Why are revlimiters uneven?

On Sat, 22 May 2021 14:41:27 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when
they're broken.
After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye
on them all the time."

Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."

Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."

MID:

On Sat, 22 May 2021 16:19:29 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay little
masochist, blabbered again:


Peeler's diet includes marine invertebrates and dead or crippled fishes.

Yeah, very "impressive" ...your idiocy that is, you dumb gay little cyclist!
LOL

Sometimes, to the detriment of fishermen, Peeler attacks fish caught on
lines or in nets, boring his way into the bodies and eating the fish
from the inside.

LOL!!!

On 21/05/2021 19:23, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2021 06:10:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 20/05/2021 19:21, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2021 15:58:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 19/05/2021 19:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 19:26:55 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 11/05/2021 18:52, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:06:10 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 06/05/2021 18:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I did not have a rev limiter on my Renault Espace built in
1993.Â* I
broke the engine badly.

That shows what a stupid **** you are then

Why would anyone expect a car from 1993 not to have a limiter?

Because they were a stupid ****?

How am I stupid for expecting better engineering?Â* What year was
the rev
limiter invented?

I think about 1760

So what?

So why the **** did Renault not include it in their car of a much later
vintage?

They didn't include flint tools or a leather saddle either.

Do you think that was a serious omission?

The rev limiter, yes.Â* You make one mistake once in the life of the car
and you lose the engine.

I guess then that citroen should have added flotation devices and a
rudder to the chap I knew who drove into a flood and destroyed his engine

If you want foolproof transport dont sit behind the steering wheel. Get
someone else to do it


--
"Corbyn talks about equality, justice, opportunity, health care, peace,
community, compassion, investment, security, housing...."
"What kind of person is not interested in those things?"

"Jeremy Corbyn?"

On Sat, 22 May 2021 15:14:23 +0100, The Natural Idiot, the notorious,
troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered yet again:


I guess then that citroen should have added flotation devices and a
rudder to the chap I knew who drove into a flood and destroyed his engine

If you want foolproof transport dont sit behind the steering wheel. Get
someone else to do it

If you want the troll to come back for alwaysmore, just keep feeding him in
your idiotic senile manner, you NATURAL IDIOT! BG

On 05/22/2021 08:14 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


If you want foolproof transport dont sit behind the steering wheel. Get
someone else to do it

The two roll-over wrecks I've been in had someone else behind the wheel,
so no thanks.

On Sat, 22 May 2021 10:43:17 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


If you want foolproof transport dont sit behind the steering wheel. Get
someone else to do it

The two roll-over wrecks I've been in had someone else behind the wheel,
so no thanks.

Let me guess, you were talking to the poor driver all the time, senile
gossip! LMAO

On 22/05/2021 17:43, rbowman wrote:
On 05/22/2021 08:14 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


If you want foolproof transport dont sit behind the steering wheel. Get
someone else to do it

The two roll-over wrecks I've been in had someone else behind the wheel,
so no thanks.

But I wasn't talking to you
I was talking to Stupid****â„¢.
Anyone is safer behind the wheel than he is.

--
In todays liberal progressive conflict-free education system, everyone
gets full Marx.

On Sat, 22 May 2021 05:41:27 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 20 May 2021 21:22:39 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 20 May 2021 15:58:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 19/05/2021 19:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 19:26:55 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 11/05/2021 18:52, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:06:10 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 06/05/2021 18:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I did not have a rev limiter on my Renault Espace built in 1993.
I
broke the engine badly.

That shows what a stupid **** you are then

Why would anyone expect a car from 1993 not to have a limiter?

Because they were a stupid ****?

How am I stupid for expecting better engineering? What year was the
rev
limiter invented?

I think about 1760

So what?

So why the **** did Renault not include it in their car of a much later
vintage?

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

I noticed, but they tend to be a fraction of the price,

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

which is why I've had 4 of them. £500 for a car with only 45K on the
clock?

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

Unheard of for anything decent.

Only the stupid keep buying such ****ed cars.

It probably saves me money (on the purchase cost).

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 22 May 2021 05:41:27 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 20 May 2021 21:22:39 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 20 May 2021 15:58:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 19/05/2021 19:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 19:26:55 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 11/05/2021 18:52, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:06:10 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 06/05/2021 18:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I did not have a rev limiter on my Renault Espace built in 1993.
I
broke the engine badly.

That shows what a stupid **** you are then

Why would anyone expect a car from 1993 not to have a limiter?

Because they were a stupid ****?

How am I stupid for expecting better engineering? What year was the
rev
limiter invented?

I think about 1760

So what?

So why the **** did Renault not include it in their car of a much
later
vintage?

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

I noticed, but they tend to be a fraction of the price,

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

which is why I've had 4 of them. £500 for a car with only 45K on the
clock?

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

Unheard of for anything decent.

Only the stupid keep buying such ****ed cars.

It probably saves me money (on the purchase cost).

Bull**** it does when they last such a short time.

On Mon, 24 May 2021 07:58:43 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID: