|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Joe Riel wrote:
jim beam writes: i'm not trying to b.s. you. go back to basics like lami's theorem & do the math for tri-axial loads Triaxial? For three loads to sum to zero they must be coplanar (i.e. lie in a common plane). yes, they lie on the same plane - by definition! Whose definition? You used the term "triaxial" as though it applied to this situation. I'm aware of two common uses of "triaxial": (1) three elements sharing a common axis (e.g. triaxial cable or triaxial speakers; and (2) a quantity that can be decomposed into three independent axes (e.g. one would use a triaxial accelerometer to measure acceleration in the three spatial dimensions). good point - definition 1, but expanded a little. "triaxial" just means 3 axes. they can be co-linear [cable], co-planar, http://hexdome.com/weaving/triaxial/weaving/index.php or 3-dimensional. i mean it in the co-planar sense. The first usage clearly doesn't apply---if the forces share a common axis then there is no triangle. The second, which is more likely to be relevant, also doesn't apply; if the three axes are independent, then the forces are not in static equilibrium (i.e. they are not coplanar and don't sum to zero). Maybe there is a third usage I'm not aware. Not that this has any particular relevance to the matter at hand... Joe |
Ads |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
jim beam writes:
good point - definition 1, but expanded a little. "triaxial" just means 3 axes. they can be co-linear [cable], co-planar, http://hexdome.com/weaving/triaxial/weaving/index.php or 3-dimensional. i mean it in the co-planar sense. Nice site, thanks. I like the name "whug", to go along with the more familar warp and weft. Joe |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 05:19:40 GMT, Joe Riel
wrote: jim beam writes: good point - definition 1, but expanded a little. "triaxial" just means 3 axes. they can be co-linear [cable], co-planar, http://hexdome.com/weaving/triaxial/weaving/index.php or 3-dimensional. i mean it in the co-planar sense. Nice site, thanks. I like the name "whug", to go along with the more familar warp and weft. Joe Dear Joe, And I like your reply, which led me to look at the site--"whug" is indeed the word. Sadly "whug" doesn't seem to be used anywhere else yet, but with luck it may catch on. Thanks, Carl Fogel |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Sherman wrote: If you believe this try riding without a frontskewer By implication, this means that you have ridden without a front skewer. Please report on the experience. -- Tom Sherman - Earth About 12 years ago, as we approached the final turn before a ~1/4mi straight to the finish of a 40mi road race, I looked down to notice that my front skewer was open--and this was a bike w/o lawyer lips, BTW. I decided to forgo contesting the sprint, but I did ride the rest of the way in before stopping. 40 mile race, open skewer, no problems, though its not an experiment I would like to replicate... Matt. |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Matt wrote: About 12 years ago, as we approached the final turn before a ~1/4mi straight to the finish of a 40mi road race, I looked down to notice that my front skewer was open--and this was a bike w/o lawyer lips, BTW. I decided to forgo contesting the sprint, but I did ride the rest of the way in before stopping. I had a similar experience on a century with a mountain climb in the middle. As I pulled little near-wheelies during the last 20% grade at the summit I felt my wheel clunking. When I stopped and lifted the front the wheel fell out. I can only assume that the QR had been open since the start 50 miles before. I had hit over 40 mph on the rollers leading up to the summit -- a sobering realization. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Cole" writes:
Matt wrote: About 12 years ago, as we approached the final turn before a ~1/4mi straight to the finish of a 40mi road race, I looked down to notice that my front skewer was open--and this was a bike w/o lawyer lips, BTW. I decided to forgo contesting the sprint, but I did ride the rest of the way in before stopping. I had a similar experience on a century with a mountain climb in the middle. As I pulled little near-wheelies during the last 20% grade at the summit I felt my wheel clunking. When I stopped and lifted the front the wheel fell out. I can only assume that the QR had been open since the start 50 miles before. I had hit over 40 mph on the rollers leading up to the summit -- a sobering realization. OK, both you guys whomped the hell out of my little anecdote! ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
if you wanted maximum braking, where would you sit? | wle | Techniques | 133 | November 18th 15 02:10 AM |
Windosr Tourist Bike Revisiited | Earl Bollinger | General | 16 | February 13th 05 08:04 PM |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
Still Looking for a bike | [email protected] | UK | 19 | September 5th 04 10:25 AM |
Convert Hybrid to Touring bike | Willy Smallboy | Techniques | 23 | March 26th 04 01:03 PM |