Cyclist scum

On 22/01/2017 21:59, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 21:55:38 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 21:30:20 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 8:49:51 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Utter scum, as are ALL cyclists.

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/...-gang-12489921


What do you expect from 'people' who are from Liverpool.

Cyclists are all the same. **** people.

Not sure how lives were put in danger as the article claimed, or
what
laws were being broken.

Bait not taken.

Can't you think what law was broken? You have just lost the
argument, to a CYCLIST!

I did not bite.
You are too stupid to see the offered bait.
What a fool you are Mr Hucker.

It is not bait. The kids were not breaking the law.

What?

Of course they were.

Town Police Clauses Act 1847, Section 28, for a start.

And that adoptive Act, I can assure you, is still in force in the City
of Liverpool.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/10-11/89

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:34:10 -0000, JNugent wrote:

On 22/01/2017 21:59, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 21:55:38 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 21:30:20 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 8:49:51 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Utter scum, as are ALL cyclists.

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/...-gang-12489921


What do you expect from 'people' who are from Liverpool.

Cyclists are all the same. **** people.

Not sure how lives were put in danger as the article claimed, or
what
laws were being broken.

Bait not taken.

Can't you think what law was broken? You have just lost the
argument, to a CYCLIST!

I did not bite.
You are too stupid to see the offered bait.
What a fool you are Mr Hucker.

It is not bait. The kids were not breaking the law.

What?

Of course they were.

Town Police Clauses Act 1847, Section 28, for a start.

And that adoptive Act, I can assure you, is still in force in the City
of Liverpool.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/10-11/89

Skimming through pages and pages of waffle, I saw something about causing obstructions in streets. Is that what you're getting at? In which case anyone cycling (or driving) slower than everyone else is an obstruction and breaking the law. Pity they're not, then I could actually drive around without waiting behind slow folk all the time.

--
If breasts had no nipples, they'd be pointless.