|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
Tom Keats wrote:
In article , Tom Sherman writes: What's wrong with that? At least he's a normal male, what do you watch a male meteorologist with tight fitting pants? Remember, Tom rides a recumbent. I don't think that that makes him a normal male. Yeah, it is the upright male cyclists that display their posteriors ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hey, I'm not /always/ upright. Just when I'm in the mood. Or when I wake up in the morning. But you are upright when you ride, unless you have gone over to the "Dark Side" without telling us. covered in stretch fabric, while the recumbent rider sits modestly on a seat. A fairing provides even more modesty: One could slouch totally hidden within the coffin-like confines of a velomobile, too. OTOH, those things look a little too phallically ... compensating. Size does matter. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the precipitate. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Tom Keats wrote: In article , Tom Sherman writes: What's wrong with that? At least he's a normal male, what do you watch a male meteorologist with tight fitting pants? Remember, Tom rides a recumbent. I don't think that that makes him a normal male. Yeah, it is the upright male cyclists that display their posteriors Do not rile Saint Edward the Great! Human males in their physical aspects are all ugly baboons and never worth mentioning! Hey, I'm not /always/ upright. Just when I'm in the mood. Or when I wake up in the morning. But you are upright when you ride, unless you have gone over to the "Dark Side" without telling us. covered in stretch fabric, while the recumbent rider sits modestly on a seat. A fairing provides even more modesty: One could slouch totally hidden within the coffin-like confines of a velomobile, too. OTOH, those things look a little too phallically ... compensating. Size does matter. Second warning - do not rile Saint Edward the Great! This discussion of male attributes borders on being disgusting and revolting. The fact is that only rather young females have any physical attributes worth discussing. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
Edward Dolan wrote:
} } Size does matter. } } Second warning - do not rile Saint Edward the Great! This discussion } of male attributes borders on being disgusting and revolting. The } fact is that only rather young females have any physical attributes } worth discussing. } } Regards, } } Ed Dolan A recent study demonstrated that homophobes became more aroused from homoerotica than individuals who expoused tolerance or indifference. The more homophobic, the more aroused they became. In other words, stay in your log cabin or risk being compared to Larry Craig. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
On Nov 17, 11:23 am, Luddite Wacko wrote:
Edward Dolan wrote: } } Size does matter. } } Second warning - do not rile Saint Edward the Great! This discussion } of male attributes borders on being disgusting and revolting. The } fact is that only rather young females have any physical attributes } worth discussing. } } Regards, } } Ed Dolan A recent study demonstrated that homophobes became more aroused from homoerotica than individuals who expoused tolerance or indifference. The more homophobic, the more aroused they became. In other words, stay in your log cabin or risk being compared to Larry Craig. Shhhhh! Please don't out us. We keep our homoerotic fantasies repressed enough and then when they start manifesting themselves, we hide them. Why do you think that we like uprights and not recumbents? Unprights require that people wear these tight shorts while recumbents allow for people to wear regular shorts. Also, following a recumbent we see the back of a chair. Following upright cyclists in tights, we get to see their butts. All of us are a bunch of closeted queers, so, please, keep it down. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
Tom Sherman wrote: On a more serious note, following a high bottom bracket [2] recumbent is different in that one can not tell if the rider is pedaling or not. [...] [2] Or fully faired. It's easy to tell whether any kind of 'bent rider is pedaling or not. If he's wobbling back and forth rhythmically, barely in control of his machine, he's pedaling. If he's wobbling back and forth at random, barely in control of his machine, he's coasting. HTH, Chalo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
"Luddite Wacko" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: } } Size does matter. } } Second warning - do not rile Saint Edward the Great! This discussion } of male attributes borders on being disgusting and revolting. The } fact is that only rather young females have any physical attributes } worth discussing. } } Regards, } } Ed Dolan A recent study demonstrated that homophobes became more aroused from homoerotica than individuals who expoused tolerance or indifference. The more homophobic, the more aroused they became. In other words, stay in your log cabin or risk being compared to Larry Craig. Saint Edward the Great is only aroused by visions of the Saints. He is soon going to join that heavenly host Himself. I leave you to consort with your fellow male baboons and young comely maidens. In case you didn't know it, they are two seperate species of beings. I ask you, do monkeys mate with gorillas (or in your case, an orangutan)? Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
In rec.bicycles.misc Chalo wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote: On a more serious note, following a high bottom bracket [2] recumbent is different in that one can not tell if the rider is pedaling or not. [...] [2] Or fully faired. It's easy to tell whether any kind of 'bent rider is pedaling or not. If he's wobbling back and forth rhythmically, barely in control of his machine, he's pedaling. If he's wobbling back and forth at random, barely in control of his machine, he's coasting. Now now, that's not fair. Some of them have three wheels and hardly wobble at all. Which does have the advantage of doubling as a recliner chair to fall asleep in when one [1] is tired and tipsy and decides to fall asleep on your trike on your front lawn rather than get up and put everything away and stumble inside. [1] Not myself - a friend (even though he rides a recumbent ;-). -- Dane Buson - Power corrupts, but intermittent power corrupts absolutely. -- Jeff Bell, in the Scary Devil Monastery |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Upright versus laid back (was Bitter Irony...)
In article ,
Dane Buson wrote: In rec.bicycles.misc Chalo wrote: Tom Sherman wrote: On a more serious note, following a high bottom bracket [2] recumbent is different in that one can not tell if the rider is pedaling or not. [...] [2] Or fully faired. It's easy to tell whether any kind of 'bent rider is pedaling or not. If he's wobbling back and forth rhythmically, barely in control of his machine, he's pedaling. If he's wobbling back and forth at random, barely in control of his machine, he's coasting. Now now, that's not fair. Some of them have three wheels and hardly wobble at all. Which does have the advantage of doubling as a recliner chair to fall asleep in when one [1] is tired and tipsy and decides to fall asleep on your trike on your front lawn rather than get up and put everything away and stumble inside. Who used to watch Mystery Science Theater 3000 every week? Dr. Forrester: Say, what's the most popular form of exercise this month, hm? HMM? Well, that's right - the recumbent bike! As I see it, recumbent creators were afraid to make it *too* comfortable. Well, I'M not afraid! TADAH! [He reveals a bicycle basically equipped with a bed] Dr. Forrester: The ReComfy Bike! [Frank enters wearing pyjamas and a bike helmet] TV's Frank: Dr. F, could you tuck me in before my ride? Dr. Forrester: Of course, Franklin, there you go. Check out the reading lamp, nightstand and goose-down comforter. Of course, we might have to ditch the wheels and the pedals to make room for the ice machine and expresso bar, but... TV's Frank: Uh, Dr. F, I can't get it to go. Dr. Forrester: Well, try harder you LOAD! TV's Frank: Well, there's kind of a lot of stuff here. Dr. Forrester: [in whiny voice] Oh, there's kind of a lot of stuff here. Nappy time, don't you think, Frank? [forcefully tucks Frank in] Dr. Forrester: Back up to you, Margot. -- Michael Press |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bitter Irony... | Bill Sornson[_2_] | Techniques | 323 | January 20th 09 04:18 AM |
Bitter irony on 774AM | flyingdutch | Australia | 13 | September 1st 05 09:31 AM |
A (Laid back) piece of history | Jon Senior | UK | 5 | July 30th 05 08:29 AM |