|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
Hey doctor ****ing Allen, how are those Floyd wattage plausability
calculations going now? According to my limited brain capacity either you knew and you were complicit which makes you as big of an asshole as Floyd or you didn't and you're totally incompetent. Which is it? Your Twitter account got very very quiet today. Please Inform, -DA74 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
On 5/20/2010 11:31 PM, DA74 wrote:
Hey doctor ****ing Allen, how are those Floyd wattage plausability calculations going now? According to my limited brain capacity either you knew and you were complicit which makes you as big of an asshole as Floyd or you didn't and you're totally incompetent. Which is it? Your Twitter account got very very quiet today. Please Inform, -DA74 That French gym teacher's analysis is looking better all the time. :-) It will be interesting to see what the Feds do next. The US Attorney who brings Armstrong down will have a major career builder for hi/her resume. Note to Lance and Johann, testimony before a Grand Jury is under oath and it's not good form to lie. Landis says he's got much more to reveal. Photos of the blood in the fridge? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
On 5/21/2010 6:32 AM, B. Lafferty wrote:
On 5/20/2010 11:31 PM, DA74 wrote: Hey doctor ****ing Allen, how are those Floyd wattage plausability calculations going now? According to my limited brain capacity either you knew and you were complicit which makes you as big of an asshole as Floyd or you didn't and you're totally incompetent. Which is it? Your Twitter account got very very quiet today. Please Inform, -DA74 That French gym teacher's analysis is looking better all the time. :-) It will be interesting to see what the Feds do next. The US Attorney who brings Armstrong down will have a major career builder for hi/her resume. Note to Lance and Johann, testimony before a Grand Jury is under oath and it's not good form to lie. Landis says he's got much more to reveal. Photos of the blood in the fridge? ".....Landis, who spent nearly two years and reportedly more than $2 million fighting the charges against him, has agreed to cooperate with authorities in the United States and provide them with the same information he has provided anti-doping and cycling officials, according to two people briefed on the matter. The United States authorities are interested in whatever information Landis has about distributors of banned substances and new methods of doping being used by athletes. Over the past month, Landis also has been cooperating with officials from the United States Anti-Doping Agency, providing them with details about the other cyclists and Armstrong, the people briefed on the matter said. Jeff Novitzky, a federal agent who spearheaded the investigation into the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative steroids case, is involved in the investigation. It is not clear whether Landis has contacted him via e-mail or telephone......" http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/sp...gewanted=2&hpw |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
On Fri, 21 May 2010 06:37:41 -0400, "B. Lafferty"
wrote: On 5/21/2010 6:32 AM, B. Lafferty wrote: On 5/20/2010 11:31 PM, DA74 wrote: Hey doctor ****ing Allen, how are those Floyd wattage plausability calculations going now? According to my limited brain capacity either you knew and you were complicit which makes you as big of an asshole as Floyd or you didn't and you're totally incompetent. Which is it? Your Twitter account got very very quiet today. Please Inform, -DA74 That French gym teacher's analysis is looking better all the time. :-) It will be interesting to see what the Feds do next. The US Attorney who brings Armstrong down will have a major career builder for hi/her resume. Note to Lance and Johann, testimony before a Grand Jury is under oath and it's not good form to lie. Landis says he's got much more to reveal. Photos of the blood in the fridge? ".....Landis, who spent nearly two years and reportedly more than $2 million fighting the charges against him, has agreed to cooperate with authorities in the United States and provide them with the same information he has provided anti-doping and cycling officials, according to two people briefed on the matter. The United States authorities are interested in whatever information Landis has about distributors of banned substances and new methods of doping being used by athletes. Over the past month, Landis also has been cooperating with officials from the United States Anti-Doping Agency, providing them with details about the other cyclists and Armstrong, the people briefed on the matter said. Jeff Novitzky, a federal agent who spearheaded the investigation into the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative steroids case, is involved in the investigation. It is not clear whether Landis has contacted him via e-mail or telephone......" http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/sp...gewanted=2&hpw And yet you don't include this quote: "Landis also did not return phone calls, but told ESPN.com that he had no documentation to prove most of his claims against his former teammates. “I want to clear my conscience,” said Landis, who races with the lower level OUCH-Bahati Foundation Pro Cycling team. “I don’t want to be part of the problem anymore.” What was that again? "Landis also did not return phone calls, but told ESPN.com that he had no documentation to prove most of his claims against his former teammates." Floyd couldn't buy drugs now from a pusher on the street in Baltimore unless he went incognito. His only conduits are mail order from Canada and Mexico, so I'm guessing he has a pretty limited amount of information to tell an attorney in the U.S. about any 'new methods of doping'. I'll cover your bet on whether LA gets indicted on this (no), and double down on a conviction (no). Not rich, so I'll cover on $ 250 and $ 500, Lafferty. Anything more than mouth on this, BL? Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
On May 21, 5:32*am, "B. Lafferty" wrote:
On 5/20/2010 11:31 PM, DA74 wrote: Hey doctor ****ing Allen, how are those Floyd wattage plausability calculations going now? *According to my limited brain capacity either you knew and you were complicit which makes you as big of an asshole as Floyd or you didn't and you're totally incompetent. Which is it? Your Twitter account got very very quiet today. Please Inform, -DA74 That French gym teacher's analysis is looking better all the time. :-) It will be interesting to see what the Feds do next. *The US Attorney who brings Armstrong down will have a major career builder for hi/her resume. Note to Lance and Johann, testimony before a Grand Jury is under oath and it's not good form to lie. Landis says he's got much more to reveal. *Photos of the blood in the fridge? Glad to see you're still paying attention, Brian. Missed ya! When the smoke clears, a return to the halcyon days of yore when sport was honest and clean? --D-y --D-y |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
On Fri, 21 May 2010 07:46:58 -0400, "B. Lafferty"
wrote: To engage in the kind of scheme that Landis is alleging, there are too many people involved to keep the truth hidden forever. Once people are less dependent on Lance for their living and careers, and subject to federal investigators questioning and Grand Jury subpoenas, things tend to unravel. Which isn't the thrust of the Federal probe discussed. Unlike you, the feds aren't fixated on LA. Unless the details exist and are primarily about LA and about activities in the U.S. or have a U.S. nexus and are new enough that they haven't been covered previously in investigations in other jurisdictions and they justify the use and expenditure of funds, you will be disappointed once again. I have no issue that there is plenty of circumstantial evidence that LA used drugs to one extent or another. There is more than circumstantial evidence that his peers were also using drugs, so it isn't really an issue for me. The problem is that you seize on every possible shred of new innuendo and try to announce a federal case against LA in the near future. Very unlikely. The bet isn't that there isn't enough 'evidence' for you to go for an appreciable portion of the remainder of your life with this fixation on LA's drug use - pitiful as that may be - but that there will be a U.S. Federal indictment of Lance Armstrong and that he will be convicted of a criminal charge, however major or minor, from the evidence, details or connected evidence and details arising, however tenuous, from the Floyd boy details. And there were a lot of people involved in the shelling of the USS Liberty 43 years ago, more than all the people that have passed through LA's teams in his lifetime, and that still lies under a heavy cover of bull****. 'Once people''too many people' - what people? They can't just go out and do a fishing expedition on an old case on 'details' - most of those that will be called have done time under oath. Floyd will probably remain the only one going on record voluntarily as having lied under oath. You know, if I spent as much time as you creating a dream world, it would NOT have LA as the center... Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010 06:37:41 -0400, "B. Lafferty" wrote: On 5/21/2010 6:32 AM, B. Lafferty wrote: On 5/20/2010 11:31 PM, DA74 wrote: Hey doctor ****ing Allen, how are those Floyd wattage plausability calculations going now? According to my limited brain capacity either you knew and you were complicit which makes you as big of an asshole as Floyd or you didn't and you're totally incompetent. Which is it? Your Twitter account got very very quiet today. Please Inform, -DA74 That French gym teacher's analysis is looking better all the time. :-) It will be interesting to see what the Feds do next. The US Attorney who brings Armstrong down will have a major career builder for hi/her resume. Note to Lance and Johann, testimony before a Grand Jury is under oath and it's not good form to lie. Landis says he's got much more to reveal. Photos of the blood in the fridge? ".....Landis, who spent nearly two years and reportedly more than $2 million fighting the charges against him, has agreed to cooperate with authorities in the United States and provide them with the same information he has provided anti-doping and cycling officials, according to two people briefed on the matter. The United States authorities are interested in whatever information Landis has about distributors of banned substances and new methods of doping being used by athletes. Over the past month, Landis also has been cooperating with officials from the United States Anti-Doping Agency, providing them with details about the other cyclists and Armstrong, the people briefed on the matter said. Jeff Novitzky, a federal agent who spearheaded the investigation into the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative steroids case, is involved in the investigation. It is not clear whether Landis has contacted him via e-mail or telephone......" http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/sp...gewanted=2&hpw And yet you don't include this quote: "Landis also did not return phone calls, but told ESPN.com that he had no documentation to prove most of his claims against his former teammates. “I want to clear my conscience,” said Landis, who races with the lower level OUCH-Bahati Foundation Pro Cycling team. “I don’t want to be part of the problem anymore.” What was that again? "Landis also did not return phone calls, but told ESPN.com that he had no documentation to prove most of his claims against his former teammates." Floyd couldn't buy drugs now from a pusher on the street in Baltimore unless he went incognito. His only conduits are mail order from Canada and Mexico, so I'm guessing he has a pretty limited amount of information to tell an attorney in the U.S. about any 'new methods of doping'. I'll cover your bet on whether LA gets indicted on this (no), and double down on a conviction (no). Not rich, so I'll cover on $ 250 and $ 500, Lafferty. Anything more than mouth on this, BL? Lafferty's right. Landis has evidence for everything. Landis even has a signed confession by the shooter on the grassy knoll. I got your back on this one, Brian. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
On May 21, 7:46*am, "B. Lafferty" wrote:
When you look at the ever lengthing list of people who have implicated Armstrong in drug use (Andreau and wife, Irish former soigneur, Dutch masseur, the woman Oakley sales director, Landis plus the number of former teammates busted over the years), I think one can reasonably conclude that Armstrong has simply been the best at keeping the lid the Postal-Discovery story. dumbass, this may be true and in cycling the truth often comes out many years later, but there will not be any sporting or criminal sanctions. also, you still obsesses over armstrong. an implication on armstrong is nothing new. landis also implicated leipheimer, zabriskie, bruyneel, rihs and hincapie - riders/directors who have been relatively free of controversy. that to me is the bigger development. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, where's Allen Lim?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where to buy a 3.5mm allen key? | Dave Thompson | Techniques | 9 | May 11th 10 09:29 PM |
deformed allen keys | Maurice W | UK | 15 | April 23rd 07 08:55 PM |
Allen Lim 'splains | [email protected] | Racing | 1 | September 8th 06 04:03 AM |
Allen Lim quiet | Floyd Cheated | Racing | 0 | August 11th 06 06:37 AM |
Rumor that Allen Lim has walked.... | Froid Landis | Racing | 0 | August 8th 06 12:24 AM |