Contador the lesser of two evils

"Simon Brooke" wrote in message
...
in message om,
') wrote:

On Jul 27, 5:57 am, mrsixtypercent wrote:
If Chicken rode for Discovery do you think Bruyneel would have
dismissed him for going walkabout in Italy - no way.

dumbass,

i'll keep saying it. rasmussen didn't get fired just for visiting
italy. there's is dirt on him and the team and the UCI want to avoid a
full blown doping scandal.

So you keep saying. Show us the evidence, or shut up.

Have you heard a peep from the chicken since it happened?

I thought the same thing as soon as I heard it. No way Rabobank would kick
him while leading unless they were pretty sure he'd be involved in some
serious scandal in the near future. As un-likely as it may seem, perhaps
team management wasn't aware of his program. Or, perhaps they fully knew
his program and that he would get nailed quick. Either way, they obviously
thought that washing their hands of him was a much better move than letting
him win the tour.

-Andy B.

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:02:34 -0700, Michael Press wrote:

In article
. com,
mrsixtypercent wrote:

If Chicken rode for Discovery do you think Bruyneel would have
dismissed him for going walkabout in Italy - no way. Contador a former
protege of Saiz, implicated in Puerto and now riding for the dirtiest
team in cycling. Contador the lesser of two evils or the evil of two
lessers?

Until further notice Discovery Channel Pro Cycling Team
is among the cleanest in professional cycling so shut
your pie hole.

ASO and the TdF sure hope so, because a hell of a lot of people had to get
kicked out for them to win. To have someone come up dirty after this mess would
be sorta like running outside to rescue the bathwater.

Ron

Andy B. wrote:

Have you heard a peep from the chicken since it happened?

He will apaer in a long interview on danish TV2 at 20:00 CET

--
Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) http://blog.reippuert.dk

Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.