|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quality Control: Not impressed with "Brooks of England"
On Mar 31, 10:37*pm, Lou Holtman wrote:
Andre Jute schreef: "Brooks of England" BROOKS B73 LEATHER SADDLE interrim report by Andre Jute "Not impressed with the quality control" I reported here earlier that my three-helical-coil Brooks B73 saddle, against expectation, doesn't sway at the front. Today I noticed, when I leaned over the saddle in the car park at the mall to unlock the bike, that the nose of the Brooks B73 saddle swayed from side to side. It turned out that the bottom nut holding the spring to the rails was loose and spun nearly off. I probably missed a nasty nutcrusher of an accident by five minutes, which is a call to disaster too close for comfort as earlier I was speeding down long winding downhills and then riding on a very busy main road with my shoulder eighteen inches from speeding trucks, and if in surprise I swerved it could have resulted in a serious, possibly fatal accident. I had the Brooks tension spanner in my toolkit but it doesn't fit... I finger-tightened the nut and rode home (less than a kilometre) slowly, stopping a couple of times to check that the nut wasn't spinning off. At home I determined that the saddle has nine nuts: the tensioning nut, two seatpost clamp nuts which had been correctly tightened by me, and six nuts on the saddle used in the assembly of the saddle that I blithely assumed such a reputable firm as "Brooks of England" would have tightened competently. Inspection quickly showed that of the six assembly nuts, three were loose. This would be unacceptable assembly standards in a third world factory, never mind from a firm that charges premium prices and is proud to do so. I think that for a premium price Brooks ("of England") should deliver a premium product, not something so shoddily put together that it puts the rider's parts and life at risk. I'm not impressed at all. The question arises whether Brooks upholds any tradition "of England" except the postwar one of shoddy workmanship. Read on. ******* There's more. I don't know if the tensioning nut is also supposed to be 13mm (or some close imperial measure) but, if it is, the tensioning spanner Brooks sells in its saddle care kit with the Proofide will not fit it, as it doesn't fit any of the other nuts on the saddle but a proper 13mm spanner does. The problem, even after identifying the correct spanner, is that the saddle's framework and support structure is badly designed, presumably back when labour was cheap, skilled and patient, and didn't talk back to the bosses even when they committed design solecisms; certainly the framework design has not been modernised in the slightest. It would be very easy to replace the smooth-head bolts, presumably tightened into a square cutout, with sunken-hexheads, so that at least one can get a tool in or, alternatively, to sell a spanner flat enough to get in between the springs. And I don't mean that tacky little die-stamped "spanner" Brooks sells to adjust the hammock tension of the leather. Merely to determine whether it is the same size, I put it on the seat post clamp nuts and pulled lightly on it. t immediately started stripping and folding up. It's crap. it might adjust a loose nut on a shaft but it won't handle torqueing up a nut on which, as we have seen, in very common circumstances the rider's life might depend. Instead, Brooks doesn't tell one anywhere that I could find in the literature what size spanner is required. By the time the customer has tried to fit all his likely-looking spanners into the tiny spaces between the springs, the chrome on the springs has become acquainted with the spanner. By the time he has actually tightened a few nuts an eight of a turn at a time before trying to refit the spanner in the tight space inside the helix, the chrome has taken a few hits. I can only say I hope the chromium-plating is of a better standard than Brooks's assembly standards, or I shall shortly have to paint the springs on my brand-new Brooks saddle. The point here is off course that if the chrome is to last the life of a saddle one buys for a lifetime, or even an appreciable part of that time, Brooks should arrange matters so, among other means by proper assembly, that the customer never, ever, brings a tool near the crome, never mind in unavoidable and repeated contact with the chrome. Underneath the chrome is steel; if the chrome is damaged, the steel will rust. ***** One doesn't expect one's bicycle saddle to endanger one's posterity and life through shoddy construction. One expects that if standard tools won't adjust some product, that the manufacturer offers the correct tools in the box or at least optionally as an extra (as does, for instance, Shimano and Rohloff). "Brooks of England" doesn't even meet these minimum expectations. I'm severely brassed off and disappointed at "Brooks of England". Andre Jute Visit Jute on Bicycles at *http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/...20CYCLING.html To write to me, lose the digit 1 from the visible address Andre, you just discovered Englands love of tradition. If it's a crap design in the beginning it stays crap because it's tradition.. Lou Some traditional British products are still good. I use QUAD hi-fi and I used to drive Jensen Interceptors and Bentleys, good products built by craftsmen who take pride in their work. -- AJ |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quality Control: Not impressed with "Brooks of England" | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 22 | April 2nd 09 09:42 PM |
Looking for a "Brooks" like saddle | DanRH | General | 30 | October 26th 07 05:02 PM |
Garage Sale--MAKE OFFERS...Dura-Ace, Ultegra, Stronglight + plenty of commuter-quality "junk" | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | February 14th 07 09:37 PM |
Shimano "high-quality eight-speed brake/shift levers"? | Dave | Techniques | 14 | September 23rd 05 04:12 PM |
"Spring" Brooks Saddles? | Kinon O'Cann | Techniques | 5 | July 29th 05 04:47 AM |