|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
You won't believe this!
Ted wrote:
In article , "Amanita, Love Ewe" wrote: [snipped] g.daniels may be interested in this, but I am not. G. Daniels actually makes sense (for the most part) when you adjust to his writing style. The original post in this thread was just computer generated gibberish. -- Tom Sherman |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Ted wrote: In article , "Amanita, Love Ewe" wrote: [snipped] g.daniels may be interested in this, but I am not. G. Daniels actually makes sense (for the most part) when you adjust to his writing style. The original post in this thread was just computer generated gibberish. -- Tom Sherman Hmm... Made perfect sense to me. Marty |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Ted wrote: In article , "Amanita, Love Ewe" wrote: [snipped] g.daniels may be interested in this, but I am not. G. Daniels actually makes sense (for the most part) when you adjust to his writing style. The original post in this thread was just computer generated gibberish. -- Tom Sherman Hmm... Made perfect sense to me. Marty |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I found it kind of amusing in the absolute incomprensibility of it -- keydates |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I found it kind of amusing in the absolute incomprensibility of it -- keydates |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
keydates wrote:
I found it kind of amusing in the absolute incomprensibility of it. For the love of God man WHY CAN'T YOU QUOTE ANYTHING?!? Bill " "" " S. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
keydates wrote:
I found it kind of amusing in the absolute incomprensibility of it. For the love of God man WHY CAN'T YOU QUOTE ANYTHING?!? Bill " "" " S. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|