I did my bit to stop these idiots despite Judith's complaints

On 26/06/2020 20:37, JNugent wrote:

Simon... do you REALLY think that anyone believes you have me killfiled?
;-)

You have now been prompted to reply - twice in very quick succession -

The threading shows you are wrong.

to my accurate observation that this "Cawkwell" character is a fully
qualified cyclist but is *not* - and cannot be described as - a "driver".

For goodness' sake put a sock in it.

On Sunday, June 28, 2020 at 11:45:18 AM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:

Six points on his driving licence?
The scum will be driving again in 18 months.
ENDS

I was the first to mention the 2018 six points on Cawkell's licence.

Why don't you read Nugent's messages?

Because he is in my killfile along with "Mr Cheerful".

On 12:22 28 Jun 2020, TMS320 said:
On 26/06/2020 20:37, JNugent wrote:


Simon... do you REALLY think that anyone believes you have me
killfiled? ;-)

You have now been prompted to reply - twice in very quick succession -

The threading shows you are wrong.

to my accurate observation that this "Cawkwell" character is a fully
qualified cyclist but is *not* - and cannot be described as - a
"driver".

For goodness' sake put a sock in it.

Are you Simon's sock? Just asking.

On 28/06/2020 13:59, Pamela wrote:
On 12:22 28 Jun 2020, TMS320 said:
On 26/06/2020 20:37, JNugent wrote:

Simon... do you REALLY think that anyone believes you have me
killfiled? ;-)

You have now been prompted to reply - twice in very quick succession -

The threading shows you are wrong.

to my accurate observation that this "Cawkwell" character is a fully
qualified cyclist but is *not* - and cannot be described as - a
"driver".

For goodness' sake put a sock in it.

Are you Simon's sock? Just asking...

....to make doubly sure that this post gets past Simon's filter.

On 28/06/2020 11:44, Pamela wrote:
On 19:56 27 Jun 2020, Simon Mason said:

On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 7:19:44 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 13:28 27 Jun 2020, Simon Mason said:

On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 12:51:41 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 18:08 26 Jun 2020, Simon Mason said:

On Friday, June 26, 2020 at 5:28:43 PM UTC+1, Simon Mason wrote:

Hull Crown Court heard Cawkwell had a previous conviction from
June 2018 for driving a car without insurance or a licence, for
which he was given six points for.

Six points on his driving licence?
The scum will be driving again in 18 months.

Nugent just mentioned six points. Why didn't you reply to his
message so we can see the thread properly?

Because he has been in my killfile for 10 years and I can't read his
tedious tripe, fortunately.

You must have seen Nugent's message because you replied to its point in
a different part of the thread.

I can't have replied to his message as his text appears blank to me and
I can't even read it.

The six points on Cawkwell's licence mention first appears in this post
of mine.

QUOTE:
On Friday, June 26, 2020 at 5:28:43 PM UTC+1, Simon Mason wrote:

Hull Crown Court heard Cawkwell had a previous conviction from June
2018 for driving a car without insurance or a licence, for which he was
given six points for.

Six points on his driving licence?
The scum will be driving again in 18 months.
ENDS

I was the first to mention the 2018 six points on Cawkell's licence.

Why don't you read Nugent's messages?

He did. And he was stung into replying to them whilst pretending not to.

On 28/06/2020 12:22, TMS320 wrote:

On 26/06/2020 20:37, JNugent wrote:

Simon... do you REALLY think that anyone believes you have me
killfiled? ;-)

You have now been prompted to reply - twice in very quick succession -

The threading shows you are wrong.

You are naive.
to my accurate observation that this "Cawkwell" character is a fully
qualified cyclist but is *not* - and cannot be described as - a "driver".

For goodness' sake put a sock in it.

Which bit of my observation on that person was incorrect or untruthful?

No matter how bad his behaviour or lack of competence for driving or
riding a motor vehicle, he is fully qualified for pedalling a bike -
isn't he?

A straightforward "Yes" or "No" is all that is required as a response
(with an attempt at explanation if you try it on by answering "No").

On Sunday, June 28, 2020 at 2:39:13 PM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:

Are you Simon's sock? Just asking...

...to make doubly sure that this post gets past Simon's filter.

Which Simon?
There are at least two.

On 28/06/2020 15:26, JNugent wrote:
On 28/06/2020 12:22, TMS320 wrote:
On 26/06/2020 20:37, JNugent wrote:

Simon... do you REALLY think that anyone believes you have me
killfiled? ;-)

You have now been prompted to reply - twice in very quick succession -

The threading shows you are wrong.

You are naive.

I know you have a very overrated sense of self-importance.

to my accurate observation that this "Cawkwell" character is a fully
qualified cyclist but is *not* - and cannot be described as - a
"driver".

For goodness' sake put a sock in it.

Which bit of my observation on that person was incorrect or untruthful?

Neither. Just a nonsense "obvervation". You're obviously very pleased
with yourself for thinking it up, given the number of times you have
used it.

On 28/06/2020 17:10, Simon Mason wrote:
On Sunday, June 28, 2020 at 2:39:13 PM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:

Are you Simon's sock? Just asking...

...to make doubly sure that this post gets past Simon's filter.

Which Simon?

I believe you're the one that has a "killfile" that the trolls seem to
bother about.

There are at least two.

Neither of you think that driver = good, cyclist = bad, so it doesn't
really matter.

On 29/06/2020 08:19, TMS320 wrote:

On 28/06/2020 15:26, JNugent wrote:
On 28/06/2020 12:22, TMS320 wrote:
On 26/06/2020 20:37, JNugent wrote:

Simon... do you REALLY think that anyone believes you have me
killfiled? ;-)

You have now been prompted to reply - twice in very quick succession -

The threading shows you are wrong.

You are naive.

I know you have a very overrated sense of self-importance.

Did Simon ever manage to sell that special "killfile" he has for use
with Google Groups? Surely the world is waiting for it? Even Google
would surely pay a pretty penny for the rights to it?

to my accurate observation that this "Cawkwell" character is a fully
qualified cyclist but is *not* - and cannot be described as - a
"driver".

For goodness' sake put a sock in it.

Which bit of my observation on that person was incorrect or untruthful?

Neither.

Thank you.

It was, in other words, 100% accurate.

Just a nonsense "obvervation".

Ah... a new definition... "Nonsense" - something which is 100% true but
which TMS320 doesn't like.

Thank you again. That you have said it is informative, about you.

You're obviously very pleased
with yourself for thinking it up, given the number of times you have
used it.

It's a straightforward truth. And I will remind you of it whenever one
of the usual suspects tries blames a (non-qualified and therefiore
non-existent) driver for the actions of a fully-qualified cyclist in
mishandling a vehicle he/she is not qualified to drive or ride. Where
the person in charge of the vehicle *is* a driver, it won't apply or be
applied.

Could one say fairer than that?