|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie query re rim width vs. tire width (longish)
I have had a new Trek 7.5 FX for about a week now. Stock wheels are
Bontrager SSR and tires are 700x32 Bontrager Race Lite Hardcase (road slicks). I bought this bike planning to ride about 95% pavement and 5% unpaved (mostly smooth hardpack with/without minimal loose surface grit), and with that in mind planned to get a wider tire with tread, something like a Bontrager Invert or Continental Travel Contact, in a 35-37 mm width. So I get the bike and there's a clicking sound when using the rear brake. Turns out there's a rim defect - a big misalignment where the two ends of the formerly-straight piece of rim meet.. My LBS looked at it, didn't like the front rims either, and got Trek to send replacement wheels gratis, and they are the "Select" wheels, an upgrade ... sweet.. But now the new wheels have arrived, and yesterday I got to measure the interior rim width, which is 15mm (distance between the flanges). And from what I could tell without removing the tires, the old SSR rims had approximately the same exterior width. Can I safely use the wider tires on these rims? According to the chart at http://sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html#width (not sure this link will go to the right place, on the page, but just scroll down to the chart at the bottom) the 32s are about as wide as I can go. But Brown does say this chart is rather conservative, and it comes from a site that appears to be tandem-centric (thus more weight is a concern - I'm a Clydesdale at 215, but I imagine most mixed gender couples outweigh me 8-). Trek has at least one bike which comes stock with SSR wheels and the Bontrager Invert 700x35s. And the Trek rep assured my LBS I could put 37s on the stock wheels. Still, I'm a little nervous about this and would like some reassurance. I could look for a treaded tire in a 32, but I'm wanting to use the guidelines at http://www.rivbike.com/files/pick_tire.html , though these may be somewhat conservative as well. Happy riding (and/or wrenching), and thanks for any advice ... Don in Denver |
Ads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie query re rim width vs. tire width (longish)
On 8 Apr., 21:43, wrote:
I bought this bike planning to ride about 95% pavement and 5% unpaved (mostly smooth hardpack with/without minimal loose surface grit), and with that in mind planned to get a wider tire with tread, something like a Bontrager Invert or Continental Travel Contact, in a 35-37 mm width. My recommendation would be to keep the wheels and slick tires. You will be surprised on how well slicks perform on unpaved roads like the ones you describe. Can I safely use the wider tires on these rims? According to the chart at http://sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html#width the 32s are about as wide as I can go. I wouldn't do it. You will be better off with new rims if you want 37 mm tires. I could look for a treaded tire in a 32, but I'm wanting to use the guidelines at http://www.rivbike.com/files/pick_tire.html, I like Rivendell bikes, but forget about that chart. People as heavy as you rides just fine on narrow 23 mm tires without their wheels being destroyed. You don't _need_ 37 mm tires just because you are a Clyde and do some light unpaved road riding. Off course, only you can decide what tire with and what tire pressure feels good for you. But at least try to gain some riding experience on your present wheelset and tires before spending money. -- Regards Peter S. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie query re rim width vs. tire width (longish)
On 8 Apr 2007 12:43:38 -0700, wrote:
But now the new wheels have arrived, and yesterday I got to measure the interior rim width, which is 15mm (distance between the flanges). And from what I could tell without removing the tires, the old SSR rims had approximately the same exterior width. Can I safely use the wider tires on these rims? According to the chart at http://sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html#width (not sure this link will go to the right place, on the page, but just scroll down to the chart at the bottom) the 32s are about as wide as I can go. But Brown does say this chart is rather conservative, and it comes from a site that appears to be tandem-centric (thus more weight is a concern - I'm a Clydesdale at 215, but I imagine most mixed gender couples outweigh me 8-). Trek has at least one bike which comes stock with SSR wheels and the Bontrager Invert 700x35s. And the Trek rep assured my LBS I could put 37s on the stock wheels. Still, I'm a little nervous about this and would like some reassurance. I've been using Conti SportContact 700x37 on Shimano R500 rims, which are only 13mm between flanges, for a couple of years. I'm 200+ and ride about 70/30 road/hardpack. From my experience, I'd say don't worry too much about fitting wide tyre to narrow rims, as long as you don't plan to run low pressures where the wider base really does make a difference to tyre stability. Also, don't bother with a tread unless you ride in mud - if you can't see the tread pattern in the mark you make on the ground, it's not doing anything other than reducing the amount of rubber in contact with the road. Kinky Cowboy* *Batteries not included May contain traces of nuts Your milage may vary |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie query re rim width vs. tire width (longish)
On 8 Apr 2007 12:43:38 -0700, wrote:
I have had a new Trek 7.5 FX for about a week now. Stock wheels are Bontrager SSR and tires are 700x32 Bontrager Race Lite Hardcase (road slicks). I bought this bike planning to ride about 95% pavement and 5% unpaved (mostly smooth hardpack with/without minimal loose surface grit), and with that in mind planned to get a wider tire with tread, something like a Bontrager Invert or Continental Travel Contact, in a 35-37 mm width. [snip] Trek has at least one bike which comes stock with SSR wheels and the Bontrager Invert 700x35s. And the Trek rep assured my LBS I could put 37s on the stock wheels. Still, I'm a little nervous about this and would like some reassurance. I could look for a treaded tire in a 32, but I'm wanting to use the guidelines at http://www.rivbike.com/files/pick_tire.html , though these may be somewhat conservative as well. Happy riding (and/or wrenching), and thanks for any advice ... Don in Denver Don, FWIW: I ride a tandem and our combined rider weight is about 300 lbs, and we have also pulled a loaded BOB trailer. (I would not be surprised to discover that we have had as much as 200 lbs on the rear wheel when we pulled our trailer.) We run slicks in a 1.25" (32mm) size on a 26" wheel at about 90-100psi and have no complaints, especially considering the price tag of under $20 a piece. I replace these tires about every 3,000 miles. We also ride mostly on pavement but occasionally ride on hard packed gravel (such as the Katy Trail in Missouri) and have been happy with the slicks. I have not felt the need to consider a treaded tire for any of the conditions in which we have ridden. Cheers, Harry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saddle Width Vs. Sit Bones Width? | [email protected] | General | 0 | August 9th 06 06:54 AM |
Saddle Width Vs. Sit Bones Width? | David L. Johnson | General | 1 | August 9th 06 03:39 AM |
Saddle Width Vs. Sit Bones Width? | Tom Keats | General | 0 | August 7th 06 03:24 AM |
MTB - Rim width vs. Tire width | Ned Mantei | Techniques | 5 | July 11th 04 12:01 AM |
Matching tire width to rim width. | mscalisi | Unicycling | 4 | April 15th 04 05:48 PM |