Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days before Christmasgets jail sentence

On 08/09/2020 23:37, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:


You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

You made a mistake by wrongly assuming...

You assume that "not made a mistake" does not mean what it says.

On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 00:14:07 UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Nugents made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong because he's gone quiet about it.

On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?

On 09/09/2020 01:03, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 00:14:07 UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Nugents made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong because he's gone quiet about it.

Gibberish from Collins.

Yet again.

On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?

So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?

On 09/09/2020 02:53, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?

So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?

How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be?

Surely you can't have much further to go?

Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its
presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read?

On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 15:09:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 02:53, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read..
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?

So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?

How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be?

Surely you can't have much further to go?

Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its
presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read?

Yes

On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 16:43:21 UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 15:09:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 02:53, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?

So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?

How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be?

Surely you can't have much further to go?

Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its
presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read?

Yes

Using Nugent Logic, Nugent's failure to respond in a timely fashion proves I am right.

On 09/09/2020 16:43, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 15:09:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 02:53, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentÂ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?

So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?

How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be?

Surely you can't have much further to go?

Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its
presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read?

Yes

sigh

Please cite the Regulation.