#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bridge Statistics
From a recent scan of the local cache of the newsgroup:
Number of posts: 9144 Posts by the troll: 192 Replies to the troll: 122 Troll reply/post ratio: .63 Number of repliers: 51 Replies per replier: 2.39 Most eggregious troll-wrestlers (number of replies follow in parentheses) Marc Brett ( 10 ) Tom Crispin ( 6 ) "Adam Lea" ( 6 ) Pete ( 5 ) "Clive George" ( 5 ) MJ Ray ( 5 ) Jon has moved ! ( 5 ) Helen Deborah Vecht ( 4 ) "Just zis Guy, you know?" ( 4 ) Nick ( 4 ) Were the above to abandon troll-wrestling the reply/post ratio would fall to .35 Were all of the repliers who did so only once to have practiced restraint the number of repliers would fall to 27 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bridge Statistics
_ wrote:
From a recent scan of the local cache of the newsgroup: ... Most eggregious troll-wrestlers (number of replies follow in parentheses) ... Were the above to abandon troll-wrestling the reply/post ratio would fall to .35 Were all of the repliers who did so only once to have practiced restraint the number of repliers would fall to 27 Did you do the same analysis on your posts? Ah, I thought not. I'd bet that your so-called "troll", the poster that you seem to be so envious of, has a better response ratio, and a wider reply base, than you get for your own sad, spiteful, and pointless ejaculations. -- Matt B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bridge Statistics
On 4 Sep, 16:30, Matt B wrote:
Ah, I thought not. I'd bet that your so-called "troll", the poster that you seem to be so envious of, has a better response ratio, and a wider reply base, than you get for your own sad, spiteful, and pointless ejaculations. I'm starting to get the feeling you don't like being called a troll. Some suggestions if you want to lose that status: 1) Make your points concisely then leave it, don't argue everything to death. Long running threads sliding over the same sort of ground are typical of troll wrestling. 5 posts per thread, 10 max. should be enough to make your point. If you haven't convinced people of your case by then, you are probably not going to. 2) Don't jump to the conclusion that everything that _might_ be evidence for your point of view _is_ evidence for your point of view. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't. Anticipate the criticism, self censor, review before you click the send button, choose to discard sometimes. 3) Write about your cycling experiences. This is a cycling newsgroup, if you don't do that, you're always likely to be an outsider, and much more likely to be considered a troll. If you don't cycle, there must be other more relevant newsgroups/forum for your views on motoring taxation and safety. Rob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bridge Statistics
On Sep 4, 4:30 pm, Matt B wrote:
_ wrote: From a recent scan of the local cache of the newsgroup: ... Most eggregious troll-wrestlers (number of replies follow in parentheses) ... Were the above to abandon troll-wrestling the reply/post ratio would fall to .35 Were all of the repliers who did so only once to have practiced restraint the number of repliers would fall to 27 Did you do the same analysis on your posts? Ah, I thought not. I'd bet that your so-called "troll", the poster that you seem to be so envious of, has a better response ratio, and a wider reply base If you measure the quality of your postings by the number of replies you get, as you imply you do above then you must be posting simply to get replies. Thus you are a troll. A poster who get few replies may do so simply because no-one feels the need to add anything, or dispute what the poster has written. e.g. Look at some of the ride reports. There are several people whose posts I read, but rarely reply to. This is because I don't feel the need to add anything to what they say. IMHO this makes what they write good material. Your posts, I only usually see if I see someone replying to them, and in this case having to look the post with google. than you get for your own sad, spiteful, and pointless ejaculations. I see you are arguing using valid points, rather than just reverting to insulting someone. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bridge Statistics
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where are those statistics? | bob | UK | 15 | August 30th 07 12:31 PM |
Bridge Statistics | _[_2_] | UK | 1 | August 27th 07 03:26 PM |
Any statistics on how to get hurt? | lifeisgood | UK | 18 | October 9th 05 10:36 PM |
Statistics on cycling | RobD | UK | 0 | May 29th 05 07:25 AM |
Helmet use statistics | Alan Walker | UK | 62 | March 6th 04 01:34 AM |