$2,000,000,000,000 nightmare

On Mar 5, 10:20 pm, Zoot Katz wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:48:30 GMT, Little Meow wrote:
Zoot Katz wrote in
:

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:54:14 -0800 (PST), Red Cloud
wrote:

On Mar 4, 11:22 am, wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/op...l?_r=1&ref=opi
...

Jobst Brandt

Ultimately, the money is going to corp which causes inflation.
Bush said that we need spend more money on war which created jobs
and increased production. Who are the losers? It's American citizens
who pay higher tax and their living standard go down by hyper-
inflation.

Congratulations on the marked improvement of your written
communications skills.

If that's really you, where's your cat?

It not him. The real Red Cloud would has realize the Bush nation
must be to guided by White Penis Power in the effort to dominate
a bike nation like the Iraq nation, where thr all lane are bike.

You used to write more clearly.

If you aren't Red Cloud', it sounds like you're on the same cloud.

Seen Eddie?
--
zk

you bloody ****ing bugger what the **** are you talking about?

On Mar 5, 8:32 pm, Zoot Katz wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:54:14 -0800 (PST), Red Cloud

wrote:
On Mar 4, 11:22 am, wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/op...l?_r=1&ref=opi...

Jobst Brandt

Ultimately, the money is going to corp which causes inflation.
Bush said that we need spend more money on war which created jobs
and increased production. Who are the losers? It's American citizens
who pay higher tax and their living standard go down by hyper-
inflation.

Congratulations on the marked improvement of your written
communications skills.

If that's really you, where's your cat?
--
zk


Is that your joke or stupidity or troll?

On Mar 5, 10:54*pm, Red Cloud wrote:

Ultimately, the money is going to corp which causes *inflation.
Bush said that we need spend more money on war which created jobs
and increased production. Who are the losers? It's American citizens
who pay higher tax and their living standard go down by hyper-
inflation.

but the war is not about economics- going to war will always worsen
the economic base as you are throwing the product out the window while
your infrastructure deteriorates- and the us is not some isolated
planet either- the bush admin when he 1st took office when he made it
clear he was going to focus on domestic issues and not get invovled in
foriegn diplomacy as the previous administration did, remember ?

On Mar 4, 1:22 pm, wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/op...l?_r=1&ref=opi...

Jobst Brandt

$2 TRL was stolen from our taxes and given away as "no bid" contracts
to companies then barely employ any Americans anymore - relying
instead
on foreign subcontractors.

Lets not forget that original COST ESTIMATE by Rumsfeld was $2 BLN
(yes BILLION!) and 3-4 months with no more than 100 KIAs.

It will be remembered as largest robbery ever committed by elected
officials in the history of the world.

And the worst part is that in the same time Bush talks about
"fiscal responsibility" and cuts funding (mere $4 BLN) to secure
our borders. That means that GOP slogans about their commitment to
fighting terrorist is just a fairytale of lunatic brain - no sane
person would waste trillions on useless war that only advances
the ability of Islamist radicals to recruit in fundraise and in
the same time cut funding for BASIC issues like border and port
security.

In article ,
TomP wrote:

Just so the rest of you know; the link below has a virus; avg virus scan
caught it in
time....

wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/op...ref=opinion&or
ef=slogin

Jobst Brandt

loundeye molon amelican dort.

--
This signature can be appended to your outgoing mesages. Many people include in
their signatures contact information, and perhaps a joke or quotation.

Just so the rest of you know; the link below has a virus;
avg virus scan caught it in time....

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/op...04herbert.html

=x= No, that is absolute rubbish. There is no virus there
or anywhere on the _New_York_Times_ website.
_Jym_