|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who will race bikes now?
Two years on and now we're back to another hike in our license fees.
Hey maybe the fat cats can cut down on their salaries before they hike our fees. Expect a nice increase in entry fees around the corner. Seriously, though, $10 for 1 day licenses? I understand insurance rates and all that, but do the other federations also see the increases USAC offers us? 1. One-day license price will increase from 5 to 10 dollars. To not do this would mean that our annual members would be subsidizing our non-members. 2. The deductible for riders using the USA Cycling policy as primary coverage will increase from 2000 to 5000 dollars. For members who use this policy as secondary coverage, the deductible will stay at 1000 dollars. 3. The cost for a primary license will increase from 50 to 60 dollars. Add-on licenses will increase from 25 to 30 dollars. Other changes include the International Licenses increasing to 150 dollars and the junior license will cost 30 dollars. While we regret having to increase our license fees, I hope you understand that this decision is based solely on the ever rising cost of insurance. I also hope that with the steps we have taken regarding one day licenses and non-insured riders we can get this issue under better control. The insurance provided by USA Cycling has never been intended to provide primary coverage. We have been proactive in addressing this issue as well. We are working with an insurance company to offer competitively priced insurance that can be purchased by riders to protect them from experiencing excessive personal costs and to help cover the majority of the deductible under our policy. We hope to be rolling out this new program in the near future. I appreciate your understanding in this matter and commit to you that we will continue our efforts to manage this in the best interests of our members. I hope to see you all racing in 2005! Sincerely, Gerard Bisceglia, CEO USA Cycling, Inc. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The big mistake was when they raised the annual license fee to $50 but
kept the 1-day fee at $5. Lots of occasional racers decided it wasn't worth getting an annual license if they were only racing 4 or 5 races a year. I don't think $10 for 1-day licenses is excessive at all - should have been that way two years ago. I do think $60 for an annual license is excessive, and we will lose licensed riders as a result, but at least the Regional Associations that are doing much of the work on the local level are getting a cut of the license fees. From the promoter's prespective, the increases do not affect what they charge for entry fees. If entry fees go up, it's because of other factors, usually police costs and safety (ambulance) costs, or of course lack of sponsorship. Processing the 1-day licenses is by far the biggest post-race pain in the arse for promoters. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"TritonRider" wrote in message ... From: (chris) Date: 10/30/2004 6:10 PM Eastern Seriously, though, $10 for 1 day licenses? I understand insurance rates and all that, but do the other federations also see the increases USAC offers us? I would subsidize one days if that's what it took. They are designed to give people who haven't raced before, or are just thinking about coming back a chance to do it without spending serious cash for a yearly license. IMO this is going to discourage grass roots growth. Thanks Folks Bill C Nipplehead, Then I suggest you cut a check for all those one days and send it off to Gerard and explain what it's for Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not seeing a big problem attracting new racers. The one-day
license itself is pretty good at attracting new riders, even at $10. The problem I'm seeing is getting them up to Cat. 4 where they are racing consistently rather than just treating the local training rides as races and staying eternal Cat. 5s. We just had a little local bike race. The winning Cat. 5s got trophies and a handshake, most other classes got a bit of cash. Cat. 5s outnumbered Cat. 4s about 4:1 and more than half of them were racing on 1-day licenses. There are probably only 20 road races a year in the immediate area, so with $5 one-day licenses, most were quite content to forgo the annual license and buy one-day licenses for the five or six races they did. I need riders to get licences and get interested in upgrading so they can race in the really fun races with the big prizelists and learn what racing is all about. IMHO, a $60 annual license fee is a barrier to that. Maybe we should devote some of our club sponsorship to subsidizing the license fees for new riders?? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I can't tell you about all other federations but Inline speed skating
has a lousy federation. Compared to the USA Roller Sports, cycling has a great federation! I would be happy to pay the license costs if it helps the sport federation provide better services. The 1 day licenses should be expensive to encourage people to buy a one year license. How much does your bike cost? This year, I did only a few cycling races but I was still happy to pay the federation fee since in my experience they do a fairly good job. My advices for the USA Cycling would be to triple the cost for master fatty racing and cut the price of junior licenses to zero. Category fives should pay through the nose and the price should go down for each category. The category ones who have lost all their jobs due to their exercise addiction should have a one dollar license. -Mark TritonRider wrote: From: (chris) Date: 10/30/2004 6:10 PM Eastern Seriously, though, $10 for 1 day licenses? I understand insurance rates and all that, but do the other federations also see the increases USAC offers us? I would subsidize one days if that's what it took. They are designed to give people who haven't raced before, or are just thinking about coming back a chance to do it without spending serious cash for a yearly license. IMO this is going to discourage grass roots growth. Thanks Folks Bill C |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What's your point here Dave? Really, I think the real problem is the
escalation. Every two-three years license fees go up. Why did my UCI license go from $125 to $130 if the domestic increased by $10? Sounds like they shaved a bit off the UCI. Wait a second why **** does the UCI license cost so much to begin with? Where does that money go? I think the dual increase will hurt growth. Trust me, after running a training series for 2 years I know that a $10 fee will turn away people, but the the $60 annual fee will all but guarantee those one days won't go to the yearly. IMHO. CH |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article , chris
wrote: What's your point here Dave? Really, I think the real problem is the escalation. Every two-three years license fees go up. Why did my UCI license go from $125 to $130 if the domestic increased by $10? Sounds like they shaved a bit off the UCI. Wait a second why **** does the UCI license cost so much to begin with? Where does that money go? I think the dual increase will hurt growth. Trust me, after running a training series for 2 years I know that a $10 fee will turn away people, but the the $60 annual fee will all but guarantee those one days won't go to the yearly. IMHO. CH The cost of almost everything goes up over time. Look at gas prices, housing costs, the cost of most food items etc. Why should the cost of a racing license be any different from everything else that goes up over time? I actually think that the increase in 1 day license fees might give some people an incentive to take out an annual license instead of just racing on 1 day licenses. Next year the break even point ( where you start saving money getting an annual vs using a 1 day license) is 6 races instyead of the 10 races this year. I have seen lots of first time racers who don't blink at paying post enter surcharges, high entry fees, even pay for a full annual license just to do a single race. If promoters or clubs want to reduce the impact of the higher 1 day license fee they migh consider reducing or elliminating the post entry surcharge for people who are using a 1 day license. This would eliminate the impact of the higher 1 day license fee in most cases since most 1 day license users also tend to wait till race day to enter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
L.A. Confidential Excerpt | 'Dis Guy | Racing | 3 | October 10th 04 05:31 AM |
Free Bikes Instead of School Bus (long) | [Not Responding] | UK | 18 | May 17th 04 06:44 AM |
OK, I should write up a RR (Race Report)- and here it is. | miles todd | Mountain Biking | 1 | March 2nd 04 08:23 PM |
Big Race in Charlotte, NC in 2004 | Tom Arsenault | Racing | 1 | August 7th 03 01:25 PM |
Promoter's Lament -- from Hamilton world's site | Rik Van Diesel | Racing | 11 | July 11th 03 08:44 PM |