|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Single speed recumbent
I had a taster today of what that might be like. Yesterday I had a few
problems with my rear indexing. This morning I found that whenever I tried to shift to a bigger sprocket, I couldn't shift as far as I wanted to. 3/4 mile from home I stopped to investigate and found that the cable had snapped, so I was stuck on the smallest sprocket. I had to decide then whether it was better to keep going or to head home and change bikes. I decided to keep going. With a fully functioning triple chainset I had a choice of 3 gears - 63", 95" or 118". With no serious downhills on my commute using the 118" gear was out of the question. Fortunately 63" is only just below the range of gear sizes that I usually use on the flat, so it was useable. I even used the 95" gear for about a mile. So, not too bad (wouldn't want to repeat it regularly), but it was bloody hard work starting off and getting up hills. I was surprised that I managed the hill up to the office, and even more surprised that I managed the climb out of the ring road underpass on the way home - 4mph, a 63" gear where I usually use a gear half that size. -- Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address) URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Danny Colyer wrote:
I had a taster today of what that might be like. Yesterday I had a few problems with my rear indexing. This morning I found that whenever I tried to shift to a bigger sprocket, I couldn't shift as far as I wanted to. 3/4 mile from home I stopped to investigate and found that the cable had snapped, so I was stuck on the smallest sprocket. With some derailleurs, you can use the limit screw to leave you stuck on the second smallest sprocket (assuming a suitable screwdriver or substitute). (I mention this in case anyone finds themself in the same situation and finds they don't manage it as well as you, not as a criticism.) Tying a knot in the broken cable to hold it in a lower gear is another possibility (a stopper knot near the end of a housing, or around the chainstay, or similar). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Braggins wrote:
With some derailleurs, you can use the limit screw to leave you stuck on the second smallest sprocket (assuming a suitable screwdriver or substitute). (I mention this in case anyone finds themself in the same situation and finds they don't manage it as well as you, not as a criticism.) I tried tightening the limit screw, but stopped when I realised that I wouldn't be able to get any further than the second smallest sprocket, which in this case would actually have been less useful than the smallest. Of course it would be a different matter on an upright bike, where you don't have 4' between the chainset and the sprockets and it's a bad idea to use the little ring with the smallest sprocket. Tying a knot in the broken cable to hold it in a lower gear is another possibility (a stopper knot near the end of a housing, or around the chainstay, or similar). I wish I'd thought of trying that. -- Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address) URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:38:59 +0000, Alan Braggins wrote:
Bob's suggestion of trapping it under a waterbottle bolt is probably less likely to slip in a way that leaves you constantly fiddling to stay adjusted properly. As he says, depends where it breaks though. But if you've got the tool to undo and retighten a bolt, surely you've also got the tool to use the limit-screws on the rear-clanger? Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:24:44 +0000, Danny Colyer
wrote: I had a taster today of what that might be like. Yesterday I had a few problems with my rear indexing. This morning I found that whenever I tried to shift to a bigger sprocket, I couldn't shift as far as I wanted to. 3/4 mile from home I stopped to investigate and found that the cable had snapped, so I was stuck on the smallest sprocket. Am I the only person around here that carries spare cables? 1 gear cable and 1 brake cable, both cut long enough for the rear? -- If, as Einstein said, space is curved and occupies ten dimensions including time; How can you be certain which is the underneath of a ladder? And how can you be certain you haven't already walked under one next week? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:57:58 GMT, Mike Causer
wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:38:59 +0000, Alan Braggins wrote: Bob's suggestion of trapping it under a waterbottle bolt is probably less likely to slip in a way that leaves you constantly fiddling to stay adjusted properly. As he says, depends where it breaks though. But if you've got the tool to undo and retighten a bolt, surely you've also got the tool to use the limit-screws on the rear-clanger? Am I the only person around here that carries spare cables? 1 gear cable and 1 brake cable, both cut long enough for the rear? -- If, as Einstein said, space is curved and occupies ten dimensions including time; How can you be certain which is the underneath of a ladder? And how can you be certain you haven't already walked under one next week? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Braggins wrote:
In article , Danny Colyer wrote: I had a taster today of what that might be like. Yesterday I had a few problems with my rear indexing. This morning I found that whenever I tried to shift to a bigger sprocket, I couldn't shift as far as I wanted to. 3/4 mile from home I stopped to investigate and found that the cable had snapped, so I was stuck on the smallest sprocket. With some derailleurs, you can use the limit screw to leave you stuck on the second smallest sprocket (assuming a suitable screwdriver or substitute). (I mention this in case anyone finds themself in the same situation and finds they don't manage it as well as you, not as a criticism.) Tying a knot in the broken cable to hold it in a lower gear is another possibility (a stopper knot near the end of a housing, or around the chainstay, or similar). Or jam a small stone in the derailleur parrallelogram to hold it at the right place. Worked for me once. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Bates wrote:
Am I the only person around here that carries spare cables? 1 gear cable and 1 brake cable, both cut long enough for the rear? No. There's at least two of us weirdos who come prepared for anything. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:57:58 GMT, Mike Causer
wrote: Bob's suggestion of trapping it under a waterbottle bolt is probably less likely to slip in a way that leaves you constantly fiddling to stay adjusted properly. As he says, depends where it breaks though. But if you've got the tool to undo and retighten a bolt, surely you've also got the tool to use the limit-screws on the rear-clanger? The limit screws don't actually give much useful adjustment. Using the limit screw the OP's derailleur would only hold the chain on the second smallest cog, still a pretty severe ratio. Trapping the cable (if it was long enough to allow this solution) would let you to choose any gear in the cluster. It only needs a single allen key tool as well, everyone carries allan keys, don't they? -- Email address is spam trapped, to reply directly remove the beverage. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Building a single speed trainer | Paul Richardson | Techniques | 2 | July 30th 04 09:14 PM |
Seven speed cassette single speed conversion | Me | UK | 2 | July 28th 04 03:58 PM |
Schwinn Grey Ghost single speed | Richard Rateick | Marketplace | 1 | April 3rd 04 06:46 PM |
Making Campagnolo 9/10 Speed Rear Hub/Cassette Compatible with Dura-Ace 7 Speed | rosco | Techniques | 6 | March 19th 04 04:47 AM |
[OT] Speeding motorist - "It's unfair" | Tim Woodall | UK | 95 | August 9th 03 09:28 AM |