#241
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 08/08/18 21:38, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 21:17:51 +0100, TMS320 wrote: On 08/08/18 20:43, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 19:20:56 +0100, TMS320 wrote: *It is a special case when stationary. *Why are you making so much fuss about the "correct use of a horn"? OCD is a DISORDER.* Get it fixed. Why do you make so much fuss about "correct use of a indicators"?* OCD is a DISORDER.* Get it fixed. Perhaps you mean something like this? It is is harder seen from a driver's perspective than from a high mounted camera. No need. Adjust speed according to what can be seen. *https://goo.gl/maps/9MSMX69BxzM2 https://goo.gl/maps/R48YMSxzjQk *Incidentally, the bridge has a 2t mgw limit so several drivers shown here are breaking the rules - plus many others plus a council official with a Range Rover that knows full well. *WTF are you on about?* I can clearly see what's coming the other way, *that is not a blind bridge whatsoever.* Unless it's because the camera is higher up than most drivers. Cast your eyes up a few lines... Try waffling less.* So what was your point?* I never hoot at those.* I just slow down. I said above "It is is harder seen from a driver's perspective than from a high mounted camera" and "no need" [to hoot]. Then you pondered about the height of the camera. Don't complain about waffle when you can't follow through properly. If the horn was not so unpleasant, the administrators that defined the 90dbA standard understood physics and the pad on the steering wheel was force sensing to allow the driver to add expression it might be more acceptable. *What do you mean?* Are you suggesting it should be louder if you press harder? Quieter if tapped softly. That would just make them go unnoticed. A horn should always be as loud as possible to inform the arsehole that he failed to drive correctly. Shrug. If that is what you want then press it normally. |
Ads |
#242
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 08/08/18 21:42, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 21:09:45 +0100, TMS320 wrote: On 08/08/18 20:44, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 20:41:27 +0100, TMS320 wrote: On 08/08/18 19:21, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 15:24:39 +0100, TMS320 wrote: On 07/08/18 18:29, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 15:27:28 +0100, JNugent wrote: It is intended only to alert other road-users to one's presence. Er no. It means "You ****ing arsehole, why the hell didn't you indicate?!" *A horn conveys no information so how are your targets supposed to know what your problem is? *Well let me see, Mr Smith turns right at a roundabout without indicating, and someone correctly pulls in front of him, then sounds their horn when they see he's about to collide with them. He can then look up the highway code or whatever and find out why the other car had the right of way. Just because Mr Smith is not indicating right it is not correct for AN Other to pull out on a whim. Too many hims and thems. Explain who is doing what and who ends up in front of whom. *If you don't indicate right at a roundabout, you do not have the right to turn right.* WTF are you doing turning without informing other road users as to where you intend to go? When following marked lanes indication is not necessary. Indication is only useful when making lane changes or where there is ambiguity. And I live in the south east where most people adapt to cope with each others' behaviour without going into a hissy fit at every opportunity. Please explain your scenario in more detail. Now think of a roundabout without lanes.* Or maybe one with two entry lanes and three exits.* And don't assume that cars at the other side can tell what lane you're in. Still not enough information. Every roundabout is different. No mention of timing and you don't say which driver ends up aiming at the other driver's doors. No indicator means you're going straight ahead, end of story. Straight on from where? Once a roundabout is more than a certain size the relationship between entry and exit becomes completely irrelevant. You seem to be just trying to make a point rather than trying to work out how to use a roundabout in the most efficient way for the circumstances you find at the time. It is not intended to convey the message: "Get out of my way or there might be a crash". I such circumstances, you are supposed to slow down or stop. I don't, I drive as close as possible to the vehicle without touching them, this scares them into not doing it again, *Have you ever followed up the result of your education with the individuals concerned? *Yes, I often have people banging on my door yelling at me. I had a bus driver sacked for doing just that, after not indicating and deciding he had priority over cars at a junction. So the answer is that you don't know that your education works. *Try that again in English. It's good enough. I told you that a bus driver was sacked due to his inabilities.* And you reply with the nonsense, "So the answer is that you don't know that your education works" - what is that supposed to mean? A sacking is not evidence of altered behaviour. |
#243
|
|||
|
|||
Troll-feeding Senile Idiot Alert!
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:05:01 +0100, TMS320, the moronic troll-feeding senile
idiot, blabbered again: FLUSH the senile cretin's senile drivel Gee... yet another senile braindead idiot who doesn't get what's going on! tsk |
#244
|
|||
|
|||
Troll-feeding Senile Idiot Alert!
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:04:45 +0100, TMS320, the moronic troll-feeding senile
idiot, blabbered again: Try waffling less.* So what was your point?* I never hoot at those.* I just slow down. I said above Nobody gives a ****, senile one! Not even the troll that thrives on your feeding him! Idiot! |
#245
|
|||
|
|||
Everyone KEEPS having Endless Fun Beating the **** out of Poor Helpless Gay Goran Razovic! LOL
"%" wrote in message ... On 2018-08-06 11:03 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:38:50 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:22:34 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:23:56 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 3:52 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 19:22:26 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 17:03:08 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 9:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:25:42 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:13:03 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 05:58:59 +0100, David wrote: its debbie's foot Who is Debbie and how many feet is her foot? 9 Doesn't that make her tread on her own toes? I wear a 10 1/2. Size is not equal to length of foot in feet. yes it is Anyone with a 10.5 foot foot would only be able to get work as a clown. my foot size is 10 1/2" in size " isn't feet. ' is feet. i foot is one foot , two feet is two feet , when you catch a fish , one foot is three feet There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore looking like an idiot. I have excitement. Is your rod erect? what kind of rod? I don't want to examine your tool that closely. try some bait on the end on your line you mean like a blurted word? |
#246
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 08.08.2018 20:24, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 09:44:19 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 07.08.2018 19:24, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 09:17:53 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 06.08.2018 20:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 09:16:17 +0100, Bod wrote: He can afford a car yet uses a bicycle, that's gross stupidity. Â*Thanks greatly for the excellent compliment coming from YOU. My bike is an excellent convenient healthy exhilarating convenient economical viable means of transport. It really is a very great compliment to be called grossly stupid by YOU. Especially by YOU. And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that,Â* that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Â* Cyclists v drivers? They're often the same people. Much has been written about a war between cyclists and drivers, as if the two groups were such polar opposites that they could never cross in a Venn diagram. But according to new research, people who cycle the most are likely to own at least two cars. Regular cyclists – those who cycle at least once a week – are also disproportionately likely to read broadsheet newspapers, be well educated, have a household income of at least £50,000 per year and shop at Waitrose, claims the latest Mintel report, Bicycles in the UK 2010. In addition, they are twice as likely to be men as women. https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ng-boom-survey Â*I guess the Guardian is wrong then, or cyclists wouldn't yell at drivers all the time. I don't yell at drivers all the time. I use my voice like a car uses (or is supposed to use) a horn; as a warning that unless someone does some kind of avoiding manoeuvre, a clash may happen. Note, it is only an indecipherable shout; not an oath or plashemy or foul language or insult or something. Â*Funny, I've never had to yell at a motorist on my bike, maybe you should cycle more carefully? I sometimes have to, but usually I find I am acknowledging their courtesy. Maybe that is why I am still alive and uninjured. Why would you yell to acknowledge courtesy? There is the word 'but' in there somewhere. |
#247
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 08.08.2018 20:25, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 09:47:18 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 07.08.2018 19:23, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 17:58:57 +0100, Bod wrote: On 07/08/2018 15:44, JNugent wrote: On 07/08/2018 15:34, Bod wrote: On 07/08/2018 15:28, JNugent wrote: On 07/08/2018 09:20, Bod wrote: Â* Cyclists v drivers? They're often the same people. Much has been written about a war between cyclists and drivers, as if the two groups were such polar opposites that they could never cross in a Venn diagram. But according to new research, people who cycle the most are likely to own at least two cars. Regular cyclists – those who cycle at least once a week – are also disproportionately likely to read broadsheet newspapers, be well educated, have a household income of at least £50,000 per year and shop at Waitrose, claims the latest Mintel report, Bicycles in the UK 2010. In addition, they are twice as likely to be men as women. https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ng-boom-survey I just use a bike mostly because it is most convenient, I love the fresh air and feeling of movement and exercise, and .... Owning a car and being rich has nothing to do with it. Â* Â* Of course, money is irellevant. Is it? So why did you mention it? Â* Â* I didn't.Â* I just showed you a report from a link, which was basically the reporter's opinions. Â*That's an entertaining wriggle. Â* Â* State where I mentioned money! Â*You quoted a foul mouthed **** faced whining little journalist. Journalists should never ever be trusted. That is why when I watch news programmes I concentrate on the rolling ticker=tape at the bottom. That is just news without comment. I can do without the comments and bloody interviews and all that. Anybody who pays for news is contributing to the slimy little ****es. One day soon they'll all go out of business. Unfortunately no. There e two many people hanging on every word of foul commentary they can that the news stations make heaps from the associated advertising they can sell. |
#248
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 08.08.2018 20:26, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 09:45:07 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 07.08.2018 10:20, Bod wrote: Â* Cyclists v drivers? They're often the same people. Much has been written about a war between cyclists and drivers, as if the two groups were such polar opposites that they could never cross in a Venn diagram. But according to new research, people who cycle the most are likely to own at least two cars. Regular cyclists – those who cycle at least once a week – are also disproportionately likely to read broadsheet newspapers, be well educated, have a household income of at least £50,000 per year and shop at Waitrose, claims the latest Mintel report, Bicycles in the UK 2010. In addition, they are twice as likely to be men as women. https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ng-boom-survey I just use a bike mostly because it is most convenient, I love the fresh air and feeling of movement and exercise, and .... Owning a car and being rich has nothing to do with it. Â* Â* Of course, money is irellevant. Of course. Exactly. I enjoy cycling in the countryside.Â* Cycling on roads isn't enjoyable. I find it is. Very enjoyable. |
#249
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 08.08.2018 21:23, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
you silly little pansy. I take that as a real compliment coming from YOU. |
#250
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 16:16:33 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote: On 08.08.2018 21:23, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: you silly little pansy. I take that as a real compliment coming from YOU. Look, if you want to ask me out, just say so. How big is the bulge in your lycra shorts? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stolen bike.... anyone want to bet on it? | Anton Berlin | Racing | 0 | December 22nd 09 07:30 PM |
Shelly Olds...bike stolen, bike found, gold medal won | caffetrieste | Racing | 20 | October 14th 08 09:39 AM |
Stolen bike | Chris A | UK | 26 | March 27th 07 03:01 PM |
nearly stolen bike | Simon Brooke | UK | 0 | November 18th 05 10:16 PM |
nearly stolen bike | nobody760 | UK | 6 | November 17th 05 08:05 AM |