#111
|
|||
|
|||
Dan Volker wrote:
SNIIIIIP Dan V Dewd, you really have an unhealthy preoccupation with JD, it's time to move on. Rich "hooked on bills one liners" |
Ads |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:50:18 +1000, ireman_1 wrote:
I think we all realize not all ballers are *******s, but there are enough to spoil the barrel I guess. "ballers"? :-0 Its like any other group - the few who are making all the noise are the ones we all hear about. Most guys are just playing the sport because its fun. I really don't think it taught them much about managing confrontation off the field, partly because most were such dolts at it. -- -BB- To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail address, at least) |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Dan, you make my brain hurt.
On 2004-08-19, Dan Volker penned: If you played highschool football, you learned that if you shove someone, you are going to get shoved back--and what it feels like. You will know all about planning to hit someone, and expecting to be hit. The nerd on the chess club--as the flip side, does not experience physical retaliation for his attacks, and without this as a consequence, and without experiencing the crushing physical impacts, he has a flawed view of "consequences" in a confrontation. He can make threats, and fear only words coming back at him. That little quote just goes to show how clueless you are about nerd life. Nerds experience physical retaliation for their attacks, whether the attacks were physical or not. In fact, nerds get the added bonus of experiencing physical retaliation when they didn't do anything at all! I don't tend to "push" someone I don't know to the point of wanting to fight....The chess club nerd may not have any idea where this line is, or what the ramifications would be if a fight ensued. Moreover, they do not see words as leading to a fight, whereas in real life, the words they would use "would" lead to a fight. This is the dysfunction--the talk that goes way over the line, meaning they expect no consequences, because in all their life, they never run into situations where consequences exist. Again, where do you get off thinking that non-jocks don't get into fights and that they don't get hit? Lemme throw one out there for ya. And I won't skimp on the stereotypes, since you keep droning on about the "chess club nerd." Maybe a muscle-bound oaf needs a lesson in getting beat down before he figures out that violence begets violence. Nerds are smart enough to extrapolate from their experiences and figure these things out without ever having to pick a fight! I know this comes as a shocker to you, but not everyone has to put their hand in front of a flamethrower to figure out that fire burns! In AMB, as long as someone like JD is tolerated by the group, he gets to talk his talk without consequences. Killfiling him is basically tolerating him. If 40 people slammed him every time he made an unprovoked attack, this would either take up so much of his time in responding that it would be negative reinforcement, or he would at least be more likely to see himself as a butthead. This begs the question---"Does MV see himself as a butthead?" and the answer would be no, since he's a sick, neurotic ******* that makes JD look like a role model. Sick people like MV are a case entirely separate, and ignoring him would seem to be the only solution. Dan, the impression you've given everyone throughout this discussion is that *you're* the bully, not JD. You've done this by citing examples from your own life. The mental model of the world that you've divulged is so simplistic and flawed that it hurts me to realize that maybe you actually believe what you're saying. You've made it clear that you live in a world of might makes right, and it's pretty clear which side you've been on. As for your laughable claim that JD would be stymied by having everyone slam him whenever he attacks someone -- just how naive are you? I've seen forums where this sort of approach has been attempted. It just drags everyone into massive, never-ending flame fests. It's *much* better to ignore a troll than to try to make him see the light. And again, not everyone agrees about who is trolling whom. Let me put this in simple terms: You're damaging your reputation on this newsgroup with every post. The sooner you stop whining about what a dick JD is, the sooner everyone will forget about it and go on with business as usual. And believe me, I speak from experience on this one. -- monique "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." -- Mark Twain |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
"cc" wrote in message ...
"JD" wrote in message om... "cc" wrote in message ... "JD" wrote in message m... "cc" wrote in message ... See previous post. Bikes were attached properly. Problem=design flaw. Yeah, blame it on a "design flaw". You're funny. Well, each bike was attached at a different time, by different people, yet both were coming off. The design incorporates a lot of "bounce" due to the hinge feature that allows fold-down for SUV hatchbacks. We'd double-checked installation to ensure that it had been done correctly as well. This is the first time this particular rack had been on the freeway. The rack bounced the bikes right off the end . . cc Hmmm, every non-egghead I know who uses a rack like that backs up the fastening system with straps or bungees. Now go back to your books. You are such a jackass, JD. Only you (or MV) could judge someone solely by their email address. Grow up. That's a very white flag you've got there. Did you use bleach on it? JD |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Monique tries to get Dan to see the light with:
It's *much* better to ignore a troll than to try to make him see the light. Monique, don't make me pull out the flashlight. -- T o m "Tossing an easy one to Sorni" Dillon Lakewood, CO Z to S to email |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Dan V says:
In AMB, as long as someone like JD is tolerated by the group, he gets to talk his talk without consequences. Killfiling him is basically tolerating him. I think this statement should have a big "Whoooossshhhhhhh...." attached to it. ;-) JD has been an integral and appreciated part of this group (except for his tutu habit) foir many years. A number of folks here ride with him regularly, and many have dropped in to sample his hospitality and have reported favourably on it. You, OTOH, are a relative newbie who has picke da fight and doesn't seem to know how to back down gracefully. There are examples of strategic withdrawals strewn throughout this group. If If 40 people slammed him every time he made an unprovoked attack, this would either take up so much of his time in responding that it would be negative reinforcement, or he would at least be more likely to see himself as a butthead. Except that it seems to be you who are being the butthead here. And 40 people do slam you when you say silly things. Are we getting through to you on this one? Steve |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
On 19 Aug 2004 21:28:02 GMT, Stephen Baker wrote:
You, OTOH, are a relative newbie who has picke da fight Is that Italian? ;-) Are we getting through to you on this one? Oh, I hope not. He's much more entertaining the way he is. -- -BB- To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail address, at least) |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Dan V says:
And you're not going to know until you or someone you trust actually runs into me in person. Since you are obviously not going to come and meet any of us of your own volition...... |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
"JD" wrote in message om... "cc" wrote in message ... "JD" wrote in message om... "cc" wrote in message ... "JD" wrote in message m... "cc" wrote in message ... See previous post. Bikes were attached properly. Problem=design flaw. You are such a jackass, JD. Only you (or MV) could judge someone solely by their email address. Grow up. That's a very white flag you've got there. Did you use bleach on it? I'm sorry, is this a contest or something? I don't come to usenet to 'win' arguments. The only reason I entered this thread was because I think it's weak when people are discouraged from offering their opinion by the antagonizing comments of others, such as yourself or MV. If you think it's cool to "say whatever, whenever" then you would respect that, as I do. And for the record -- I really do respect honesty, but part of becoming an adult is realizing that it's not acceptable to personally attack others, especially when unprovoked. There is a distinct difference between telling it how you think it is, and telling someone they are a worthless moron for thinking differently. It seems to make you happy, insulting people you don't know, using archaic stereotypes and grade-school taunts. Whatever, man. As Monique correctly pointed out, noone is going to change you, especially not me. I have, however, grown weary of responding to this thread. *Plonk* cc |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Man, let it go. JD and his butt-sniffing groupies are much more childish
than you. They can go on for weeks with all this. Go ride! I like Trek bikes man, MTB and Road. Everyone likes what they ride, if it's working for ya, beat the hell out of it until the time for a new one comes along. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2004 - Trek 1400? Trek 1200? comments? | yuri budilov | Techniques | 1 | April 4th 04 10:53 PM |
Klein vs. Trek (crossposted) | Lester Long | Techniques | 9 | September 29th 03 06:47 PM |
FA: TREK Aluminum Investment Cast Lugs & Tubing | The Ink Company | Marketplace | 0 | September 8th 03 01:08 AM |