![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hmm. Just bought a cycling helmet for my last short tour which encompassed quite a bit of city cycling. Never wore one before : don't think I will again. The added noise and irritation that the helment causes more than offsets the "possible" help it gives in case of a spill by deducting from my usual spacial awareness. I don't know. I still refuse to believe that the helmet won't help in a spill, but wonder if the %chance of it helping offsets the % increase in likelihood of an accident due to lower awareness levels. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 May 2004 10:32:56 +0200, Walter Mitty wrote:
Hmm. Just bought a cycling helmet for my last short tour which encompassed quite a bit of city cycling. Never wore one before : don't think I will again. The added noise and irritation that the helment causes more than offsets the "possible" help it gives in case of a spill by deducting from my usual spacial awareness. I don't know. I still refuse to believe that the helmet won't help in a spill, but wonder if the %chance of it helping offsets the % increase in likelihood of an accident due to lower awareness levels. When our Mandatory Helmet Law came in in 1994 I complied, even though I was dubious. (Very few data then, just a lot of handwringing and 'it will save costs in the long run --') I also thought the helmet would detract from road and traffic awareness, hearing etc. I found actually that my hearing was enhanced, so that I often thought a car was behind me where there wasn't one. (Perhaps "distorted" is a better word). Statistics about whether helmets help in the overall scheme of things seem to be very confused and contradictory, which is probably just another way of saying that helmets have a very minor part to play in overall safety of bicycling. However, they make fertile fodder for yet another "Helmet war"!!! And you are right, they are very uncomfortable and irritating. So I would like the mandatory law repealed and leave it up to the individual, and encourage measures for bicycling safety which really work. Peter -- This transmission is certified free of viruses as no Microsoft products were used in its preparation or propagation. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My first helmet , in 1982, was bulky and un-comfortable. So it spent
all of its time on the top shelf in the closet. One afternoon in 1987 I'm out tearing around the hilly part of my favorite loop when my front tire hit a small rock. This upset the bike just enough to spill me over to the side at 18 mph. I landed on my head, followed by elbow, shoulder, and thigh. The guys that helped me out were alarmed at the amount of blood coming from my head and my in-coherence. Seems that when my head hit the pavement, my hair tore some skin away from my scalp, and the ER doc described "darning" it back together with sutures. Funny how the memory of getting gravel picked out of my head , along with other details is still vivid 17 years later. My current helmet is light and far more comfortable than was available 22 years ago. I don't leave home without it. When I wear a winter hat under it (on those cooold rides!) I lose quite a bit of my awareness, otherwise I don't even notice it. Derek |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walter Mitty wrote:
:: Hmm. Just bought a cycling helmet for my last short tour which :: encompassed quite a bit of city cycling. Never wore one before : :: don't think I will again. :: :: The added noise and irritation that the helment causes more than :: offsets the "possible" help it gives in case of a spill by deducting :: from my usual spacial awareness. What noise and irritation? Regardless of any merits about safety, I find my helmet comfortable. If I ride without it, I feel as though I'm not wearing my seatbelt. :: :: I don't know. I still refuse to believe that the helmet won't help :: in a spill, but wonder if the %chance of it helping offsets the % :: increase in likelihood of an accident due to lower awareness levels. Surely you can imagine the sitaution in a spill were a helmet might help. Even if it won't save my life in a full head collision with the road, I'll take what little protection it does offer. Given all the riding I plan to do my options seem limited. 1) come away dead, 2) come away extremely messed up, 3) come away with some skin removed and some stuff broken. So if my helmet helps with situation 3, I'll be happy. In either of the other two options, the helmet thing will be a moot point. Plus, it looks cool....bicycle peacock thing.....IMO. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Walter Mitty" wrote in message ... Hmm. Just bought a cycling helmet for my last short tour which encompassed quite a bit of city cycling. Never wore one before : don't think I will again. Geez, now you did it. :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Keller wrote:
When our Mandatory Helmet Law came in in 1994 I complied, even though I was dubious. (Very few data then, just a lot of handwringing and 'it will save costs in the long run --') I also thought the helmet would detract from road and traffic awareness, hearing etc. I found actually that my hearing was enhanced, so that I often thought a car was behind me where there wasn't one. (Perhaps "distorted" is a better word). Most certainly is distorted! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The added noise and irritation that the helment causes more than offsets
the "possible" help it gives in case of a spill by deducting from my usual spacial awareness. I don't seem to have that problem. Of course, after wearing my helmet so routinely, I barely notice it even with it on. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 May 2004 10:32:56 +0200, Walter Mitty wrote:
Hmm. Just bought a cycling helmet for my last short tour which encompassed quite a bit of city cycling. Never wore one before : don't think I will again. The added noise and irritation that the helment causes more than offsets the "possible" help it gives in case of a spill by deducting from my usual spacial awareness. I don't know. I still refuse to believe that the helmet won't help in a spill, but wonder if the %chance of it helping offsets the % increase in likelihood of an accident due to lower awareness levels. I've walked away from two accidents because of cheap, but effective $20 Bell helmets, and I've also had a hundred facial stitches and dental reconstruction because I didn't wear one... Fit is everything, I've got a huge melon and the cheap Bells actually fit me the best. I don't even feel like I'm wearing anything, and they keep the rain off of my glasses, the sun off of my shaved skull, and best of all redirect the sweat from my eyes. Fit fit fit! ![]() should "disappear" after a couple minutes of use. Make sure it sits low enough in front and you don't wear it like a bloody yarmulke. ![]() I do think those old "leather hairnets" looked a hell of a lot cooler though! ![]() It's your choice certainly--I often do go helmetless for a short jaunts and I'm aware of the risks, but do try out a few more lids. btw, I'm not really accident prone--just put in a lot of urban miles and a lot of night miles (with full lights, but still...) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 May 2004 10:32:56 +0200, Walter Mitty
wrote: I don't know. I still refuse to believe that the helmet won't help in a spill, but wonder if the %chance of it helping offsets the % increase in likelihood of an accident due to lower awareness levels. I wear my bike helmet for one reason only. It's black, and it seems to scare the peds on the bike trail when I come zipping by. (I'm thinking of adding viking horns). -B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bicycle helmet law can save lives | Garrison Hilliard | General | 146 | May 19th 04 05:42 AM |
How Do You Know if a Helmet Fits? | Elisa Francesca Roselli | General | 11 | April 24th 04 09:14 PM |
A Pleasant Helmet Debate | Stephen Harding | General | 12 | February 26th 04 06:32 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
How I cracked my helmet | Rick Warner | General | 2 | July 12th 03 11:26 AM |