#1
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
From my industry magazine this morning. Letters are not
published online so I took the initiative: http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfr...t/1802lett.jpg I do not know the writer, but he's perspicacious and ("Advocacy Industrial Complex") pithy. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
AMuzi wrote:
From my industry magazine this morning. Letters are not published online so I took the initiative: http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfr...t/1802lett.jpg I knew it! It is the car industry's fault! Ha ha ha -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
On 1/30/2018 8:35 PM, AMuzi wrote:
From my industry magazine this morning. Letters are not published online so I took the initiative: http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfr...t/1802lett.jpg I do not know the writer, but he's perspicacious and ("Advocacy Industrial Complex") pithy. Very well said. But LAB's going to kick him out of the "Bicycle Friendly Business" club. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
On 2018-01-30 17:35, AMuzi wrote:
From my industry magazine this morning. Letters are not published online so I took the initiative: http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfr...t/1802lett.jpg I do not know the writer, but he's perspicacious and ("Advocacy Industrial Complex") pithy. He is wrong in some statements. Infrastructure can increase ridership, big time. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/30/n...commuting.html We just have to recognize that Americans are, as the author says, a bit lazy when it comes to actually using muscles for propulsion. So we'll never be able to achive Dutch or Danish mode share numbers. Is the infrastructure worth it if the mode share then goes from 0.1% to 1.5%? My opinion is yes. I try a lot convincing people to ride. Almost every single time the answer is "Oh no, I am not going to ride Green Valley Road!" even though that has a reasonable shoulder most of the time. When I tell them about a backroads way to get to the bike trail network in the valley or about the long singletrack that crosses town yet isn't even on Google Maps their attitude changes. Many have then gone on rides with me and with at least three of them the bug caught on to the point where they bought more decent bikes. The notion that E-commerce isn't the problem is also incorrect. Example: One of my riding buddies bought one MTB at a local bike shop. It was a previous-year model so it sold for a serious discount. He bought another four (!) MTBs online. Plus loads of tires, chains, cassettes et cetera. Same with me. Yes, I bought the MTB and the road bike at bike shops. However, the last time I bought something at a bike shop was about two years ago and I wear through a lot of bike stuff. I am simply not willing to, for example, pay $17 for a pair of measly organic brake pads when I can get a pair of much better motorcycle-quality pads for $2 mail-order from Asia, including shipping. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
Joerg wrote:
He is wrong in some statements. Infrastructure can increase ridership, big time. I didn't understand any of it. First it was the car industry PR guys to blame, then it was Hollywood, then the elite guys being on dope, then it was Americans being plain fat and lazy (chicken-or-egg situation anyway), then it was defaitism just carry on only don't expect to be rich doing it. But "bike retailers" don't get rich here either - salary a month is somewhere between a nurse and a school teacher. Thanks for the scan anyway. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
On 2018-01-31 11:03, Emanuel Berg wrote:
Joerg wrote: He is wrong in some statements. Infrastructure can increase ridership, big time. I didn't understand any of it. First it was the car industry PR guys to blame, then it was Hollywood, then the elite guys being on dope, then it was Americans being plain fat and lazy (chicken-or-egg situation anyway), then it was defaitism just carry on only don't expect to be rich doing it. But "bike retailers" don't get rich here either - salary a month is somewhere between a nurse and a school teacher. Nurses in the US often make more money than engineers and teachers get a fat retirement package, courtesy of the taxpayer. The way to really foster cycling is simple: Provide bike paths and trails. Yesterday I took the singletrack to Placerville about 12mi east of here. Still pretty muddy from the rains. I felt like a kid again, got all dirty. Fun! You can also go west on that singletrack for hours. When at the local trailhead I found this new bike shop: https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/...4aae05fff73191 He plans to offer locker rentals so you can leave a bike at the trailhead and then go there by bus or car. I always ride straight from home but that would be a really smart move. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
On Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 7:55:50 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote:
On 2018-01-31 11:03, Emanuel Berg wrote: Joerg wrote: He is wrong in some statements. Infrastructure can increase ridership, big time. I didn't understand any of it. First it was the car industry PR guys to blame, then it was Hollywood, then the elite guys being on dope, then it was Americans being plain fat and lazy (chicken-or-egg situation anyway), then it was defaitism just carry on only don't expect to be rich doing it. But "bike retailers" don't get rich here either - salary a month is somewhere between a nurse and a school teacher. Nurses in the US often make more money than engineers and teachers get a fat retirement package, courtesy of the taxpayer. The way to really foster cycling is simple: Provide bike paths and trails. Yesterday I took the singletrack to Placerville about 12mi east of here. Still pretty muddy from the rains. I felt like a kid again, got all dirty. Fun! You can also go west on that singletrack for hours. When at the local trailhead I found this new bike shop: https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/...4aae05fff73191 He plans to offer locker rentals so you can leave a bike at the trailhead and then go there by bus or car. I always ride straight from home but that would be a really smart move. How about sunshine and a desire to ride. https://bikeportland.org/2011/06/22/...r-photos-55300 Not a single-track trail in sight. If we're talking about selling bikes as transportation, most people do not want to ride to work on muddy trails. They want to ride to work, the store or wherever on pavement. I rode to work this morning dodging other cyclists on ordinary roads, and in fact, roads with no shoulders that were bicycle-less (except for me) thirty years ago. No special facilities. Lots of people on bikes -- and like me, they were avoiding the supposedly wonderful separate bicycle facility, which is a nightmare notwithstanding the press. Fake news! https://bikeportland.org/2015/08/14/...et-bike-155284 The best bang for the buck from a planning standpoint are bike lanes and adequate education of drivers so they know that bike lanes are really lanes. Alternately, adequate shoulders or traffic calmed streets. I don't like most physically separated facilities with some minor exceptions, but those are generally linear parks and not inner-city commute routes. -- Jay Beattie. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
jbeattie wrote:
Not a single-track trail in sight. If we're talking about selling bikes as transportation, most people do not want to ride to work on muddy trails. They want to ride to work, the store or wherever on pavement. Bike infrastructure sure helps but if people dont go by bike to begin with it may be a shot in the dark anyway. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
On 2018-02-01 13:07, jbeattie wrote:
On Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 7:55:50 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2018-01-31 11:03, Emanuel Berg wrote: Joerg wrote: He is wrong in some statements. Infrastructure can increase ridership, big time. I didn't understand any of it. First it was the car industry PR guys to blame, then it was Hollywood, then the elite guys being on dope, then it was Americans being plain fat and lazy (chicken-or-egg situation anyway), then it was defaitism just carry on only don't expect to be rich doing it. But "bike retailers" don't get rich here either - salary a month is somewhere between a nurse and a school teacher. Nurses in the US often make more money than engineers and teachers get a fat retirement package, courtesy of the taxpayer. The way to really foster cycling is simple: Provide bike paths and trails. Yesterday I took the singletrack to Placerville about 12mi east of here. Still pretty muddy from the rains. I felt like a kid again, got all dirty. Fun! You can also go west on that singletrack for hours. When at the local trailhead I found this new bike shop: https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/...4aae05fff73191 He plans to offer locker rentals so you can leave a bike at the trailhead and then go there by bus or car. I always ride straight from home but that would be a really smart move. How about sunshine and a desire to ride. https://bikeportland.org/2011/06/22/...r-photos-55300 Not a single-track trail in sight. If we're talking about selling bikes as transportation, most people do not want to ride to work on muddy trails. Out here they do. Last time I was at Intel I was surprised that about 90% of the bikes parked there were MTB. Mostly dated ones with visible wear. Many of them with fairly bald rear tires, probably from too much pavement riding. I can't remember any day since about a week after I bought it new where my MTB did not carry copious amounts of caked mud. ... They want to ride to work, the store or wherever on pavement. Pavement is no fun. My favorite stretch when using the MTB to run errands in the valley: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44zqIKf2T_I I rode to work this morning dodging other cyclists on ordinary roads, and in fact, roads with no shoulders that were bicycle-less (except for me) thirty years ago. No special facilities. Lots of people on bikes -- and like me, they were avoiding the supposedly wonderful separate bicycle facility, which is a nightmare notwithstanding the press. Fake news! https://bikeportland.org/2015/08/14/...et-bike-155284 The best bang for the buck from a planning standpoint are bike lanes and adequate education of drivers so they know that bike lanes are really lanes. Alternately, adequate shoulders or traffic calmed streets. I'll take those. What I don't like is fast roads without any shoulder. Yesterday on the way to the singletrack a delivery van almost side-swiped my at 50mph. ... I don't like most physically separated facilities with some minor exceptions, but those are generally linear parks and not inner-city commute routes. I don't care whether they are called "linear parks" or whatever. If built for cycling at reasonable speed I'll take those any day over a road. Like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-3gnLIUum0 Best of all, no posted speed limits. They just re-paved the whole thing. No idea why since it was still smooth enough. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
letter to editor
Joerg wrote:
On 2018-02-01 13:07, jbeattie wrote: .... They want to ride to work, the store or wherever on pavement. Pavement is no fun. It takes skill as well as a strong faith, Giorgio! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxKURy2yE64 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NYT\Letter to the Editor: The Cyclists and the Police | Jym Dyer | Social Issues | 0 | August 13th 08 06:01 PM |
Another letter to the editor | Claire Petersky | General | 32 | May 9th 06 04:17 PM |
Another letter to the editor | Edward Dolan | Recumbent Biking | 5 | May 9th 06 04:17 PM |
Letter to the editor | Claire Petersky | General | 20 | April 16th 06 03:11 AM |
Letter to the Editor | Peter B | UK | 18 | August 18th 03 12:57 PM |