Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans!

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 23:50:53 -0500, "Stormin Mormon"
wrote:

Comments inserted following my initials.

Did you say something?

Yes, you are cyclophobic troll. It sucks to be you.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are
fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

S Curtiss wrote:
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:51:58 -0500, "S Curtiss"
wrote:

"The great push of man's numbers," does not include the random
visitation
of
man to a habitat.
Prove it. That is just your own opinion, supported by NOTHING.
Awww.... Mikey... You are a middle-man whose usefullness has been
outdone.
The injection of your "total exclusion" opinions into the writings of
others
is hardly useful, realistic or beneficial to the discussion of
preservation.
The "middle-man" has been eliminated as the actual reserach and the actual
researchers are accessible to everyone. The agencies that used to rely on
comments such as yours have access to the original information at the
touch
of a button. The average person also has access and can make up their own
minds without the benefit of elitists' medling.
You sit on a "warehouse" of outdated product as everyone else moves
forward
with direct contact, actual research and educated decisions. You are not
smarter than anyone else. Your opinions no longer have influence as nobody
is interested in what research you quote as everyone has access to the
full
context of the original. The actual researcher who complied the original
research is much more qualified than you to offer recommendations from
their
findings.
Perhaps you should have a "Going Out Of Business" sale. People may need
birdcage filler or fishwraps or puppy-training paper....

The author, here, was trying to convey the idea that we
need to set aside space that development efforts will not be allowed to
reach.

...which in no way implies that mountain biking should be removed from
every
natural area. Creating "human free" areas does not imply complete bans on
nature cycling in every non-paved area.


Did you say something?

Yep. And anyone with the common sense logic beyond that of a doorknob will
know what it is and that you have nothing to dispute it.



Well, as mikey likes to say,
you can't dispute the truth.