Nice mount for home made lights.

I found a 'good design'
(http://www.hyperactive.oz.nf/Lights4/Luxeon4.htm) for mounting
Luxeons. It's a simple but neat design.


--
Treadly

On 04/05/06 at 21:44:55 Treadly somehow managed to type:


I found a 'good design'
(http://www.hyperactive.oz.nf/Lights4/Luxeon4.htm) for mounting
Luxeons. It's a simple but neat design.

I've seen that one before - pretty neat. BUT. Last night while I was
looking around for Luxeon lighting ideas [1] I stumbled across this
http://www.pilom.com/BicycleElectronics/LEDhead.htm

[1] For the last month or so I've been messing around with PIC micros
for another purpose and spotted a bike light thing spread over two
issues of Silicon Chip mag - Apr and May 06 [3]. It's vastly
over-the-top for straight bike lights what with a charging circuit,
more "modes" than you can shake a stick at, need two of 'em (front and
rear) etc. so I figured that I'd rat their design and make actual bike
lights, front and rear drivers in one unit.

For tail lights I reckon a couple of red 1W Luxeons - one flashing, one
steady (mounted as far apart as possible) should do the job. For
headlights I figured a 3W white luxeon for "low" beam and a 5W jobbie
for "high" beam and both the 3W and 5W Luxeons on for a "super high"
beam. All managed and driven by a PIC micro to get the last bit of
usable charge from a power source of between about 5 and about 16 volts.

Thoughts anyone.

[2] http://www.microchip.com/

[3] http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_106372/article.html

The question for Suzyj - or anyone else come to that. Do you have any
recomendations for PCB layout software ? GPL for preference but cheap
will do if it has to...:-) Linux, doze or even OpenVMS is fine.

--
Humbug

Humbug Wrote:
On 04/05/06 at 21:44:55 Treadly somehow managed to type:


I found a 'good design'
(http://www.hyperactive.oz.nf/Lights4/Luxeon4.htm) for mounting
Luxeons. It's a simple but neat design.

I've seen that one before - pretty neat. BUT. Last night while I was
looking around for Luxeon lighting ideas [1] I stumbled across this
http://www.pilom.com/BicycleElectronics/LEDhead.htm

[1] For the last month or so I've been messing around with PIC micros
for another purpose and spotted a bike light thing spread over two
issues of Silicon Chip mag - Apr and May 06 [3]. It's vastly
over-the-top for straight bike lights what with a charging circuit,
more "modes" than you can shake a stick at, need two of 'em (front and
rear) etc. so I figured that I'd rat their design and make actual bike
lights, front and rear drivers in one unit.

For tail lights I reckon a couple of red 1W Luxeons - one flashing,
one
steady (mounted as far apart as possible) should do the job. For
headlights I figured a 3W white luxeon for "low" beam and a 5W jobbie
for "high" beam and both the 3W and 5W Luxeons on for a "super high"
beam. All managed and driven by a PIC micro to get the last bit of
usable charge from a power source of between about 5 and about 16
volts.

Thoughts anyone.

[2] http://www.microchip.com/

[3] http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_106372/article.html

The question for Suzyj - or anyone else come to that. Do you have any
recomendations for PCB layout software ? GPL for preference but cheap
will do if it has to...:-) Linux, doze or even OpenVMS is fine.

--
HumbugThe problem with the Silicon Chip one is that not only is the design
over the top, but the reliability of the circuit board too. The Luxeon
pucks are sealed and I've only ever had one fail was when I connected
the power up to it reverse polarity. I NEED reliability.


--
Treadly

Humbug Wrote:
On 04/05/06 at 21:44:55 Treadly somehow managed to type:


I found a 'good design'
(http://www.hyperactive.oz.nf/Lights4/Luxeon4.htm) for mounting
Luxeons. It's a simple but neat design.
I've been using reflector brackets for my homemade lights. They're
pretty adaptable. Another sort of bracket I've used for rack mounting
and map holder mounting is one that I got from a marine supply place
(Elizabeth St, Mel). They're for mounting things to railings on boats
so they can do a fair range of diameters. Strong nylon and two screws.
About $9 a pair.

I've seen that one before - pretty neat. BUT. Last night while I was
looking around for Luxeon lighting ideas [1] I stumbled across this
http://www.pilom.com/BicycleElectronics/LEDhead.htm

[1] For the last month or so I've been messing around with PIC micros
for another purpose and spotted a bike light thing spread over two
issues of Silicon Chip mag - Apr and May 06 [3]. It's vastly
over-the-top for straight bike lights what with a charging circuit,
more "modes" than you can shake a stick at, need two of 'em (front and
rear) etc. so I figured that I'd rat their design and make actual bike
lights, front and rear drivers in one unit.

For tail lights I reckon a couple of red 1W Luxeons - one flashing, one
steady (mounted as far apart as possible) should do the job. For
headlights I figured a 3W white luxeon for "low" beam and a 5W jobbie
for "high" beam and both the 3W and 5W Luxeons on for a "super high"
beam. All managed and driven by a PIC micro to get the last bit of
usable charge from a power source of between about 5 and about 16
volts.

Thoughts anyone.

[2] http://www.microchip.com/

[3] http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_106372/article.html

The question for Suzyj - or anyone else come to that. Do you have any
recomendations for PCB layout software ? GPL for preference but cheap
will do if it has to...:-) Linux, doze or even OpenVMS is fine.

--
HumbugNot sure about mixing Luxeon wattages. Since they need different
currents you might need separate drivers for each type.


--
slaw

Humbug wrote:
The question for Suzyj - or anyone else come to that. Do you have any
recomendations for PCB layout software ? GPL for preference but cheap
will do if it has to...:-) Linux, doze or even OpenVMS is fine.

Suzy's praises are being sung on
http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000273073676/ There's the odd bit of
leching going on too

Graeme

On 05/05/06 at 07:07:31 Treadly somehow managed to type:

snip

The problem with the Silicon Chip one is that not only is the
design over the top, but the reliability of the circuit board too.
The Luxeon pucks are sealed and I've only ever had one fail was when I
connected the power up to it reverse polarity. I NEED reliability.

I can't see why a well put together controller would be any less
reliable than the Luxeon pucks. A well designed controller would've had
reverse polarity protection built in.


--
Humbug

On 2006-05-05, Humbug wrote:
On 05/05/06 at 07:07:31 Treadly somehow managed to type:
The problem with the Silicon Chip one is that not only is the
design over the top, but the reliability of the circuit board too.
The Luxeon pucks are sealed and I've only ever had one fail was when I
connected the power up to it reverse polarity. I NEED reliability.

I can't see why a well put together controller would be any less
reliable than the Luxeon pucks. A well designed controller would've had
reverse polarity protection built in.

Indeed. Diodes are dirt cheap; sure, you lose a little power (0.7V drop,
IIRC), but if you're going to blow out the entire board if somebody does
the wrong thing, it's well worth the cost.

I'm reminded of the tale of a guy who was designing systems to be
installed by drongos out in the middle of nowhere. The first lot was
wired up with reverse polarity, so the next revision had the terminals
shaped: positive was a square; negative a circle. The second lot was
wired up with reverse polarity: they'd hammered the connectors to fit
the wrong terminals. I seem to remember that there were a couple of
other similar instances before they finally built in a bridge rectifier,
and accepted the 1.4V drop in available voltage.

--
My Usenet From: address now expires after two weeks. If you email me, and
the mail bounces, try changing the bit before the "@" to "usenet".

On 05/05/06 at 14:20:23 Stuart Lamble somehow managed to type:

snip


I'm reminded of the tale of a guy who was designing systems to be
installed by drongos out in the middle of nowhere. The first lot was
wired up with reverse polarity, so the next revision had the terminals
shaped: positive was a square; negative a circle. The second lot was
wired up with reverse polarity: they'd hammered the connectors to fit
the wrong terminals.

As someone once said - "never underestimate the power of human
stupidity". The biggest bang I've seen was at the RA transmitter site
at Shep. Someone (NOT ME) tried (accidently) to see how low the
impedence of a 22KV line was by switching a BIG genset in out of phase.
The gen stopped and the big ex-ship diesel flung itself off its
mountings. BIG BANG followed by SILENCE. The answer to the impedance
question is VERY bloody low indeed...:-)

You can save the voltage drop by putting a fast blow fuse between the
power supply and the equipment. The first thing AFTER the fuse is a
hefty diode connected across the supply rails. Connect it up the wrong
way and the diode conducts and kills the fuse - hopefully before any
damage is done.

--
Humbug

Jaycar have a LED driver Kit for Luxeons which is a lot simpler, it drives
up to a 5W from a 12v supply with low battery cutout so you don't damage
your batteries.
I think it was Silicon Chip Nov 2004.

If you look at the latest article you will see they use a ex CPU heatsink to
cool the Luxeon. so keep that in mind when developing your setup. The older
article goes a little way to explaining how the choice of heatsink was done.
It also used a CPU heatsink. The article basically said the CPU heatsink was
marginal. but a moving bicycle should provide some airflow in the absence of
a fan.

It also discusses the option of driving a 3w LUXEON at 700ma instead of
1000mA to extend the life and decrease the intensity falloff due to running
near max output. Still 20 000 hour is probably enough but 50% reduction in
intensity is probably not and would be the limiting factor.

I am going to try the simpler circuit out with a single 3W LUXEON.

Wilfred
"Humbug" wrote in message
...
On 04/05/06 at 21:44:55 Treadly somehow managed to type:


I found a 'good design'
(http://www.hyperactive.oz.nf/Lights4/Luxeon4.htm) for mounting
Luxeons. It's a simple but neat design.

I've seen that one before - pretty neat. BUT. Last night while I was
looking around for Luxeon lighting ideas [1] I stumbled across this
http://www.pilom.com/BicycleElectronics/LEDhead.htm

[1] For the last month or so I've been messing around with PIC micros
for another purpose and spotted a bike light thing spread over two
issues of Silicon Chip mag - Apr and May 06 [3]. It's vastly
over-the-top for straight bike lights what with a charging circuit,
more "modes" than you can shake a stick at, need two of 'em (front and
rear) etc. so I figured that I'd rat their design and make actual bike
lights, front and rear drivers in one unit.

For tail lights I reckon a couple of red 1W Luxeons - one flashing, one
steady (mounted as far apart as possible) should do the job. For
headlights I figured a 3W white luxeon for "low" beam and a 5W jobbie
for "high" beam and both the 3W and 5W Luxeons on for a "super high"
beam. All managed and driven by a PIC micro to get the last bit of
usable charge from a power source of between about 5 and about 16 volts.

Thoughts anyone.

[2] http://www.microchip.com/

[3] http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_106372/article.html

The question for Suzyj - or anyone else come to that. Do you have any
recomendations for PCB layout software ? GPL for preference but cheap
will do if it has to...:-) Linux, doze or even OpenVMS is fine.

--
Humbug

Humbug wrote:
On 05/05/06 at 07:07:31 Treadly somehow managed to type:

snip

The problem with the Silicon Chip one is that not only is the
design over the top, but the reliability of the circuit board too.
The Luxeon pucks are sealed and I've only ever had one fail was when I
connected the power up to it reverse polarity. I NEED reliability.


I can't see why a well put together controller would be any less
reliable than the Luxeon pucks. A well designed controller would've had
reverse polarity protection built in.



I think for a road bike it might be ok but for a mountain bike it would
be too fragile.