|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
I was looking at the Qld TORUM Regs and it seems that the definition of
what you must do when riding at night has changed since the days of the old Traffic Act. The new law says that "259. The rider of a bicycle ... must not ride at night ... unless the bicycle or device, or the rider, displays: (a) a flashing or steady white light that is clearly visible for at least 200m from the front of the bicycle or device; and (b) a flashing or steady red light that is clearly visible for at least 200 m from the rear of the bicycle or device" etc. So these days you can legally attach the light to your clothing, leg, arm, helmet or whatever, provided it can be seen for 200m. In the past you had to have it attached to your bike. P -- Peter McCallum Mackay Qld AUSTRALIA http://bicyclemackay.org.au |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
On 2006-06-08, Peter McCallum (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: I was looking at the Qld TORUM Regs and it seems that the definition of what you must do when riding at night has changed since the days of the old Traffic Act. The new law says that "259. The rider of a bicycle ... must not ride at night ... unless the bicycle or device, or the rider, displays: (a) a flashing or steady white light that is clearly visible for at least 200m from the front of the bicycle or device; and (b) a flashing or steady red light that is clearly visible for at least 200 m from the rear of the bicycle or device" etc. So these days you can legally attach the light to your clothing, leg, arm, helmet or whatever, provided it can be seen for 200m. In the past you had to have it attached to your bike. Cool. Mind you, the amount of otherwise clued people I have seen with a light that can't be seen 10m directly behind them because their 1) batteries have faded; 2) the light is crap; 3) the clothes have pointed their light in the wrong direction; 4) their clothes have developed a fold which completely obscures the light; and believe it or not 5) all of the above simultaneously... -- TimC "The application did not fail successfully because of an error" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
Peter McCallum wrote:
I was looking at the Qld TORUM Regs and it seems that the definition of what you must do when riding at night has changed since the days of the old Traffic Act. The new law says that "259. The rider of a bicycle ... must not ride at night ... unless the bicycle or device, or the rider, displays: (a) a flashing or steady white light that is clearly visible for at least 200m from the front of the bicycle or device; and (b) a flashing or steady red light that is clearly visible for at least 200 m from the rear of the bicycle or device" etc. So these days you can legally attach the light to your clothing, leg, arm, helmet or whatever, provided it can be seen for 200m. In the past you had to have it attached to your bike. P I would vastly prefer the lights to be attached to the bike. If fixed to the frame, they are not moving laterally or vertically, they are also pointed in the right direction all of the time, and thus have a much better chance of being seen. A light attached to your leg or helmet or anywhere else will inevitably be pointed all over the place. The law may say that, but I think fairly clearly good old common sense says otherwise. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
ray wrote: Peter McCallum wrote: I was looking at the Qld TORUM Regs and it seems that the definition of what you must do when riding at night has changed since the days of the old Traffic Act. The new law says that "259. The rider of a bicycle ... must not ride at night ... unless the bicycle or device, or the rider, displays: (a) a flashing or steady white light that is clearly visible for at least 200m from the front of the bicycle or device; and (b) a flashing or steady red light that is clearly visible for at least 200 m from the rear of the bicycle or device" etc. So these days you can legally attach the light to your clothing, leg, arm, helmet or whatever, provided it can be seen for 200m. In the past you had to have it attached to your bike. P I would vastly prefer the lights to be attached to the bike. If fixed to the frame, they are not moving laterally or vertically, they are also pointed in the right direction all of the time, and thus have a much better chance of being seen. A light attached to your leg or helmet or anywhere else will inevitably be pointed all over the place. The law may say that, but I think fairly clearly good old common sense says otherwise. A light attached to the light-mounting strip on my backpack is more visible than anywhere else on my compact frame, and it points in the right direction. The backpack doesn't move on my back much at all. I actually have a light on the seatpost, and a light on the seat stay as well. The light on the seat stay is off when I'm riding in a peloton. It's designed to shine up at car drivers and it's pretty full-on. The light on the seatpost ends up angled down a bit because of the compact geometry of my bike but it's okay for in a peloton - there is not enough space to mount a larger, adjustable angle flasher between the underseat bag and the frame. Tam |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
monsterman wrote:
I'm lit up like a christmas tree these days. Two red flashers on back of helmet, a strobing 10 bulb led flasher off the seat post, glow in the dark safety flashing ankle strap on the drivetrain side with abt 8 led flashers positioned around the strapping, 5 led flasher on the bars next to a 10w vistalite. I suspect I've been the source of more than one UFO sighting in recent weeks. And i still feel unsafe / unseen at times That leads me to one of the great mysteries of our time: why I suddenly become more visible when I don't tie my hair back in a plait or a ponytail, but instead leave it loose. I mean, what's with that? Suddenly no one gets into the argy-bargy with me - instead, drivers leave adequate room and they even wind their windows down at lights for a chat; pedestrians call out to cheer me on as I ride along the road. This mysterious transition is further amplified by the inclusion of my Sky Blue Kit. Theories? Tam |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
Tamyka Bell wrote: monsterman wrote: I'm lit up like a christmas tree these days. Two red flashers on back of helmet, a strobing 10 bulb led flasher off the seat post, glow in the dark safety flashing ankle strap on the drivetrain side with abt 8 led flashers positioned around the strapping, 5 led flasher on the bars next to a 10w vistalite. I suspect I've been the source of more than one UFO sighting in recent weeks. And i still feel unsafe / unseen at times That leads me to one of the great mysteries of our time: why I suddenly become more visible when I don't tie my hair back in a plait or a ponytail, but instead leave it loose. I mean, what's with that? Suddenly no one gets into the argy-bargy with me - instead, drivers leave adequate room and they even wind their windows down at lights for a chat; pedestrians call out to cheer me on as I ride along the road. This mysterious transition is further amplified by the inclusion of my Sky Blue Kit. Theories? Tam I'm sure it would be amplified further if you start riding around in a skirt! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
Tamyka Bell wrote:
That leads me to one of the great mysteries of our time: why I suddenly become more visible when I don't tie my hair back in a plait or a ponytail, but instead leave it loose. I mean, what's with that? Yobbos also wear ponytails, only girls wear their hair loose. Loose hair defines you as having tits, that's the attraction. :-) Theo |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
PHP code: -------------------- -------------------- Theo Bekkers Wrote: Yobbos also wear ponytails, only girls wear their hair loose. Loose hair defines you as having tits, that's the attraction. :-) Theo PHP code: -------------------- -------------------- you've just ruined TimC's day Theo -- monsterman |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
Tamyka Bell wrote:
monsterman wrote: I'm lit up like a christmas tree these days. Two red flashers on back of helmet, a strobing 10 bulb led flasher off the seat post, glow in the dark safety flashing ankle strap on the drivetrain side with abt 8 led flashers positioned around the strapping, 5 led flasher on the bars next to a 10w vistalite. I suspect I've been the source of more than one UFO sighting in recent weeks. And i still feel unsafe / unseen at times That leads me to one of the great mysteries of our time: why I suddenly become more visible when I don't tie my hair back in a plait or a ponytail, but instead leave it loose. I mean, what's with that? Suddenly no one gets into the argy-bargy with me - instead, drivers leave adequate room and they even wind their windows down at lights for a chat; pedestrians call out to cheer me on as I ride along the road. This mysterious transition is further amplified by the inclusion of my Sky Blue Kit. Theories? Tam Ummmm long hair == girl (maybe) girl alive is a better bet for scoring with for bloke in hoonmobile than girl dead Doesnt explain why the women are suddenly nice to you tho. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Lights: Do they need to be on the bike?
On 2006-06-08, Tamyka Bell (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: monsterman wrote: I'm lit up like a christmas tree these days. Two red flashers on back of helmet, a strobing 10 bulb led flasher off the seat post, glow in the dark safety flashing ankle strap on the drivetrain side with abt 8 led flashers positioned around the strapping, 5 led flasher on the bars next to a 10w vistalite. I suspect I've been the source of more than one UFO sighting in recent weeks. And i still feel unsafe / unseen at times That leads me to one of the great mysteries of our time: why I suddenly become more visible when I don't tie my hair back in a plait or a ponytail, but instead leave it loose. I mean, what's with that? Suddenly no one gets into the argy-bargy with me - instead, drivers leave adequate room and they even wind their windows down at lights for a chat; pedestrians call out to cheer me on as I ride along the road. This mysterious transition is further amplified by the inclusion of my Sky Blue Kit. Theories? I dunno, but do you reckon it will work for me? I've already had one arse grope. I gave back the best manly voice I could. -- TimC To define recursion, we must first define recursion. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
if you wanted maximum braking, where would you sit? | wle | Techniques | 133 | November 18th 15 02:10 AM |
The Ugly Bike | [email protected] | General | 4 | October 17th 05 02:43 PM |
The Bike Show | Danny Colyer | UK | 1 | July 7th 05 10:24 PM |
Bike lights - thank you and decision | marco007esq | Techniques | 6 | January 27th 05 05:50 PM |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |