.
Do you not work for one of the worst companies that kill nature and
trees in the name of technology? YES or no

We could go on and on.

On Fri, 02 May 2008 21:53:13 GMT, "JP" wrote:





"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ...


You let your cat run wild through a congested residential neighborhood
on a regular basis despite your being aware that cats threaten "wildlife"

No, I wasn't aware of that.

Liar. You mention in his schmaltzy epilogue that you knew
cats preyed on birds and small animals.

"If I had known how many birds and other animals are killed by cats,
even well fed ones, I probably would never have chosen to adopt them."

What part of "if" don't you understand?

What are they? Domesticated?

and there was frequent traffic.
You didn't live up to your responsibility as a citizen of your neighborhood
or as a pet owner.

It's not a cat owner's responsibility to keep their cat out of the
street. They have a right to a life. DUH.

It is a pet owners responsibility to procide a safe and healthy environment for a pet.

No, no one can protect an animal from all possible hazards.

They have a right to a life and if you get involved with one they have a right to expect
you to provide it. And if you choose to live in a city with an animal you have every
responsibility to keep it safe, and to keep the neighborhood wildlife safe, and to keep your
animal from roaming and spreading its **** crap and genetic code all over town.
You want to let your animal roam? Go live in the country.

Lazy-check
Bad role model -double check
Lying, Denying, Can't see what's in front of his eyes (cognitive dissonance)

You qualify for your own thesis.


One thing MV.
I like animals, have pets

So you keep your cockroaches indoors at all times? Or on a leash?

and I think your behavior and lack of responsibility
as regards your pet were reprehensible.
Your wacko trolling is harmless but your total refusal to accept your
role in the cat's death fully illustrates your lack of character
and your lack of humanity.

May you receive all that you deserve.

Your threat is duly noted, hypocrite.

JP
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande