A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Social Issues
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 7th 09, 06:31 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:52:56 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 5, 5:26*am, Kayak44 wrote:
OnFeb4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:





On Wed, 4Feb200916:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44


wrote:
OnFeb3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 3Feb200905:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane


wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
\"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here
since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I
believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and
water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with
riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't
see us. *I rest my case."


2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those
animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of
trying to get them banned.


Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever
they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH!


But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans,
these are not native horses, thus they do not belong.


We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to
restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them.


Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it.

Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses.


If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this
planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish.

Selfish people like mountain bikers can't understand doing anything to benefit some
one else, or wildlife.


See above.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



Not funny. Polio still exist. Many that contracted it are now
experiencing a secondary reoccurance of it. Also, NO vaccine is 100%
effective. This has happened to some of my patients.


Whom are you talkig to?
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
Ads
  #22  
Old February 7th 09, 03:18 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Kayak44
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails

On Feb 6, 11:52*pm, wrote:
On Feb 5, 5:26*am, Kayak44 wrote:





OnFeb4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:


On Wed, 4Feb200916:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44


wrote:
OnFeb3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 3Feb200905:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane


wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
\"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here
since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I
believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and
water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with
riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't
see us. *I rest my case."


2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those
animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of
trying to get them banned.


Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever
they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH!


But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans,
these are not native horses, thus they do not belong.


We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to
restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them.


Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it.


Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses.


If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this
planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish.


Selfish people like mountain bikers can't understand doing anything to benefit some
one else, or wildlife.


See above.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Not funny. Polio still exist. Many that contracted it are now
experiencing a secondary reoccurance of it. Also, NO vaccine is 100%
effective. This has happened to some of my patients.- Hide quoted text -


Try and get the true point here before making assumptions that it was
an attempt at humor.

Of course it's not funny, it's absurd, but even more absurd is Michael
J. Vandemans response to the suggestion, he said "Yes, of course. But
humans are too selfish to do so."

Someone makes a totally absurd suggestion ( to make a point) and
another actually agrees with it, that's where you should be focusing
at this point, "PhD believes we should restore polio".
  #23  
Old February 7th 09, 09:21 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails

On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:18:42 -0800 (PST), Kayak44
wrote:

On Feb 6, 11:52*pm, wrote:
On Feb 5, 5:26*am, Kayak44 wrote:





OnFeb4, 11:54*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:


On Wed, 4Feb200916:18:31 -0800 (PST), Kayak44


wrote:
OnFeb3, 9:01*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 3Feb200905:50:45 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane


wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
\"I have lived in Marin since the 50s and have been riding horses here
since 1962. *I would like to share two of my experiences of why I
believe that horses and bicycles on single track trails are oil and
water. *snip BSTwo horses weighting 1000 lbs. with
riders perched on top, making them about 7 ft. tall and she couldn't
see us. *I rest my case."


2000 lbs of horses on a trail, imagine the damage cause by those
animals and yet Michael J. Vandeman is defending them instead of
trying to get them banned.


Horses are native to North America and have a right to go wherever
they like. Bikes have no rights whatsoever. DUH!


But you claimed the native horses were wiped out by early humans,
these are not native horses, thus they do not belong.


We need to restore the horse to North America, just as we need to
restore the grizzly to California, because we wiped out both of them.


Maybe we should also restore polio while we're at it.


Humans belong here a heck of a lot less than horses.


If you really believed that, you would have removed yourself from this
planet a long time ago. You're still around because you are selfish.


Selfish people like mountain bikers can't understand doing anything to benefit some
one else, or wildlife.


See above.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Not funny. Polio still exist. Many that contracted it are now
experiencing a secondary reoccurance of it. Also, NO vaccine is 100%
effective. This has happened to some of my patients.- Hide quoted text -


Try and get the true point here before making assumptions that it was
an attempt at humor.

Of course it's not funny, it's absurd, but even more absurd is Michael
J. Vandemans response to the suggestion, he said "Yes, of course. But
humans are too selfish to do so."

Someone makes a totally absurd suggestion ( to make a point) and
another actually agrees with it, that's where you should be focusing
at this point, "PhD believes we should restore polio".


You make no sense whatsoever. Try writing in English.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  #24  
Old February 12th 09, 03:04 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Chris[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 275
Default How the Typical Environmentalist Treats Horses Damaging Trails

On Feb 7, 1:21*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
You make no sense whatsoever. Try writing in English.


Mike, you cannot successfully debate the merits of own points, flawed
as they are, let alone refute the merits of someone else's points. You
should avoid ad hominem arguments, although it would also silence you
if you did.

Chris
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How the Typical Mountain Biker Treats Horses and Other Trail Users Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 50 February 14th 09 05:18 AM
How the Typical Mountain Biker Treats Horses and Other TrailUsers bluezfolk Social Issues 3 February 14th 09 05:18 AM
How the Typical Mountain Biker Treats Horses and Other Trail Users Mike Vandeman Social Issues 0 February 3rd 09 04:15 AM
Typical Mountain Biker Admits Riding Illegal Trails Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 3 March 22nd 08 01:02 PM
Typical Mountain Biker Admits Riding Illegal Trails Mike Vandeman Social Issues 3 March 22nd 08 01:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.