driver uses car as weapon, driver gets life

Doug gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

Which Doug are you responding to?

Does it matter? There is no noticable difference between them.

Maybe the difference is too subtle for you?

The difference is clear. You believe the ******** you post. The "other
Duhg" is a troll pretending to be you but posting satirically.

It's a bit of a waste of effort because you really don't need to be
satirised. You're ludicrous enough as it is.

On 16/10/2010 22:24, BrianW wrote:
On Oct 16, 7:46 pm, (Steve Firth) wrote:
wrote:
The term "hypocrite" barely begins to cover Dugglearse Bollen.

Source?

Me, just now, you ****wit.

I think you've all been had. The "Doug" in this post is posting from
the address ". In other words, it's Doug
"Bollen" not Bollen, the wannabee Bollen. You think you are arguing
with Doug "not Bollen" Bollen, aka the Catford ****.

I think you may be right, Ive just come back after a few days away &
there now appears to be two Dougs.
Have you checked the sigs from rocketmail Doug?

--
Tony Dragon

On 18/10/2010 09:26, Adrian wrote:
gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

Which Doug are you responding to?

Does it matter? There is no noticable difference between them.

Maybe the difference is too subtle for you?

The difference is clear. You believe the ******** you post. The "other
Duhg" is a troll pretending to be you but posting satirically.

It's a bit of a waste of effort because you really don't need to be
satirised. You're ludicrous enough as it is.

Oh, I do so agree with you, the rocketmail Doug can not even get close
to the shear rubish the real Doug posts, but don't forget, do not agree
with Doug, because he will turn and bite you.

--
Tony Dragon

"Tony Dragon" wrote in message
news
On 18/10/2010 09:26, Adrian wrote:
gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were
saying:

Which Doug are you responding to?

Does it matter? There is no noticable difference between them.

Maybe the difference is too subtle for you?

The difference is clear. You believe the ******** you post. The "other
Duhg" is a troll pretending to be you but posting satirically.

It's a bit of a waste of effort because you really don't need to be
satirised. You're ludicrous enough as it is.

Oh, I do so agree with you, the rocketmail Doug can not even get close to
the shear rubish the real Doug posts, but don't forget, do not agree with
Doug, because he will turn and bite you.

Which Doug should we not agree with?

On 18 Oct, 19:44, "Brimstone" wrote:
"Tony Dragon" wrote in message

news
On 18/10/2010 09:26, Adrian wrote:
*gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were
saying:

Which Doug are you responding to?

Does it matter? There is no noticable difference between them.

Maybe the difference is too subtle for you?

The difference is clear. You believe the ******** you post. The "other
Duhg" is a troll pretending to be you but posting satirically.

It's a bit of a waste of effort because you really don't need to be
satirised. You're ludicrous enough as it is.

Oh, I do so agree with you, the rocketmail Doug can not even get close to
the shear rubish the real Doug posts, but don't forget, do not agree with
Doug, because he will turn and bite you.

Which Doug should we not agree with?

The one who persists in answering your endless questions, obviously.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

On 15 Oct, 20:38, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
It's good to see that a car driver, using a car as a weapon, has got
his just desserts, life with a minimum of eighteen years.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...r-driver-who-m...

I'm just a bit surprised that no one else has posted it.

why would they? *This is a cycling newsgroup, hence your posting is off
topic.

But cyclists are sometimes murdered with car weapons too.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

Doug gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

Which Doug should we not agree with?

The one who persists in avoiding your endless questions, obviously.

A good point, well made.

"Doug" wrote in message
...
On 18 Oct, 19:44, "Brimstone" wrote:
"Tony Dragon" wrote in message

news
On 18/10/2010 09:26, Adrian wrote:
gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were
saying:

Which Doug are you responding to?

Does it matter? There is no noticable difference between them.

Maybe the difference is too subtle for you?

The difference is clear. You believe the ******** you post. The "other
Duhg" is a troll pretending to be you but posting satirically.

It's a bit of a waste of effort because you really don't need to be
satirised. You're ludicrous enough as it is.

Oh, I do so agree with you, the rocketmail Doug can not even get close
to
the shear rubish the real Doug posts, but don't forget, do not agree
with
Doug, because he will turn and bite you.

Which Doug should we not agree with?

The one who persists in answering your endless questions, obviously.

But you never answer my questions Doug.

Brimstone wrote:
"Doug" wrote in message
...
On 18 Oct, 19:44, "Brimstone" wrote:

Which Doug should we not agree with?

The one who persists in answering your endless questions, obviously.

But you never answer my questions Doug.

That's an indication of which Doug is which.

It's also an indication of which is worth engaging with in what, after all,
is a discussion forum.

On 19/10/2010 08:02, Doug wrote:
On 15 Oct, 20:38, wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
It's good to see that a car driver, using a car as a weapon, has got
his just desserts, life with a minimum of eighteen years.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...r-driver-who-m...

I'm just a bit surprised that no one else has posted it.

why would they? This is a cycling newsgroup, hence your posting is off
topic.

But cyclists are sometimes murdered with car weapons too.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

Cyclists are sometimes injured by paper cuts, why are you note posting
to a greetings card making ng? (for example)

--
Tony Dragon