|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Vandeman a fraud and professional failure
On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:58:00 GMT, Mike Vandeman
wrote: On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:14:47 -0700, "GaryG" wrote: .Mikey - you're the one making all these claims for expertise. Therefore, it .is incumbent upon you to establish your bona fides. I already did: Ph.D. And nothing since then? That was about 30 years ago. Real scientists continue to publish in peer-reviewed journals, and advance their knowledge with new information. Real scientists stay with their field of expertise, and do not spout off on every other topic with a claim of their PhD making them expert on that as well. How come more people do not get the Omni PhD (tm) like you did, making them expert in everything? Your PhD as used now seems to be nothing more than an attempt at intimidation. It certainly is not relevant to your crusade. You have gone from the statistical approach you apparently used for your PhD, to now just KNOWING the TRUTH about everything. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) -- At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 May 2005 17:01:33 GMT, Mike Vandeman
wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:40:35 -0300, "jtaylor" wrote: .The guy makes all these claims to be a scientist and he hasn't published .ANYTHING in a peer reviewed journal? I never claimed to be a scientist. DUH! Yes, you have. Many, many times. Anyone in the world could go to Google Groups, and look for messages from you with the words science or scientist. Plenty of PROOF there, in your own words, which I have not, cannot possibly filter or alter in any way. Were you LYING then, or are you LYING now? And what is throwing around a PhD supposed to mean in a completely unrelated field? Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) -- At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:27:21 -0400, pmhilton wrote:
jtaylor wrote: The guy makes all these claims to be a scientist and he hasn't published ANYTHING in a peer reviewed journal? Apparently not one single thing. Pete H If you look at the topic of his PhD dissertation, he did not exactly push forward the boundaries of human knowledge then, either. Food taste preferences of different ethnic groups? Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) -- At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gary S. wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:58:00 GMT, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:14:47 -0700, "GaryG" wrote: .Mikey - you're the one making all these claims for expertise. Therefore, it .is incumbent upon you to establish your bona fides. I already did: Ph.D. And nothing since then? That was about 30 years ago. Real scientists continue to publish in peer-reviewed journals, and advance their knowledge with new information. Real scientists stay with their field of expertise, and do not spout off on every other topic with a claim of their PhD making them expert on that as well. How come more people do not get the Omni PhD (tm) like you did, making them expert in everything? Your PhD as used now seems to be nothing more than an attempt at intimidation. It certainly is not relevant to your crusade. You have gone from the statistical approach you apparently used for your PhD, to now just KNOWING the TRUTH about everything. This is exactly why I do not believe Mr Vandeman has a Ph.D in psychology. Statistics is the basis of most psychology, especially at the time Mr V. was supposedly studying when behaviourist psychology was at the fore. Anyone who had studied psychology to the level Mr V. claims to have done would live and breathe the accepted statistical practices and methods of interpretation. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gary S. wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:27:21 -0400, pmhilton wrote: jtaylor wrote: The guy makes all these claims to be a scientist and he hasn't published ANYTHING in a peer reviewed journal? Apparently not one single thing. Pete H If you look at the topic of his PhD dissertation, he did not exactly push forward the boundaries of human knowledge then, either. Food taste preferences of different ethnic groups? But has anyone actually verified that Mr V. really did this study and actually does hold a Ph.D? In psychology? I'm further surprised that this would even be considered a valid topic for a Ph.D in psychology. I suppose if the focus was on how culture influences taste preference then this could be a social science issue but it's still on the very borders of psychology. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"BarryNL" wrote in message ... ? But has anyone actually verified that Mr V. really did this study and actually does hold a Ph.D? In psychology? I'm further surprised that this would even be considered a valid topic for a Ph.D in psychology. I suppose if the focus was on how culture influences taste preference then this could be a social science issue but it's still on the very borders of psychology. PhD = Phucking Dork, (Mike's only degree) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 15 May 2005 00:19:35 +0200, BarryNL
wrote: Gary S. wrote: If you look at the topic of his PhD dissertation, he did not exactly push forward the boundaries of human knowledge then, either. Food taste preferences of different ethnic groups? But has anyone actually verified that Mr V. really did this study and actually does hold a Ph.D? In psychology? I'm further surprised that this would even be considered a valid topic for a Ph.D in psychology. I suppose if the focus was on how culture influences taste preference then this could be a social science issue but it's still on the very borders of psychology. This has been looked up before by several people as incredulous as you are, that a PhD would be awarded to such a person with such poor scientific reasoning. Vandeman, Michael Joseph, 1943- Highest degree: PhD in psychology, 1973 Degree granted by: University of California at Los Angeles PhD DISSERTATION, at UCLA "Chemical description of food taste preferences among Black-, Japanese-, and Mexican-Americans derived by means of nonmetric multidimensional scaling". But he has worked for a number of years as a Systems Analyst for PacBell. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) -- At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary S." Idontwantspam@net wrote in message ... On Sun, 15 May 2005 00:19:35 +0200, BarryNL wrote: Gary S. wrote: Vandeman, Michael Joseph, 1943- Highest degree: PhD in psychology, 1973 Degree granted by: University of California at Los Angeles PhD DISSERTATION, at UCLA "Chemical description of food taste preferences among Black-, Japanese-, and Mexican-Americans derived by means of nonmetric multidimensional scaling". Looks like another professional student to avoid the Vietnam Draft, just stay in school long enough until they had to give him some kind of degree. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 May 2005 20:24:08 GMT, Gary S. Idontwantspam@net wrote:
..On Sat, 14 May 2005 17:01:33 GMT, Mike Vandeman ..wrote: .. ..On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:40:35 -0300, "jtaylor" wrote: .. ...The guy makes all these claims to be a scientist and he hasn't published ...ANYTHING in a peer reviewed journal? .. ..I never claimed to be a scientist. DUH! .. ..Yes, you have. Many, many times. .. ..Anyone in the world could go to Google Groups, and look for messages ..from you with the words science or scientist. Plenty of PROOF there, ..in your own words, which I have not, cannot possibly filter or alter ..in any way. But somehow you are incapable of providing even ONE instance, proving you a LIAR. ..Were you LYING then, or are you LYING now? .. ..And what is throwing around a PhD supposed to mean in a completely ..unrelated field? Psychology is VERY relevant to mountain biking addiction. DUH! ..Happy trails, ..Gary (net.yogi.bear) === I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 May 2005 20:18:32 GMT, Gary S. Idontwantspam@net wrote:
..On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:58:00 GMT, Mike Vandeman ..wrote: .. ..On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:14:47 -0700, "GaryG" wrote: .. ...Mikey - you're the one making all these claims for expertise. Therefore, it ...is incumbent upon you to establish your bona fides. .. ..I already did: Ph.D. .. ..And nothing since then? That was about 30 years ago. Real scientists ..continue to publish in peer-reviewed journals, and advance their ..knowledge with new information. Real scientists stay with their field ..of expertise, and do not spout off on every other topic with a claim ..of their PhD making them expert on that as well. What do YOU know about "real scientists"? Don't make us laugh. ..How come more people do not get the Omni PhD (tm) like you did, making ..them expert in everything? .. ..Your PhD as used now seems to be nothing more than an attempt at ..intimidation. It certainly is not relevant to your crusade. .. ..You have gone from the statistical approach you apparently used for ..your PhD, to now just KNOWING the TRUTH about everything. .. ..Happy trails, ..Gary (net.yogi.bear) === I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vandeman a fraud and professional failure | di | Social Issues | 3 | May 14th 05 11:05 PM |