|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Tuschinski Wrote: I asume this is because you like Hamilton more as Hampsten? As Hampste has a much more impressive palmares. There is no ground yet to cal Hamilton third american. Not only that Hampsten won more important multi-stage races, he als had a pretty long, pretty constant career. Hamilton simply isn't ther yet. His LBL+TT win simply doesn't beat a Giro. Considering Hampste won Romandie, and TdS twice, besides his top ranking in the TdF Hamilton has some way to go. Hamilton has more punch and drama. To some that is more importan *shrug*. I myself think he must hope for a Vuelta win(this year?), a the other GT's are just a little too much for this little fighter. Heh, I'll probably be proven wrong when he sweeps the competition nex year... such is life From what I have gleaned in the media, I do like Hamilton better as person. But I also think he is a more complete rider. Hampsten was nowhere i a TT compared to Hamilton. Hampsten was nowhere in a one day race while Hamilton can and does mix it up with the best when he wants to. Hampsten was arguably a better climber, but Hamilton can climb quit well, thank you very much, has won KOM in Paris-Nice, and winning th Dauphine is pretty large. He finished second in the Giro while injured probably would have won it but hasn't won it, but then he has to choos his strategies to match his opponents, and that means focusing on th TDF right now. I don't really see it as a victory to victory comparison, although suspect Hamilton will surpass Hampsten's palmares in time. I conside Hamilton to be better because he is a more complete rider, far superio in some disciplines, and closer in talent to Hampsten's strengths tha Hampsten is to Hamilton in Hamilton's strengths. :cool -- derby |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Kenny wrote:
Ras Babo wrote in message ... Kenny wrote: This is strange. When you guys try to compare TH and AH, you also take 2.HC and WC races in consideration. Now that's an evolution! Shouldn't it have to be: "TH: 0 GT's, AH: 1 GT = AH TH" according to the american Merckx-Amstrong comparison rules (EM: 5 TDF, LA 6 TDF = LA EM (ever)). Or does this rule only apply to LA? The "rule" only applies if you take morons seriously. And attribute their stupidity to everyone. Now that's why i called it an AMERICAN rule. Ah, I see. Everything seen on television is true, and everything read on RBR is reality. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cycling and vegetarianism | Preston Crawford | General | 434 | September 25th 04 09:38 PM |
Gels vs Gatorade | Ken | Techniques | 145 | August 3rd 04 06:56 PM |
LANCE ARMSTRONG'S BID FOR COVETED SIXTH TOUR DE FRANCE FOILED | Richard Longwood | Racing | 6 | June 28th 04 03:06 AM |
Dumb American sportswriters vs. Cycling journalists | Bruce Johnston | Racing | 1 | July 24th 03 05:13 PM |
TDF: Nantes Time Trial Viewing | tebo13 | Racing | 1 | July 24th 03 02:24 AM |