Local man mown down.

The lorry driver was uninjured.

http://www.thisishullandeastriding.c...l/article.html


--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:15:15 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

The lorry driver was uninjured.

Excellent news


http://www.thisishullandeastriding.c...l/article.html



Many thanks - keep the reports coming.


It reinforces what you know deep down.


--
Stopping distances for bicycles do not appear in the HC ... and so
cannot be of any consequence.
(Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20 mph limits - and thinks it's clever)

"JMS" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:15:15 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

The lorry driver was uninjured.

Excellent news


http://www.thisishullandeastriding.c...l/article.html



Many thanks - keep the reports coming.


It reinforces what you know deep down.

It merely reinforces what people deep down know about *you*, that's all.
Glad to see you are taking the bait and showing your true colours as usual.

--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:16:45 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:


"JMS" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:15:15 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

The lorry driver was uninjured.

Excellent news


http://www.thisishullandeastriding.c...l/article.html



Many thanks - keep the reports coming.


It reinforces what you know deep down.

It merely reinforces what people deep down know about *you*, that's all.
Glad to see you are taking the bait and showing your true colours as usual.



Feel free to comment on what you think my true colours are.

If I am "taking the bait" - you can point out how so, and then ****
yourself at my expense.

So come on then - put up or shut up.

The problem with you sunshine is that you have no ability to follow
simple statements of fact.

Here is a simple little exercise for you:

To what does my comment "Excellent news" apply?

--
Stopping distances for bicycles do not appear in the HC ... and so
cannot be of any consequence.
(Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20 mph limits - and thinks it's clever)

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:01:17 +0100, JMS
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:16:45 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:


"JMS" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:15:15 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

The lorry driver was uninjured.

Excellent news


http://www.thisishullandeastriding.c...l/article.html



Many thanks - keep the reports coming.


It reinforces what you know deep down.

It merely reinforces what people deep down know about *you*, that's all.
Glad to see you are taking the bait and showing your true colours as usual.



Feel free to comment on what you think my true colours are.

If I am "taking the bait" - you can point out how so, and then ****
yourself at my expense.

So come on then - put up or shut up.

The problem with you sunshine is that you have no ability to follow
simple statements of fact.

Here is a simple little exercise for you:

To what does my comment "Excellent news" apply?
The word "excellent" is a subjective and therefore cannot regarded as
factual (objective).

To which statement of fact are you then referring? In what way is the
other poster incapable of following this statement?

Why should the onus of guessing what you mean with your subjective
statement be placed upon the reader. Are you not capable of
unambigious or clear communication?

"Justin Lewis" wrote in message
To what does my comment "Excellent news" apply?
The word "excellent" is a subjective and therefore cannot regarded as
factual (objective).

To which statement of fact are you then referring? In what way is the
other poster incapable of following this statement?

Why should the onus of guessing what you mean with your subjective
statement be placed upon the reader. Are you not capable of
unambigious or clear communication?

Have a heart. She struggled calculating 7/4 x 20 = 35!

--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:21:29 +0200, Justin Lewis
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:01:17 +0100, JMS
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:16:45 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:


"JMS" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:15:15 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

The lorry driver was uninjured.

Excellent news


http://www.thisishullandeastriding.c...l/article.html



Many thanks - keep the reports coming.


It reinforces what you know deep down.

It merely reinforces what people deep down know about *you*, that's all.
Glad to see you are taking the bait and showing your true colours as usual.



Feel free to comment on what you think my true colours are.

If I am "taking the bait" - you can point out how so, and then ****
yourself at my expense.

So come on then - put up or shut up.

The problem with you sunshine is that you have no ability to follow
simple statements of fact.

Here is a simple little exercise for you:

To what does my comment "Excellent news" apply?
The word "excellent" is a subjective and therefore cannot regarded as
factual (objective).

To which statement of fact are you then referring? In what way is the
other poster incapable of following this statement?

Why should the onus of guessing what you mean with your subjective
statement be placed upon the reader. Are you not capable of
unambigious or clear communication?



I was aiming the comments at those with common sense - not
pretentious arrogant ****wits.

OED : (The current sense; originally a contextual use of 1.)
Used as an emphatic expression of praise or approval, whether of
persons, things, or actions: Extremely good.

I am sorry that you could not understand.

What a tosser.

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:


"Justin Lewis" wrote in message
To what does my comment "Excellent news" apply?
The word "excellent" is a subjective and therefore cannot regarded as
factual (objective).

To which statement of fact are you then referring? In what way is the
other poster incapable of following this statement?

Why should the onus of guessing what you mean with your subjective
statement be placed upon the reader. Are you not capable of
unambigious or clear communication?

Have a heart. She struggled calculating 7/4 x 20 = 35!

What a knob.

Why on earth does 7/4 x20 = 35 factorial ?

(Or perhaps you haven't covered that yet?)

You really are excellent value

Ho, ho, ho - yet another who does not know what "Excellent news" means
- don't struggle with my reply to him - it contains the OED definition
- you will not understand.

So is it 35% or 20% of the drivers in Hull who have a broken headlamp.

Don't be shy - feel free to explain.

Or were you making it up?

--
Stopping distances for bicycles do not appear in the HC ... and so
cannot be of any consequence.
(Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20 mph limits - and thinks it's clever)

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:33:57 +0100, JMS
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:21:29 +0200, Justin Lewis
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:01:17 +0100, JMS
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:16:45 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:


"JMS" wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:15:15 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

The lorry driver was uninjured.

Excellent news


http://www.thisishullandeastriding.c...l/article.html



Many thanks - keep the reports coming.


It reinforces what you know deep down.

It merely reinforces what people deep down know about *you*, that's all.
Glad to see you are taking the bait and showing your true colours as usual.



Feel free to comment on what you think my true colours are.

If I am "taking the bait" - you can point out how so, and then ****
yourself at my expense.

So come on then - put up or shut up.

The problem with you sunshine is that you have no ability to follow
simple statements of fact.

Here is a simple little exercise for you:

To what does my comment "Excellent news" apply?
The word "excellent" is a subjective and therefore cannot regarded as
factual (objective).

To which statement of fact are you then referring? In what way is the
other poster incapable of following this statement?

Why should the onus of guessing what you mean with your subjective
statement be placed upon the reader. Are you not capable of
unambigious or clear communication?



I was aiming the comments at those with common sense - not
pretentious arrogant ****wits.
You were looking for an argument, as you so often do in your postings.
You got it and lost.
OED : (The current sense; originally a contextual use of 1.)
Used as an emphatic expression of praise or approval, whether of
persons, things, or actions: Extremely good.
Praise or approval both being an expression of subjectivity. We are
still waiting for you to show us the simple statement of fact which a
fellow poster could not understand.
I am sorry that you could not understand.

What a tosser.
That is a particulalrly enlightening and enlightened approach: thanks
for undermining yourself and everything you post.

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:33:02 +0200, Justin Lewis
wrote:

snip


I was aiming the comments at those with common sense - not
pretentious arrogant ****wits.
You were looking for an argument, as you so often do in your postings.
You got it and lost.
OED : (The current sense; originally a contextual use of 1.)
Used as an emphatic expression of praise or approval, whether of
persons, things, or actions: Extremely good.
Praise or approval both being an expression of subjectivity. We are
still waiting for you to show us the simple statement of fact which a
fellow poster could not understand.

I am sorry that you could not understand.

What a tosser.
That is a particulalrly enlightening and enlightened approach: thanks
for undermining yourself and everything you post.



Sorry - sunshine - the post which you made which showed *you* to be a
pretentious and arrogant tosser says nothing about me - and of course
an awful lot about you.

I have no qualms in pointing it out.

You are of course right : "Excellent news" would mean nothing to a
tosser like you; but I suggest that the majority of other readers
would understand. (That would exclude Mason - as he seems to be as
thick as you)

I think that Mason and you are "Excellent value" - is that
grammatically correct?

--
Stopping distances for bicycles do not appear in the HC ... and so
cannot be of any consequence.
(Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20 mph limits - and thinks it's clever)