Why Ed Dolan is worthless!

"Edward Dolan" writes crap.

"Not Ed" wrote in message
...
"Edward Dolan" writes crap.

A man of few words and less thought, but do they not go together like ****
and ****?

Note the forged address. What a dunce!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Jun 16, 8:21 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"Not Ed" wrote in message

...

"Edward Dolan" writes crap.

A man of few words and less thought, but do they not go together like ****
and ****?

Note the forged address. What a dunce!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
there? Does this guy ever post anything to do with bikes?

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT), in rec.bicycles.tech
wrote:

I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
there?

Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.

Jones

"!Jones" wrote in message ...
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT), in rec.bicycles.tech
wrote:

I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
there?

Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.

Jones


'Block sender' is useful ... By Jones.

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:03:03 +0100, in rec.bicycles.tech "Colin
Nelson" wrote:


"!Jones" wrote in message ...
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT), in rec.bicycles.tech
wrote:

I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
there?

Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.

Jones


'Block sender' is useful ... By Jones.

I suppose. I've never used it becuase I'm not willing to admit that
*anyone* can get that far under my skin... an ex-wife, maybe, but not
an ASCII stream. Usually, they simply bore me to the point where I'm
no longer motivated to click on their messages, thus "blocking"
themselves.

Personally, I prefer someone who ****es me off and challenges my world
view, Every now and then, someone on Usenet will do so... mostly it's
mindless noise, but I read hoping someone will astound me.

Jones

I suppose. I've never used it becuase I'm not willing to admit that
*anyone* can get that far under my skin... an ex-wife, maybe, but not
an ASCII stream. Usually, they simply bore me to the point where I'm
no longer motivated to click on their messages, thus "blocking"
themselves.

Personally, I prefer someone who ****es me off and challenges my world
view, Every now and then, someone on Usenet will do so... mostly it's
mindless noise, but I read hoping someone will astound me.

Jones

Okay, here's the problem. People have that idiot in their killfiles and
avoid reading posts by someone who simply reposts what the idiot's
rant-of-the-day happens to be. So, you just might wind up in killfiles as
well---the killfiles of people who will come to associate your name with
reposting the idiot's rants. You may write many cogent posts, but nobody
will read them because they'll be leary of being exposed to the idiot. It's
a circle, but there it is.....

Pat in TX