|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
ITM Carbon Fiber Fork?
On Jan 6, 4:09*pm, wrote:
I've ridden no-hands uphill with my Cinelli quill stem loose in the steertube .... *Therefore, old safety standards cannot be applied. You're right. The steerer clamp on a threadless setup is far more secure than a classic quill stem. In a threadless setup the stem is further secured by the compression of the "top cap" so that even if the steerer clamp were to fail completely (1) the stem cannot slide off the steerer vertically AND (2) the top cap provides/enhances some measure of frictional engagement between stem and steerer to retain a minimal amount of steering control. Again, because the steering forces are very small, the bike is likely to be ridable (to a stop), even if not ideally safe for continued cruising. Anyone who has ever snugged up the top cap but then forgotten to tighten the steerer clamp knows this. DR |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
ITM Carbon Fiber Fork?
DR wrote:
I've ridden no-hands uphill with my Cinelli quill stem loose in the steertube... Â*Therefore, old safety standards cannot be applied. You're right. The steerer clamp on a threadless setup is far more secure than a classic quill stem. Especially if the quill stem uses a slant wedge as an expander... and unscrews itself. Although that design stopped causing bulges in the steertube, it doesn't arrest the stem safely. In a threadless setup the stem is further secured by the compression of the "top cap" so that even if the steerer clamp were to fail completely (1) the stem cannot slide off the steerer vertically AND (2) the top cap provides/enhances some measure of frictional engagement between stem and steerer to retain a minimal amount of steering control. That is expecting miracles from a device whose screw is designed to adjust head bearings with low force precision that was formerly a difficult and inaccurate function in threaded steertube bearings using monster octagonal wrenches. Again, because the steering forces are very small, the bike is likely to be ridable (to a stop), even if not ideally safe for continued cruising. Anyone who has ever snugged up the top cap but then forgotten to tighten the steerer clamp knows this. DR I've done it a few times and found the slower you go, the more difficult no-hands steering becomes because it relies on front wheel centrifugal torque. Defending the quill stem against the threadless steertube design makes use of mythical wishes. Having worked on and ridden bicycles for more than 60 years, I was glad to see the threadless steertube arrive. -- Jobst Brandt |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
ITM Carbon Fiber Fork?
On Jan 7, 12:17*pm, wrote:
DR wrote: I've ridden no-hands uphill with my Cinelli quill stem loose in the steertube... *Therefore, old safety standards cannot be applied. You're right. The steerer clamp on a threadless setup is far more secure than a classic quill stem. Especially if the quill stem uses a slant wedge as an expander... and unscrews itself. *Although that design stopped causing bulges in the steertube, it doesn't arrest the stem safely. In a threadless setup the stem is further secured by the compression of the "top cap" so that even if the steerer clamp were to fail completely (1) the stem cannot slide off the steerer vertically AND (2) the top cap provides/enhances some measure of frictional engagement between stem and steerer to retain a minimal amount of steering control. That is expecting miracles from a device whose screw is designed to adjust head bearings with low force precision that was formerly a difficult and inaccurate function in threaded steertube bearings using monster octagonal wrenches. Miracles ? Hardly. If you re-read (look for "minimal steering control"), you will see that I did not suggest that the top cap is, in any way, a substitute for the steerer clamp. I merely pointed out that the failure of the steerer clamp is not nearly as catastrophic as you would fantasize. I was describing what occurs in the real world. Please consider addressing what was written rather than what you wish or assume was written. Again, because the steering forces are very small, the bike is likely to be ridable (to a stop), even if not ideally safe for continued cruising. *Anyone who has ever snugged up the top cap but then forgotten to tighten the steerer clamp knows this. *DR I've done it a few times and found the slower you go, the more difficult no-hands steering becomes because it relies on front wheel centrifugal torque. * When I said "ridable (to a stop)" I meant just that. And, no, it is not "no hands" because there is still a weak but usable frictional steering connection between the stem and steerer. Defending the quill stem against the threadless steertube design makes use of mythical wishes. *Having worked on and ridden bicycles for more than 60 years, I was glad to see the threadless steertube arrive. So who is this straw person who you think is defending the quill stem? DR |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ITM Carbon Fiber Fork? | Tom Kunich | General | 0 | January 5th 11 03:27 PM |
Trek carbon fiber frame with aluminum lugs and rear triangle, aKinesis carbon fork (threaded steerer tube) and a Shimano headset | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | February 19th 08 04:23 AM |
FA: Girvin Fork in Carbon Fiber w/ NR2 Shock | RonSonic | Marketplace | 5 | March 28th 06 08:59 AM |
carbon fiber fork question | TedK618265 | Techniques | 12 | December 28th 03 02:42 PM |
F/S Look Carbon fiber Fork | James | Marketplace | 1 | July 10th 03 07:10 PM |