|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Oregon vs California law graphic
Bill Zaumen wrote:
Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: If a burglar steals $1000 in property versus $2000 in property on one heist, the sentence is not going to be twice as long, all else being equal. Oh, BTW, Charles Keating got a 10 year sentence in 1992, followed by a 12.5 year sentence in 1993, and was released after 4.5 years. His sentences were eventually overturned. That's not counting the civil cases, nor a subsequent conviction for bankruptcy fraud, where he was sentence to time already served. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Keating Yes, and if someone committed enough store robberies to steel as much as Keating, and was caught and convicted for all of them, the combined sentences would be much greater that what Keating received. Duh! You obviously missed the point, and your "Duh" just shows your stupidity. No Zaumen, you failed to make a logical point. Sherman, you are an idiot. snip Where is the peer reviewed citation to back the above contention? The world breathlessly awaits! Idiot. Zaumen is a man of limited vocabulary, it appears. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
Ads |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Oregon vs California law graphic
Bill Zaumen wrote:
Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: No, you are an idiot. Peer reviewed citation? Idiot. Can we take this to mean that Zaumen is unable to produce said citation, so he merely repeats his insult? That you are an idiot is an obvious fact. Mr. Zaumen is committing the elementary error of confusing opinion with fact. Idiot. Such commanding use of the English language on display by Zaumen! Idiot. Snappy reply when it is used for every post, eh? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Oregon vs California law graphic
Bill Zaumen wrote:
Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Eric Vey writes: Bill Z. wrote: Eric Vey writes: Bill Z. wrote: Eric Vey writes: Police chases kill more than 300 people a year. And one-third of them are innocent bystanders. ... which has nothing to do with your claim about "gotten so common". Your lastest "story" simply points out that the risk of a high speed chase can outweigh the benefits of catching a criminal. It has nothing to do with how "common" it is. Busily catching up, Saturday afternoon brought is a real winner. This happened in the next county over, where I used to live. Bicyclists like it because it is rural and there isn't as much traffic. They feel safe there. How'd you like to be "sharing the road" with this maniac? FHP Investigating Pursuit That Ended In Deadly Head-On Crash LAKE COUNTY, Fla -- The Lake County Sheriff's Office said that because of policy a deputy did not initiate a chase when Jeremy Halfacre wouldn't pull over for a traffic stop in Umatilla on Saturday. Yawn. If you scour the net, you can find your "man bites dog" stories. I don't have to scour the 'net. These are local stories -- every single one of them. Didn't you notice that? Yawn. A story about the police not initiating a chase because they thought it might be dangerous? So what? It as nothing to do with what you claimed (you are now trying to shift the discussion to make it look like you were talking about something else). In case you didn't notice, the original claim was something about "Tell that to the gang banger who is driving without a license in a stolen car while carrying an unregistered gun." and you or that Sherman troll made some other outrageous claims that you failed to back up. Hey Zaumen, If you ever got out of your middle class, conservative (small "c") mindset and spent some time in the 'hood and got to know some people, you would realize just how common that scenario is. Idiot. Can we get Zaumen nominated for the Nobel Prize in literature for this post? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Oregon vs California law graphic
Bill Zaumen wrote:
Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Citation? Idiot. Citation? Your comments above will do. Peer reviewed citation? You are an idiot. Zaumen must have a keyboard macro for "You are an idiot". Idiot. Fingers getting tired? Write your macro! Idiot A man of too few words. To what does idiot refer to in this context? Idiot. Help Zaumen - his needle is stuck in a groove! Idiot. Zaumen's command of the English language, as exhibited here, continues to astound. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Oregon vs California law graphic
Tom Sherman writes:
Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: If a burglar steals $1000 in property versus $2000 in property on one heist, the sentence is not going to be twice as long, all else being equal. Oh, BTW, Charles Keating got a 10 year sentence in 1992, followed by a 12.5 year sentence in 1993, and was released after 4.5 years. His sentences were eventually overturned. That's not counting the civil cases, nor a subsequent conviction for bankruptcy fraud, where he was sentence to time already served. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Keating Yes, and if someone committed enough store robberies to steel as much as Keating, and was caught and convicted for all of them, the combined sentences would be much greater that what Keating received. Duh! You obviously missed the point, and your "Duh" just shows your stupidity. No Zaumen, you failed to make a logical point. Sherman, you are an idiot. snip Where is the peer reviewed citation to back the above contention? The world breathlessly awaits! Idiot. Zaumen is a man of limited vocabulary, it appears. Idiot. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Oregon vs California law graphic
Tom Sherman writes:
Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: No, you are an idiot. Peer reviewed citation? Idiot. Can we take this to mean that Zaumen is unable to produce said citation, so he merely repeats his insult? That you are an idiot is an obvious fact. Mr. Zaumen is committing the elementary error of confusing opinion with fact. Idiot. Such commanding use of the English language on display by Zaumen! Idiot. Snappy reply when it is used for every post, eh? Idiot. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Oregon vs California law graphic
Tom Sherman writes:
Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Idiot. Can we get Zaumen nominated for the Nobel Prize in literature for this post? Idiot. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Oregon vs California law graphic
Tom Sherman writes:
Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Bill Zaumen wrote: Tom Sherman writes: Citation? Idiot. Citation? Your comments above will do. Peer reviewed citation? You are an idiot. Zaumen must have a keyboard macro for "You are an idiot". Idiot. Fingers getting tired? Write your macro! Idiot A man of too few words. To what does idiot refer to in this context? Idiot. Help Zaumen - his needle is stuck in a groove! Idiot. Zaumen's command of the English language, as exhibited here, continues to astound. Idiot. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Graphic design jerseys | Mika | Techniques | 3 | June 18th 07 06:37 PM |
World Transport - a great graphic.. | PiledHigher | Australia | 2 | August 28th 06 01:16 PM |
Graphic for muscle recruitment comparing standing/sitting? | [email protected] | Techniques | 5 | June 14th 06 02:06 PM |
Hermiston, Oregon to Hood River, Oregon? | Ted | Rides | 7 | December 4th 05 07:12 AM |