Gee thanks Lance.

Lance and the gullible cock suckers that stood behind him despite his obvious
guilt might just have killed pro-cycling as an Olympic sport.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...ad-doping.html

"atriage" wrote in
message eb.com...

Lance and the gullible cock suckers that stood behind him despite his
obvious guilt might just have killed pro-cycling as an Olympic sport.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/lancearmstrong/9804830/Cycling-could-be-dropped-from-Olympics-if-Lance-Armstrong-reveals-governing-body-covered-up-widespread-doping.html


Thanks, that is still more proof that UCI/WADA was
content to have Armstrong be their fall guy for their
pathetic bureaucratic failure to do anything serious
to put a stop to the abuse of performance enhancing
drugs.

It was all a big charade. These bureaucracies were
and are all about their own growth and financial well-being
so they can employ more and more of their sycophants
and cronies. As long as they can pull their sanctimonious
wool over the public eye they are thrilled to do so.

This should be less about Armstrong and professional
cyclists in general and more about allowing self-serving
bureaucracies to run any business or sport in like
negligent and criminal manner as they run themselves
to the detriment of all and sundry.

--
Sir Gregory

On 16/01/2013 6:28 PM, atriage wrote:
Lance and the gullible cock suckers that stood behind him despite his
obvious guilt might just have killed pro-cycling as an Olympic sport.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...from-Olympics-

if-Lance-Armstrong-reveals-governing-body-covered-up-widespread-doping.html

Very unlikely IMO. Think about it. Why if it's "clean" now, would it be
dropped on the basis of past wrongs?

Or is it clean now. Talk amongst yourselves, children...?

--
Chris

'Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it
every six months.'

(Oscar Wilde.)

In article om,
atriage wrote:

Lance and the gullible cock suckers that stood behind him despite his obvious
guilt might just have killed pro-cycling as an Olympic sport.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...ad-doping.html

Wrong. It is olympic cycling that opened the
door to the drug testing that destroyed cycling.

--
Old Fritz

On 17/01/2013 21:33, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

Lance and the gullible cock suckers that stood behind him despite his obvious
guilt might just have killed pro-cycling as an Olympic sport.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...ad-doping.html

Wrong. It is olympic cycling that opened the
door to the drug testing that destroyed cycling.

Idiot

On 17/01/2013 10:03 PM, atriage wrote:
On 17/01/2013 21:33, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

Lance and the gullible cock suckers that stood behind him despite his
obvious
guilt might just have killed pro-cycling as an Olympic sport.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...from-Olympics-

if-Lance-Armstrong-reveals-governing-body-covered-up-widespread-doping.html


Wrong. It is olympic cycling that opened the
door to the drug testing that destroyed cycling.

Idiot
Or, indeed buffoon?

--
Chris

'Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it
every six months.'

(Oscar Wilde.)

On 18/01/2013 00:08, Mower Man wrote:
On 17/01/2013 10:03 PM, atriage wrote:
On 17/01/2013 21:33, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

Lance and the gullible cock suckers that stood behind him despite his
obvious
guilt might just have killed pro-cycling as an Olympic sport.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...from-Olympics-


if-Lance-Armstrong-reveals-governing-body-covered-up-widespread-doping.html


Wrong. It is olympic cycling that opened the
door to the drug testing that destroyed cycling.

Idiot
Or, indeed buffoon?

Buffoon it is although I doubt whether he actually believes the **** he posts,
rbr is the haunt of many trolls. The facebook version is probably more sensible
but I can't see beyond the twee interface and I hate facebook/****ter and all
the rest of the soshul meeja.

In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 17/01/2013 21:33, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

Lance and the gullible cock suckers that stood behind him despite his obvious
guilt might just have killed pro-cycling as an Olympic sport.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...ad-doping.html

Wrong. It is olympic cycling that opened the
door to the drug testing that destroyed cycling.

Idiot

Hang in there. You are doing great.

--
Old Fritz