Ullrich gets 2 year ban - Pantani is next!

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has issued a two-year ban for Jan
Ullrich, to run from August 22, 2011. In addition, all his results
from May 2005 until his retirement in February 2007 are annulled,
including his third-place overall finish in the 2005 Tour de France.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/jan-...r-ban-from-cas

Lindsay a écrit profondement:

| The Court of Arbitration for Sport has issued a two-year ban for Jan
| Ullrich, to run from August 22, 2011. In addition, all his results
| from May 2005 until his retirement in February 2007 are annulled,
| including his third-place overall finish in the 2005 Tour de France.

| http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/jan-...r-ban-from-cas

Followed by VDB

--
Davey Crockett
Flying the Flag of the English
The Flag of Hengest and Horsa
http://azurservers.com:7080/rbr/englishdragon.jpg

Lindsay a écrit profondement:
| The Court of Arbitration for Sport has issued a two-year ban for Jan
| Ullrich, to run from August 22, 2011. In addition, all his results
| from May 2005 until his retirement in February 2007 are annulled,
| including his third-place overall finish in the 2005 Tour de France.

Davey Crockett wrote:
Followed by VDB

The vampires will follow you beyond the grave.

On Feb 10, 2:37*pm, Simply Fred wrote:
Followed by VDB

The vampires will follow you beyond the grave.

what's the penalty if you can't get yourself above-ground to be
available for a blood sample?

In article
,
" wrote:

On Feb 10, 2:37Â*pm, Simply Fred wrote:
Followed by VDB

The vampires will follow you beyond the grave.

what's the penalty if you can't get yourself above-ground to be
available for a blood sample?

They dig up your remains and try them in front of CAS,
where they sweeten the room with your presence.

--
Old Fritz

On Feb 14, 6:10*am, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article
,

" wrote:
On Feb 10, 2:37*pm, Simply Fred wrote:
Followed by VDB

The vampires will follow you beyond the grave.

what's the penalty if you can't get yourself above-ground to be
available for a blood sample?

They dig up your remains and try them in front of CAS,
where they sweeten the room with your presence.

--
Old Fritz

Here's another point against the UCI. In the Ullrich case, they asked
for a lifetime ban for a multiple offence, which the CAS refused as
the other offense was non-sporting related. Since that CAS decision
clearly follows the rules, it implies that the UCI has taken the role
of prosecutor in trying to obtain the maximum sanction possible.
However, that is not the UCI's role: as the governing body of cycling
its function is to represent everyone, including the riders.

Once again, this shows that current anti-doping practice has become an
inquisition.

-ilan

ilan wrote:
Here's another point against the UCI. In the Ullrich case, they asked
for a lifetime ban for a multiple offence, which the CAS refused as
the other offense was non-sporting related. Since that CAS decision
clearly follows the rules, it implies that the UCI has taken the role
of prosecutor in trying to obtain the maximum sanction possible.
However, that is not the UCI's role: as the governing body of cycling
its function is to represent everyone, including the riders.

Once again, this shows that current anti-doping practice has become an
inquisition.

Inquisiting Minds Want To Know!

-S-

On 15/02/2012 14:44, Steve Freides wrote:
ilan wrote:
Here's another point against the UCI. In the Ullrich case, they asked
for a lifetime ban for a multiple offence, which the CAS refused as
the other offense was non-sporting related. Since that CAS decision
clearly follows the rules, it implies that the UCI has taken the role
of prosecutor in trying to obtain the maximum sanction possible.
However, that is not the UCI's role: as the governing body of cycling
its function is to represent everyone, including the riders.

Once again, this shows that current anti-doping practice has become an
inquisition.

Inquisiting Minds Want To Know!

Shouldn't that be 'inquisitivious'?

--

On Feb 15, 10:30*am, atriage wrote:
On 15/02/2012 14:44, Steve Freides wrote: ilan wrote:
Here's another point against the UCI. In the Ullrich case, they asked
for a lifetime ban for a multiple offence, which the CAS refused as
the other offense was non-sporting related. Since that CAS decision
clearly follows the rules, it implies that the UCI has taken the role
of prosecutor in trying to obtain the maximum sanction possible.
However, that is not the UCI's role: as the governing body of cycling
its function is to represent everyone, including the riders.

Once again, this shows that current anti-doping practice has become an
inquisition.

Inquisiting Minds Want To Know!

Shouldn't that be 'inquisitivious'?

--

say that ten times- fast

I hope they nail that little elephants ass to the wall. If he doesn't
watch his step he could end up dead from all of that doping.