|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
On Aug 2, 6:25*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Aug 2, 1:51*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Aug 2, 1:30*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:32:04 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 31, 5:57*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 31, 10:55*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:17:46 GMT, "M. Halliwell" templetagteam@shawdotca wrote: Mike Vandeman wrote: Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have "studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so forth. I'm sure the regulating bodies in California would love to hear that (don't proclaim it too loudly, Mike). Yes. Assessing mountain biking impacts doesn't require any credentials. What are your qualifications in conservation biology? Your claim of being an engineer is noted. Please be advised that engineering is a regulated field and claiming such without adequate qualifications and certification can open you to censure by the state regulating body. BS. Show me where I claimed to be an engineer. First thing I said Mike: "Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have "studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so forth."...your first answer: "Yes." Perhaps you need to be a little more clear with your use of the english language? NO. It's obvious that I didn't mean a professional. You twisted my statement to mean that. But what else could we expect from a MOUNTAIN BIKER????? Michael J. Vandeman is an armchair environmentalist. He does no actual hands-on research himself so his "findings" are bogus. So a "review of the literature" isn't science? That would come a big news to all scientists. No more than a review of the new Batman movie. Your "reviews" are on par with Roger Ebert, nothing more than opinion. *He has been proven wrong hundreds of times. BS. Not by any real SCIENTIST. None of the SCIENTISTS who have heard me speak have found anything wrong with my papers on mountain biking. I'm sure your papers were just fine for whiping asses when they restroom was out of toilet paper, but in the real world, ALL your claims have been refuted and proven false by REAL research. How would YOU know? You can't even SPELL, much less judge scientific quality. My misspelling of the word "wiping" doesn't negate your lack of qualifications, but you "probaby" knew that. Sorry that your claims about mountain-bikng were debunked by real researchers, LIAR. Name even ONE "real researcher" who has "debunked" my claims. I know you can't. You are nothing but hot air. Wilson and Seney debunked you years ago. That's an OBVIOUS LIE! Their article was published before mine! Their so-called "erosion study" was pure hokum, and they have NEVER responded to my critique or email -- obviously because I'm RIGHT! And NOT ONE of the SCIENTISTS who have heard or received my paper has ever found anythng wrong with it. You are full of it. I notice that you didn't respond, when I asked you to state your qualifications -- because you don't HAVE any! anythng?? Direct me to the site that has the results of YOUR actual field tests, not some armchair research you did. Are you surprised they didn't respond to you? No doubt they would have responded to someone who was qualified to question them, not some Environmental Dear Abby. *You tried to refute their findings with opinion but you never did anything real to back it up, as usual. Your keyboard research is a farce. It's obvious that you have no idea what you are talking about. You are just blowing how air, like ALL mountain bikers. But I'm not a mountain-biker, stop LYING, I know that's hard for you to do. Thanks for a good laugh, FRAUD! But what can we expect from someone afraid to use their real name?! Unless we see your field studies, you are the true fraud. |
Ads |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:57:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
wrote: On Aug 2, 6:25*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Aug 2, 1:51*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Aug 2, 1:30*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:32:04 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 31, 5:57*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 31, 10:55*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:17:46 GMT, "M. Halliwell" templetagteam@shawdotca wrote: Mike Vandeman wrote: Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have "studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so forth. I'm sure the regulating bodies in California would love to hear that (don't proclaim it too loudly, Mike). Yes. Assessing mountain biking impacts doesn't require any credentials. What are your qualifications in conservation biology? Your claim of being an engineer is noted. Please be advised that engineering is a regulated field and claiming such without adequate qualifications and certification can open you to censure by the state regulating body. BS. Show me where I claimed to be an engineer. First thing I said Mike: "Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have "studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so forth."...your first answer: "Yes." Perhaps you need to be a little more clear with your use of the english language? NO. It's obvious that I didn't mean a professional. You twisted my statement to mean that. But what else could we expect from a MOUNTAIN BIKER????? Michael J. Vandeman is an armchair environmentalist. He does no actual hands-on research himself so his "findings" are bogus. So a "review of the literature" isn't science? That would come a big news to all scientists. No more than a review of the new Batman movie. Your "reviews" are on par with Roger Ebert, nothing more than opinion. *He has been proven wrong hundreds of times. BS. Not by any real SCIENTIST. None of the SCIENTISTS who have heard me speak have found anything wrong with my papers on mountain biking. I'm sure your papers were just fine for whiping asses when they restroom was out of toilet paper, but in the real world, ALL your claims have been refuted and proven false by REAL research. How would YOU know? You can't even SPELL, much less judge scientific quality. My misspelling of the word "wiping" doesn't negate your lack of qualifications, but you "probaby" knew that. Sorry that your claims about mountain-bikng were debunked by real researchers, LIAR. Name even ONE "real researcher" who has "debunked" my claims. I know you can't. You are nothing but hot air. Wilson and Seney debunked you years ago. That's an OBVIOUS LIE! Their article was published before mine! Their so-called "erosion study" was pure hokum, and they have NEVER responded to my critique or email -- obviously because I'm RIGHT! And NOT ONE of the SCIENTISTS who have heard or received my paper has ever found anythng wrong with it. You are full of it. I notice that you didn't respond, when I asked you to state your qualifications -- because you don't HAVE any! Answer the question. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
On Aug 2, 11:02*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:57:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Aug 2, 6:25*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Aug 2, 1:51*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Aug 2, 1:30*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:32:04 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 31, 5:57*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 31, 10:55*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:17:46 GMT, "M. Halliwell" templetagteam@shawdotca wrote: Mike Vandeman wrote: Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have "studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so forth. I'm sure the regulating bodies in California would love to hear that (don't proclaim it too loudly, Mike). Yes. Assessing mountain biking impacts doesn't require any credentials. What are your qualifications in conservation biology? Your claim of being an engineer is noted. Please be advised that engineering is a regulated field and claiming such without adequate qualifications and certification can open you to censure by the state regulating body. BS. Show me where I claimed to be an engineer. First thing I said Mike: "Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have "studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so forth."...your first answer: "Yes." Perhaps you need to be a little more clear with your use of the english language? NO. It's obvious that I didn't mean a professional. You twisted my statement to mean that. But what else could we expect from a MOUNTAIN BIKER????? Michael J. Vandeman is an armchair environmentalist. He does no actual hands-on research himself so his "findings" are bogus. So a "review of the literature" isn't science? That would come a big news to all scientists. No more than a review of the new Batman movie. Your "reviews" are on par with Roger Ebert, nothing more than opinion. *He has been proven wrong hundreds of times. BS. Not by any real SCIENTIST. None of the SCIENTISTS who have heard me speak have found anything wrong with my papers on mountain biking. I'm sure your papers were just fine for whiping asses when they restroom was out of toilet paper, but in the real world, ALL your claims have been refuted and proven false by REAL research. How would YOU know? You can't even SPELL, much less judge scientific quality. My misspelling of the word "wiping" doesn't negate your lack of qualifications, but you "probaby" knew that. Sorry that your claims about mountain-bikng were debunked by real researchers, LIAR. Name even ONE "real researcher" who has "debunked" my claims. I know you can't. You are nothing but hot air. Wilson and Seney debunked you years ago. That's an OBVIOUS LIE! Their article was published before mine! Their so-called "erosion study" was pure hokum, and they have NEVER responded to my critique or email -- obviously because I'm RIGHT! And NOT ONE of the SCIENTISTS who have heard or received my paper has ever found anythng wrong with it. You are full of it. I notice that you didn't respond, when I asked you to state your qualifications -- because you don't HAVE any! Answer the question. Why do you fly on commercial airlines? |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 06:34:53 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
wrote: Sorry that your claims about mountain-bikng were debunked by real researchers, LIAR. Name even ONE "real researcher" who has "debunked" my claims. I know you can't. You are nothing but hot air. Wilson and Seney debunked you years ago. That's an OBVIOUS LIE! Their article was published before mine! Their so-called "erosion study" was pure hokum, and they have NEVER responded to my critique or email -- obviously because I'm RIGHT! And NOT ONE of the SCIENTISTS who have heard or received my paper has ever found anythng wrong with it. You are full of it. I notice that you didn't respond, when I asked you to state your qualifications -- because you don't HAVE any! Answer the question. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
On Aug 3, 12:39*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 06:34:53 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: Sorry that your claims about mountain-bikng were debunked by real researchers, LIAR. Name even ONE "real researcher" who has "debunked" my claims. I know you can't. You are nothing but hot air. Wilson and Seney debunked you years ago. That's an OBVIOUS LIE! Their article was published before mine! Their so-called "erosion study" was pure hokum, and they have NEVER responded to my critique or email -- obviously because I'm RIGHT! And NOT ONE of the SCIENTISTS who have heard or received my paper has ever found anythng wrong with it. You are full of it. I notice that you didn't respond, when I asked you to state your qualifications -- because you don't HAVE any! Answer the question. You've never answered any of mine, but now you expect me to answer to you? In the words of Michael J. Vandeman, "Do your own research". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Bikers Rat Pack & Threaten Woman for Telling the Truth about Mountain Biking! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 2 | April 2nd 08 05:12 PM |
Mountain Bikers Rat Pack & Threaten Woman for Telling the Truth about Mountain Biking! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 2 | April 2nd 08 05:12 PM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 8 | March 18th 07 07:24 AM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 6 | March 16th 07 04:35 AM |
STILL Unrefuted, after15 Months of Mountain Bikers Fuming!: The Impacts of Mountain Biking on Wildlife and People -- A Review of the Literature | di | Mountain Biking | 1 | October 23rd 05 10:09 PM |