#11
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On Dec 17, 10:25 pm, OccasionalFlyer wrote:
I'm shopping for a new road bike, with better components than the twenty-year-old 105 components on my Trek 2100. The main bikes in the price range I'm aiming for include a Trek Madone, Cannondale Synapse or Supersix, or Cervelo (like an R3). I'm having trouble with finding a bike that fits. Cannondale and Cervelo both seem to have frame sizes of 51 and 54 but nothing in-between. My current road bike is 52cm and that feels right. I've tried both the 51' with the seat raised and the 54' with the seat lowered. The person at the bike store who worked with me didn't really seem able to say, "You can tell if it's the right frame size if..." You can tell if it's the right frame size if it doesn't feel wrong when you ride it. Ride. Feel. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On 19/12/11 08:37, Dan O wrote:
On Dec 17, 10:25 pm, wrote: I'm shopping for a new road bike, with better components than the twenty-year-old 105 components on my Trek 2100. The main bikes in the price range I'm aiming for include a Trek Madone, Cannondale Synapse or Supersix, or Cervelo (like an R3). I'm having trouble with finding a bike that fits. Cannondale and Cervelo both seem to have frame sizes of 51 and 54 but nothing in-between. My current road bike is 52cm and that feels right. I've tried both the 51' with the seat raised and the 54' with the seat lowered. The person at the bike store who worked with me didn't really seem able to say, "You can tell if it's the right frame size if..." You can tell if it's the right frame size if it doesn't feel wrong when you ride it. Ride. Feel. Lee: That's it! How did it feel? [Student thinks; Lee smacks his head] Lee: Don't think. FEEL. It's like a finger pointing at the moon. [Looks at student who is looking at the finger; smacks student again] Lee: Do not concentrate on the finger or you will miss all of the heavenly glory! [Student bows; Lee smacks him again] Lee: Never take your eyes off your opponent... even when you're bowing! [Student bows again this time keeping his eyes on Lee] Lee: That's better. [student walks away; opening credits begin] Bruce Lee, "Enter the Dragon" -- JS. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On Dec 18, 6:49*pm, damyth wrote:
On 12/18/2011 09:25 AM, Ron Ruff wrote: Like others have said, you need to determine the contact points coordinates of your current bike relative to the bottom bracket, and make sure you can replicate this on the new bike. This is assuming that you don't want them to change. If you do (or might in the future) want them to change, then make sure you can accommodate that. Stem lengths are readily available from 80-130mm and have different amounts of rise, handlebars have varying amounts of reach as well, and seatposts have varying setback. It isn't hard to make a wide range of sizes fit perfectly. Based on the frame size, I'm probably around the same height as the OP. * I don't want to make a mountain of a molehill but I find it's pretty difficult to fit people when frames sizes are =52cm. Fitting is one thing. *Getting a great ride is another. *I've pretty much come to the conclusion with 700c wheels (front and back) too many compromises must be made for small frames/riders. Use shorter cranks. 1/5 inside leg or 1/2 femur length at maximum. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On 19/12/11 11:15, thirty-six wrote:
On Dec 18, 6:49 pm, wrote: On 12/18/2011 09:25 AM, Ron Ruff wrote: Like others have said, you need to determine the contact points coordinates of your current bike relative to the bottom bracket, and make sure you can replicate this on the new bike. This is assuming that you don't want them to change. If you do (or might in the future) want them to change, then make sure you can accommodate that. Stem lengths are readily available from 80-130mm and have different amounts of rise, handlebars have varying amounts of reach as well, and seatposts have varying setback. It isn't hard to make a wide range of sizes fit perfectly. Based on the frame size, I'm probably around the same height as the OP. I don't want to make a mountain of a molehill but I find it's pretty difficult to fit people when frames sizes are=52cm. Fitting is one thing. Getting a great ride is another. I've pretty much come to the conclusion with 700c wheels (front and back) too many compromises must be made for small frames/riders. Use shorter cranks. 1/5 inside leg or 1/2 femur length at maximum. I tried to measure my femur. Not sure how accurate, but I got about 45cm. From the lump at the top just out from my hip, to the lump at the outside of my knee. Wow, that means I could ride a 225mm crank! This seems a little more useful... http://www.53x12.com/do/show?page=article&id=59 -- JS. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On Dec 18, 7:04*am, Duane Hebert wrote:
On 12/18/2011 1:25 AM, OccasionalFlyer wrote: I'm shopping for a new road bike, with better components than the twenty-year-old 105 components on my Trek 2100. *The main bikes in the price range I'm aiming for include a Trek Madone, Cannondale Synapse or Supersix, or Cervelo (like an R3). *I'm having trouble with finding a bike that fits. Cannondale and Cervelo both seem to have frame sizes of 51 and 54 but nothing in-between. My current road bike is 52cm and that feels right. *I've tried both the 51' with the seat raised and the 54' with the seat lowered. *The person at the bike store who worked with me didn't really seem able to say, "You can tell if it's the right frame size if..." *The 54' is too tall, even with the seat lowered, while the 51' feels a bit too cramped. *I know that comfort (since I'm not trying to race any more) is important but there are multiple adjustments that could be made, like stem height, to make the right sized frame feel more comfortable. *Is there any good technique beyond standing over the top tube and assessing how much space there is between the bike and the rider to determine if I'm choosing the right frame size? *There are probably bike shops where I could get more help with this but I haven't found any yet in my area (Pasadena to Pomona in LA county, southern California). *Any suggestions? Thanks. Ken Specialized Tarmac comes in 49, 52 and 54. *Probably similar to the Trek or Cervelo that you are considering. *May be worth a look.- Hide quoted text - Madones come in 52 and 54cm, and the Cannondale SuperSix comes in a 52. It's not a whole lot more than the Synapse, depending on component package. The Synapse jumps from 51 to 54cm. I think in that frame size, there is not going to be a huge difference in ride charactertistic. -- Jay Beattie. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On Dec 19, 12:28*am, James wrote:
On 19/12/11 11:15, thirty-six wrote: On Dec 18, 6:49 pm, *wrote: On 12/18/2011 09:25 AM, Ron Ruff wrote: Like others have said, you need to determine the contact points coordinates of your current bike relative to the bottom bracket, and make sure you can replicate this on the new bike. This is assuming that you don't want them to change. If you do (or might in the future) want them to change, then make sure you can accommodate that. Stem lengths are readily available from 80-130mm and have different amounts of rise, handlebars have varying amounts of reach as well, and seatposts have varying setback. It isn't hard to make a wide range of sizes fit perfectly. Based on the frame size, I'm probably around the same height as the OP.. * *I don't want to make a mountain of a molehill but I find it's pretty difficult to fit people when frames sizes are=52cm. Fitting is one thing. *Getting a great ride is another. *I've pretty much come to the conclusion with 700c wheels (front and back) too many compromises must be made for small frames/riders. Use shorter cranks. *1/5 inside leg or 1/2 femur length at maximum. I tried to measure my femur. *Not sure how accurate, but I got about 45cm. *From the lump at the top just out from my hip, to the lump at the outside of my knee. *Wow, that means I could ride a 225mm crank! Oh ********. My memory's playing tricks. It's half of something (I think) This seems a little more useful... http://www.53x12.com/do/show?page=article&id=59 -- JS. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On 12/18/2011 1:25 AM, OccasionalFlyer wrote:
I'm shopping for a new road bike, with better components than the twenty-year-old 105 components on my Trek 2100. The main bikes in the price range I'm aiming for include a Trek Madone, Cannondale Synapse or Supersix, or Cervelo (like an R3). I'm having trouble with finding a bike that fits. Cannondale and Cervelo both seem to have frame sizes of 51 and 54 but nothing in-between. My current road bike is 52cm and that feels right. I've tried both the 51' with the seat raised and the 54' with the seat lowered. The person at the bike store who worked with me didn't really seem able to say, "You can tell if it's the right frame size if..." The 54' is too tall, even with the seat lowered, while the 51' feels a bit too cramped. I know that comfort (since I'm not trying to race any more) is important but there are multiple adjustments that could be made, like stem height, to make the right sized frame feel more comfortable. Is there any good technique beyond standing over the top tube and assessing how much space there is between the bike and the rider to determine if I'm choosing the right frame size? There are probably bike shops where I could get more help with this but I haven't found any yet in my area (Pasadena to Pomona in LA county, southern California). Any suggestions? Thanks. Ken Read, if you haven't, Sheldon Brown's article: http://sheldonbrown.com/frame-sizing.html I agree with him that the critical dimension is top tube length. You can tweak that a little with stem length, but too much can affect handling and weight distribution. When we ride less aggressively, we generally want higher bars and a shallower seat tube angle. The saddle position should be used to tweak effective seat tube angle, not to adjust cockpit length. If you have unusual body proportions, like long torso and short legs, finding the ideal top tube and seat tube proportional lengths may be difficult in a stock frame. It's very difficult to decide if a bike is a good fit based on a short ride, more so if you're very accustomed to a particular geometry. Anything different is going to feel strange. The thing that's difficult to know is whether you'll like it better after the initial strangeness wears off. I find that using a trainer for a relatively long spin allows you to concentrate just on the bike fit. I typically spend a couple of hours on a trainer when setting up a new bike, tweaking bar & saddle height, saddle setback, swapping out stems and even handlebars and even bar and lever rotational positions, until I get that feeling of perfect balance on the bike. Be picky, don't succumb to new bike fever, lest you suffer buyer's remorse forever. If you're sure you like your current fit and don't want to change anything, then take measurements and see if you can duplicate them without compromising with unusual tweaks, otherwise pick a different bike or go custom. That's the first question to answer, whether you want a change in geometry. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On 12/18/2011 4:37 PM, Dan O wrote:
On Dec 17, 10:25 pm, wrote: I'm shopping for a new road bike, with better components than the twenty-year-old 105 components on my Trek 2100. The main bikes in the price range I'm aiming for include a Trek Madone, Cannondale Synapse or Supersix, or Cervelo (like an R3). I'm having trouble with finding a bike that fits. Cannondale and Cervelo both seem to have frame sizes of 51 and 54 but nothing in-between. My current road bike is 52cm and that feels right. I've tried both the 51' with the seat raised and the 54' with the seat lowered. The person at the bike store who worked with me didn't really seem able to say, "You can tell if it's the right frame size if..." You can tell if it's the right frame size if it doesn't feel wrong when you ride it. Ride. Feel. I think that you find out if a bike fits you after about the 110th kilometer. A few kilometers may tell you that the frame size is close but a setup on a trainer with a good fit guy should be part of the deal. Especially when you're spending thousands for a bike. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Road bike fit
On Dec 19, 6:32*am, Peter Cole wrote:
On 12/18/2011 1:25 AM, OccasionalFlyer wrote: I'm shopping for a new road bike, with better components than the twenty-year-old 105 components on my Trek 2100. *The main bikes in the price range I'm aiming for include a Trek Madone, Cannondale Synapse or Supersix, or Cervelo (like an R3). *I'm having trouble with finding a bike that fits. Cannondale and Cervelo both seem to have frame sizes of 51 and 54 but nothing in-between. My current road bike is 52cm and that feels right. *I've tried both the 51' with the seat raised and the 54' with the seat lowered. *The person at the bike store who worked with me didn't really seem able to say, "You can tell if it's the right frame size if..." *The 54' is too tall, even with the seat lowered, while the 51' feels a bit too cramped. *I know that comfort (since I'm not trying to race any more) is important but there are multiple adjustments that could be made, like stem height, to make the right sized frame feel more comfortable. *Is there any good technique beyond standing over the top tube and assessing how much space there is between the bike and the rider to determine if I'm choosing the right frame size? *There are probably bike shops where I could get more help with this but I haven't found any yet in my area (Pasadena to Pomona in LA county, southern California). *Any suggestions? Thanks. Ken Read, if you haven't, Sheldon Brown's article:http://sheldonbrown.com/frame-sizing.html I agree with him that the critical dimension is top tube length. You can tweak that a little with stem length, but too much can affect handling and weight distribution. When we ride less aggressively, we generally want higher bars and a shallower seat tube angle. The saddle position should be used to tweak effective seat tube angle, not to adjust cockpit length. If you have unusual body proportions, like long torso and short legs, finding the ideal top tube and seat tube proportional lengths may be difficult in a stock frame. It's very difficult to decide if a bike is a good fit based on a short ride, more so if you're very accustomed to a particular geometry. Anything different is going to feel strange. The thing that's difficult to know is whether you'll like it better after the initial strangeness wears off. I find that using a trainer for a relatively long spin allows you to concentrate just on the bike fit. I typically spend a couple of hours on a trainer when setting up a new bike, tweaking bar & saddle height, saddle setback, swapping out stems and even handlebars and even bar and lever rotational positions, until I get that feeling of perfect balance on the bike. Be picky, don't succumb to new bike fever, lest you suffer buyer's remorse forever. If you're sure you like your current fit and don't want to change anything, then take measurements and see if you can duplicate them without compromising with unusual tweaks, otherwise pick a different bike or go custom. That's the first question to answer, whether you want a change in geometry. Wise advice. Also, why not upgrade the current bike if it fits? If you do your own work, a newish 105 groupset is $500, but well under $1K if you pay retail and let your LBS swap things out. Custom is a good option. If you're not racing, the pound or two advantage of CFRP traded for fit is a bad choice. Around here, Andy at Homegrown Bicycles could hook you up with a frame and color for under $1500 last I checked. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instant Review: eggbeaters on a road bike with road shoes | TimC | Australia | 11 | September 30th 07 11:31 AM |
Bike mag's road test satire of road tests | [email protected][_2_] | Techniques | 0 | May 15th 07 11:06 PM |
road bike / race bike / hybrid / touring / fitness bike - CHOSEN AND BOUGHT | Maurice Wibblington | UK | 26 | September 27th 06 11:56 AM |
Looking for new road bike - standard road bike or comfort - suggestions? | Mike | General | 11 | March 2nd 04 08:45 PM |
track fork on road bike w/ road bike geom.? | JB | Techniques | 6 | December 27th 03 10:21 PM |