|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2dQBs8SPJCwHWOQJKJ7iTH2biX8YS99iieCnHEnMSmIyYpRGu2 GbEDbjghzuLcS1Ag6iwKZzjc2FdcwVset1Q6c9i0n
Supreme Court majority ruled it was an extreme misuse of Government
power in which an innocent person was led to commit a manufactured crime. [NYT 4/7/1992, front page] Guess what job he had for the two years the government repeatedly stroked him to buy youth-oriented naked publications? A children's school bus driver. ---- It's not a pretty thought, but legislators should consider that there is a distinct category of child pornography possession that I would call "Click-Crime". People who come across child pornography, and for whatever wrong reason save a copy of the picture. They didn't mean to become vile heinous doomed-to-burn-in-hell creatures; it's just one of those things where people make the wrong decisions when encountering something in the privacy of their own home. As the government monitors the Net closer, they will spot tens of thousands of these people. They've already arrested hundreds of them. * FBI sting nets over 200 arrests for child pornography * 6/97 stat: 94 convictions, 104 "pending" convictions It's not hard to spot them, and may I point out that it happens despite free uncrackable encryption (PGP) being available worldwide for years. Yeah, I know, it's heresy to try and suggest there's a category called "child pornography light". Here are some sample cases of the broad base of people involved: * The New York Times, 3/6/97 * Minister Gets Probation in Pornography Case * * A Baptist minister who copied child pornography images off the * Internet received three years' probation in exchange for his * guilty plea to a reduced charge. * * He must pay a $1,000 fine, forfei |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|