#31
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
"thirty-six" wrote in message ... As far as I can see, the police colluded in this crime, rather than doing their duty and bringing the criminal to justice. There were a number of serious crimes with which she could have been charged, including manslaughter. If she had reported the collision promptly so that medical aid could have been dispatched immediately, it is possible that her victim may have survived. She alone was responsible for the delay, and should therefore be held liable for the consequences. Should it not be the chief constable who is brought to court for these repeated acts by crown officers in support of these evil deeds. In the parlance of westminster, an accessory to murder. Do they not swear an oath to uphold justice and yet they hide these all-too-common crimes? Everyday it becomes more and more clear to me that detection, arrest and prosecution comes after tax collecting for these monkies. Too right - at work if we breach our effluent consent limit, the site manager can find himself in jail even though it could have been me that cocked up the analysis. I would get a bollocking, but he can be put in the slammer as the buck stops with him. -- Simon Mason |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
On Sun, 13 May 2012 16:24:58 -0700 (PDT), thirty-six
wrote: snip Should it not be the chief constable who is brought to court for these repeated acts by crown officers in support of these evil deeds. In the parlance of westminster, an accessory to murder. Do they not swear an oath to uphold justice and yet they hide these all-too-common crimes? I wonder - do you sometimes post using the name Phil W Lee? |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:24:21 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks wrote:
On May 10, 7:14*am, NM wrote: On May 9, 9:40*pm, Judith wrote: Saw part of the program on BBC2 tonight. The police were called to an accident on the A10 * - at night - *thought to be involving a cyclist. As the officer said - the A10 is an unlit dual carriage way with no street lights and fast traffic *- it is not place for cyclists. I quite agree. What is frightening is hurtling up at night on a poorly lit cyclist with a speed differential of about 50 mph. there is a case for banning cyclists from fast moving dual carriageways as on motorways, all it needs is some moron 'taking the lane' to cause a crash with the resultant damage and delays to the vehicle concerned. Your prejudice against cyclists is nauseating, although no more so than a series of other unfortunate posters round here. Why do any of you bother? How does cycling really affect you in any negative way? i see the child has changed the headers again. If you are referring to Simon Mason, then I agree that he is not helping his case by doing this. However, one can understand why he has been driven to it when there are so many trolls on this newsgroup who are only here to post anti-cycling rhetoric. He does only do it when a troll starts a thread. Other than that, he tolerates disagreement better than most. Could you define what you mean by troll please? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
On 15/05/2012 18:42, Simon Mason wrote:
Too right - at work if we breach our effluent consent limit, the site manager can find himself in jail even though it could have been me that cocked up the analysis. Shame there isn't an effluent consent limit on the ****e you post. -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
On May 15, 6:42*pm, "Simon Mason"
wrote: "thirty-six" wrote in message ... As far as I can see, the police colluded in this crime, rather than doing their duty and bringing the criminal to justice. There were a number of serious crimes with which she could have been charged, including manslaughter. *If she had reported the collision promptly so that medical aid could have been dispatched immediately, it is possible that her victim may have survived. *She alone was responsible for the delay, and should therefore be held liable for the consequences. Should it not be the chief constable who is brought to court for these repeated acts by crown officers in support of these evil deeds. *In the parlance of westminster, an accessory to murder. * Do they not swear an oath to uphold justice and yet they hide these all-too-common crimes? * Everyday it becomes more and more clear to me that detection, arrest and prosecution comes after tax collecting for these monkies. Too right - at work if we breach our effluent consent limit, the site manager can find himself in jail even though it could have been me that cocked up the analysis. There should be checks put in place, especially if 'one' considers your public history. ;-) I would get a bollocking, but he can be put in the slammer as the buck stops with him. Ha ha, how much was the secured loan you made to him? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
On May 15, 8:26*pm, Judith wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:24:21 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks wrote: On May 10, 7:14*am, NM wrote: On May 9, 9:40*pm, Judith wrote: Saw part of the program on BBC2 tonight. The police were called to an accident on the A10 * - at night - *thought to be involving a cyclist. As the officer said - the A10 is an unlit dual carriage way with no street lights and fast traffic *- it is not place for cyclists. I quite agree. What is frightening is hurtling up at night on a poorly lit cyclist with a speed differential of about 50 mph. there is a case for banning cyclists from fast moving dual carriageways as on motorways, all it needs is some moron 'taking the lane' to cause a crash with the resultant damage and delays to the vehicle concerned. Your prejudice against cyclists is nauseating, although no more so than a series of other unfortunate posters round here. Why do any of you bother? How does cycling really affect you in any negative way? i see the child has changed the headers again. If you are referring to Simon Mason, then I agree that he is not helping his case by doing this. However, one can understand why he has been driven to it when there are so many trolls on this newsgroup who are only here to post anti-cycling rhetoric. He does only do it when a troll starts a thread. Other than that, he tolerates disagreement better than most. Could you define what you mean by troll please? You. You are a troll, and you know it. For some reason you seem to derive a worrying amount of pleasure from it. Is annoying cyclists you don't even know /really/ the best possible use of your time that you can find? I will pray for you at church tomorrow. I would imagine that you have suffered great trauma in the past which you are now repressing and taking out on cyclists for some reason. It needs to stop, Judith, for both your sake and others'. If you find God then it will make you strong enough to beat this. I hope that you do. It is never too late to repent. God loves you, but he hates your sins, particularly your Tourette's-like swearing. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
"M Wicks" wrote in message
... On May 15, 8:26 pm, Judith wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:24:21 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks wrote: On May 10, 7:14 am, NM wrote: On May 9, 9:40 pm, Judith wrote: Saw part of the program on BBC2 tonight. The police were called to an accident on the A10 - at night - thought to be involving a cyclist. As the officer said - the A10 is an unlit dual carriage way with no street lights and fast traffic - it is not place for cyclists. I quite agree. What is frightening is hurtling up at night on a poorly lit cyclist with a speed differential of about 50 mph. there is a case for banning cyclists from fast moving dual carriageways as on motorways, all it needs is some moron 'taking the lane' to cause a crash with the resultant damage and delays to the vehicle concerned. Your prejudice against cyclists is nauseating, although no more so than a series of other unfortunate posters round here. Why do any of you bother? How does cycling really affect you in any negative way? i see the child has changed the headers again. If you are referring to Simon Mason, then I agree that he is not helping his case by doing this. However, one can understand why he has been driven to it when there are so many trolls on this newsgroup who are only here to post anti-cycling rhetoric. He does only do it when a troll starts a thread. Other than that, he tolerates disagreement better than most. Could you define what you mean by troll please? You. You are a troll, and you know it. For some reason you seem to derive a worrying amount of pleasure from it. Is annoying cyclists you don't even know /really/ the best possible use of your time that you can find? I will pray for you at church tomorrow. ================================== Oh please God, help us! Another one. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
On Sat, 19 May 2012 03:13:36 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks wrote:
On May 15, 8:26*pm, Judith wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:24:21 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks wrote: On May 10, 7:14*am, NM wrote: On May 9, 9:40*pm, Judith wrote: Saw part of the program on BBC2 tonight. The police were called to an accident on the A10 * - at night - *thought to be involving a cyclist. As the officer said - the A10 is an unlit dual carriage way with no street lights and fast traffic *- it is not place for cyclists. I quite agree. What is frightening is hurtling up at night on a poorly lit cyclist with a speed differential of about 50 mph. there is a case for banning cyclists from fast moving dual carriageways as on motorways, all it needs is some moron 'taking the lane' to cause a crash with the resultant damage and delays to the vehicle concerned. Your prejudice against cyclists is nauseating, although no more so than a series of other unfortunate posters round here. Why do any of you bother? How does cycling really affect you in any negative way? i see the child has changed the headers again. If you are referring to Simon Mason, then I agree that he is not helping his case by doing this. However, one can understand why he has been driven to it when there are so many trolls on this newsgroup who are only here to post anti-cycling rhetoric. He does only do it when a troll starts a thread. Other than that, he tolerates disagreement better than most. Could you define what you mean by troll please? You. You are a troll, and you know it. For some reason you seem to derive a worrying amount of pleasure from it. Is annoying cyclists you don't even know /really/ the best possible use of your time that you can find? I will pray for you at church tomorrow. I would imagine that you have suffered great trauma in the past which you are now repressing and taking out on cyclists for some reason. It needs to stop, Judith, for both your sake and others'. If you find God then it will make you strong enough to beat this. I hope that you do. It is never too late to repent. God loves you, but he hates your sins, particularly your Tourette's-like swearing. ****-off |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
On 19/05/2012 11:13, M Wicks wrote:
On May 15, 8:26 pm, wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:24:21 -0700 (PDT), M wrote: On May 10, 7:14 am, wrote: On May 9, 9:40 pm, wrote: Saw part of the program on BBC2 tonight. The police were called to an accident on the A10 - at night - thought to be involving a cyclist. As the officer said - the A10 is an unlit dual carriage way with no street lights and fast traffic - it is not place for cyclists. I quite agree. What is frightening is hurtling up at night on a poorly lit cyclist with a speed differential of about 50 mph. there is a case for banning cyclists from fast moving dual carriageways as on motorways, all it needs is some moron 'taking the lane' to cause a crash with the resultant damage and delays to the vehicle concerned. Your prejudice against cyclists is nauseating, although no more so than a series of other unfortunate posters round here. Why do any of you bother? How does cycling really affect you in any negative way? i see the child has changed the headers again. If you are referring to Simon Mason, then I agree that he is not helping his case by doing this. However, one can understand why he has been driven to it when there are so many trolls on this newsgroup who are only here to post anti-cycling rhetoric. He does only do it when a troll starts a thread. Other than that, he tolerates disagreement better than most. Could you define what you mean by troll please? You. You are a troll, and you know it. For some reason you seem to derive a worrying amount of pleasure from it. Is annoying cyclists you don't even know /really/ the best possible use of your time that you can find? I will pray for you at church tomorrow. I would imagine that you have suffered great trauma in the past which you are now repressing and taking out on cyclists for some reason. It needs to stop, Judith, for both your sake and others'. If you find God then it will make you strong enough to beat this. I hope that you do. It is never too late to repent. God loves you, but he hates your sins, particularly your Tourette's-like swearing. **** me. Watch out for the thunderbolts Judith! A cyclists and a god botherer. Some people just don't have any luck in life. -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Traffic Cops
On 19/05/2012 12:22, Tris wrote:
In post M wrote: On May 15, 8:26 pm, wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:24:21 -0700 (PDT), M wrote: On May 10, 7:14 am, wrote: On May 9, 9:40 pm, wrote: Saw part of the program on BBC2 tonight. The police were called to an accident on the A10 - at night - thought to be involving a cyclist. As the officer said - the A10 is an unlit dual carriage way with no street lights and fast traffic - it is not place for cyclists. I quite agree. What is frightening is hurtling up at night on a poorly lit cyclist with a speed differential of about 50 mph. there is a case for banning cyclists from fast moving dual carriageways as on motorways, all it needs is some moron 'taking the lane' to cause a crash with the resultant damage and delays to the vehicle concerned. Your prejudice against cyclists is nauseating, although no more so than a series of other unfortunate posters round here. Why do any of you bother? How does cycling really affect you in any negative way? i see the child has changed the headers again. If you are referring to Simon Mason, then I agree that he is not helping his case by doing this. However, one can understand why he has been driven to it when there are so many trolls on this newsgroup who are only here to post anti-cycling rhetoric. He does only do it when a troll starts a thread. Other than that, he tolerates disagreement better than most. Could you define what you mean by troll please? You. You are a troll, and you know it. For some reason you seem to derive a worrying amount of pleasure from it. Is annoying cyclists you don't even know /really/ the best possible use of your time that you can find? I will pray for you at church tomorrow. I would imagine that you have suffered great trauma in the past which you are now repressing and taking out on cyclists for some reason. It needs to stop, Judith, for both your sake and others'. If you find God then it will make you strong enough to beat this. I hope that you do. It is never too late to repent. God loves you, but he hates your sins, particularly your Tourette's-like swearing. According to Google a usenet troll is "someone who posts inflammatory or off-topic messages". In which case most of us who post on usenet have thus been guilty of being a troll, at least, on occasions. So Mason & Cwispin are trolls then? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Traffic Cops | Wahaay | UK | 1 | May 30th 07 09:15 PM |
Trying to outrun the cops | Tom Crispin | UK | 6 | October 8th 06 04:57 PM |
Traffic Citations & Traffic Cops | Freddie | Mountain Biking | 0 | March 23rd 06 06:02 AM |
DEAD COPS | PEEONCPDDELATORRE | Australia | 0 | September 6th 05 02:49 PM |
Bike Cops in WA | SteveA | Australia | 11 | December 17th 04 11:42 AM |