Oh dear! Another pavement motorist crashes into a house.

Luckily no cyclists were involved this time but it does show the sheer force
of a crashing car which can seriously damage a house. No pavement cyclist
could ever cause this much damage with a bicycle. It follows that cars are
much, much more dangerous than bicycles and that is why motorists need to be
much more strictly regulated than cyclists.

"An 18 year-old-man is in hospital with serious head injuries after the
stolen car he was driving crashed into a house in Bradford.

The incident happened in Reevey Road in the Buttershaw area at about 03:00
GMT on Saturday.

The car clipped other parked vehicles before hitting the detached house,
which was badly damaged.

The house's residents have been moved out and structural engineers are at
the scene."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-15804500


-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

"Doug" wrote in message ...

Luckily no cyclists were involved this time but it does show the sheer force
of a crashing car which can seriously damage a house. No pavement cyclist
could ever cause this much damage with a bicycle. It follows that cars are
much, much more dangerous than bicycles and that is why motorists need to be
much more strictly regulated than cyclists.

"An 18 year-old-man is in hospital with serious head injuries after the
stolen car he was driving crashed into a house in Bradford.

The incident happened in Reevey Road in the Buttershaw area at about 03:00
GMT on Saturday.

The car clipped other parked vehicles before hitting the detached house,
which was badly damaged.

The house's residents have been moved out and structural engineers are at
the scene."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-15804500

===============================================

Yet another?!

On 20/11/2011 08:25, Doug wrote:
Luckily no cyclists were involved this time but it does show the sheer force
of a crashing car which can seriously damage a house. No pavement cyclist
could ever cause this much damage with a bicycle. It follows that cars are
much, much more dangerous than bicycles and that is why motorists need to be
much more strictly regulated than cyclists.

"An 18 year-old-man is in hospital with serious head injuries after the
stolen car he was driving crashed into a house in Bradford.

The incident happened in Reevey Road in the Buttershaw area at about 03:00
GMT on Saturday.

The car clipped other parked vehicles before hitting the detached house,
which was badly damaged.

The house's residents have been moved out and structural engineers are at
the scene."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-15804500


-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

There should be a law against it, I will write to the Mail at once.

On 20/11/2011 08:25, Doug wrote:

The usual bollox.
--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:45:49 +0000, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:

On 20/11/2011 08:25, Doug wrote:

The usual bollox.

I agree.



--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

On 20-Nov-2011, Tony Dragon wrote:

On 20/11/2011 08:25, Doug wrote:
Luckily no cyclists were involved this time but it does show the sheer
force
of a crashing car which can seriously damage a house. No pavement
cyclist
could ever cause this much damage with a bicycle. It follows that cars
are
much, much more dangerous than bicycles and that is why motorists need
to be
much more strictly regulated than cyclists.

"An 18 year-old-man is in hospital with serious head injuries after the
stolen car he was driving crashed into a house in Bradford.

The incident happened in Reevey Road in the Buttershaw area at about
03:00
GMT on Saturday.

The car clipped other parked vehicles before hitting the detached house,
which was badly damaged.

The house's residents have been moved out and structural engineers are
at
the scene."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-15804500



There should be a law against it, I will write to the Mail at once.

Depends on whether it is regarded as an unavoidable 'accident' or not.
Pavement motorists seem to be allowed to do as they like as long as it is
not deliberate. In this case presumably the insurance, if the driver has
one, will cover any resulting costs.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

"Mr. Benn" wrote in message
...
"Doug" wrote in message ...

It follows that cars are
much, much more dangerous than bicycles and that is why motorists need to
be
much more strictly regulated than cyclists.

Which they are.

"GT" wrote in message
eb.com...
"Mr. Benn" wrote in message
...
"Doug" wrote in message ...

It follows that cars are
much, much more dangerous than bicycles and that is why motorists need to
be
much more strictly regulated than cyclists.

Which they are.


I didn't say that. Doug did.

On 21/11/2011 08:19, Doug wrote:
On 20-Nov-2011, Tony wrote:

On 20/11/2011 08:25, Doug wrote:
Luckily no cyclists were involved this time but it does show the sheer
force
of a crashing car which can seriously damage a house. No pavement
cyclist
could ever cause this much damage with a bicycle. It follows that cars
are
much, much more dangerous than bicycles and that is why motorists need
to be
much more strictly regulated than cyclists.

"An 18 year-old-man is in hospital with serious head injuries after the
stolen car he was driving crashed into a house in Bradford.

The incident happened in Reevey Road in the Buttershaw area at about
03:00
GMT on Saturday.

The car clipped other parked vehicles before hitting the detached house,
which was badly damaged.

The house's residents have been moved out and structural engineers are
at
the scene."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-15804500



There should be a law against it, I will write to the Mail at once.

Depends on whether it is regarded as an unavoidable 'accident' or not.
Pavement motorists seem to be allowed to do as they like as long as it is
not deliberate.

Doug...

Please, please, THINK before posting.

"Doing what [you] like" more or less has to be deliberate.

Doing something accidentally (ie, involuntarily) is more or less the
antithesis of doing what you like.

Come on; you can do better than your current mangling of the language.

"Doug" wrote in message
...


Depends on whether it is regarded as an unavoidable 'accident' or not.
Pavement motorists seem to be allowed to do as they like as long as it is
not deliberate. In this case presumably the insurance, if the driver has
one, will cover any resulting costs.


Not around here they are not.
Pavement parkers are being actively targetted by the local plod.
I won't post the police letter again as apparently it was found guilty of
repetition.


--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/