|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
$14.95 for a 13-24 7-speed freewheel (sunrace) at bikeman.com
$12.95 for a 13-24 7-speed freewheel (nashbar) at nashbar.com I remember that when IRD first announced their 'defiant' freewheels, they were touted as being high quality, worthy of going onto phil wood freewheel hubs (which were supposedly 1/3rd the cost of a phil wood cassette hub.) They were supposed to be exact copies of Shimano Dura-Ace freewheels, but in reality, they simply aren't. Now, I am seeing 13-24 7-speed freewheels that are 1/3rd the cost of an IRD freewheel, at $40. Are we really going to get 3x the service life on the IRD 2nd generation freewheels? If we're supposed to use IRD freewheels to save 2/3rds the cost of a Phil Wood hub, why not use these freewheels to save 2/3rds the cost of an IRD Freewheel ?? Especially, if the IRD bodies cannot be opened or easily oiled ?? Has anyone tried to move IRD 2nd-generation cogs over to a dura ace freewheel body? Do they fit ?? Thanx, - Don Gillies San Diego, CA, USA P.S. http://www.bikemannetwork.com/biking/p/FW2129 sunrace @ bikeman http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?sku=11696 nashbar @ nashbar |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
"Donald Gillies" wrote in message
... | $14.95 for a 13-24 7-speed freewheel (sunrace) at bikeman.com | $12.95 for a 13-24 7-speed freewheel (nashbar) at nashbar.com | | I remember that when IRD first announced their 'defiant' | freewheels, they were touted as being high quality, worthy | of going onto phil wood freewheel hubs (which were supposedly | 1/3rd the cost of a phil wood cassette hub.) They were supposed to be | exact copies of Shimano Dura-Ace freewheels, but in reality, they | simply aren't. | | Now, I am seeing 13-24 7-speed freewheels that are 1/3rd the cost of | an IRD freewheel, at $40. Are we really going to get 3x the service | life on the IRD 2nd generation freewheels? If we're supposed to use | IRD freewheels to save 2/3rds the cost of a Phil Wood hub, why not use | these freewheels to save 2/3rds the cost of an IRD Freewheel ?? | | Especially, if the IRD bodies cannot be opened or easily oiled ?? Has | anyone tried to move IRD 2nd-generation cogs over to a dura ace | freewheel body? Do they fit ?? | | Thanx, | | - Don Gillies | San Diego, CA, USA | | P.S. | | http://www.bikemannetwork.com/biking/p/FW2129 sunrace @ bikeman | | http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?sku=11696 nashbar @ nashbar Don: Your posts are usually pretty easy to follow, but this one isn't coming through. I don't understand the references to Phil Wood hubs and how that relates to IRD. How does using an IRD freewheel save 2/3rds the cost of a Phil Wood hub? Etc. In any event, my personal experience with IRD cassettes & freewheels is that they usually offer something not found elsewhere, but they're not ultimate quality by any stretch of the imagination. They get credit, in other words, for allowing 10-speed folk to have wide-range gearing (up to 34t rear cassette size, instead of the 27 Shimano or 28 SRAM offers), but, for their price, the quality isn't what one would expect. Very heavy, and don't shift as nicely as a Shimano (and yet cost quite a bit more). But again, they're providing a service that nobody else is. I do like the description given for the freewheel though, from the IRD website- http://www.interlocracing.com/freewheels_steel.html Index shifting waves and special teeth profiles (looks just like the teeth on the SunRace) Nickel plated cogs (ditto above) Heat-treated for durability (non-heat-treated cogs would be very unusual and wear like butter; my guess is that SunRace cogs are also heat-treated) Polycarbonate glass fiber spacers (OK, that might be normal or not, I honestly don't know, but also don't recall a failure of a freewheel spacer) Double row precision bearings (Hopefully I've *never* sold a freewheel with just one row of bearings. Don't think I've seen one either) Double pawl mechanism w/ 20 interface ratchets (Double pawls are the norm; don't know how many ratchets are commonly used) Labyrinth seals (which simply means overlapping metal; you can't visibly look into it and see bearings) --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
On Apr 11, 7:51*pm, (Donald Gillies) wrote:
$14.95 for a 13-24 7-speed freewheel (sunrace) at bikeman.com $12.95 for a 13-24 7-speed freewheel (nashbar) atnashbar.com Buy one of each and give us a report back in six months. Sunrace is certainly capable of making a quality product, and Nashbar is known for re-branding quite decent Taiwanese stuff. That said, there have been some reports in this group about the Nashbar cassettes not lasting as long--but who knows where they came from. Buy a couple, let us know--it'll be more rewarding than playing the lottery. Taiwanese lesser known manufacturers are putting out some quality kit. We just discussed this a while back in relation to Nashbar square taper BBs, made by RPM, and ridiculously smooth and cheap. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
On Apr 12, 12:51*am, "Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote:
"Donald Gillies" wrote in message ... | $14.95 for a 13-24 7-speed freewheel (sunrace) at bikeman.com | $12.95 for a 13-24 7-speed freewheel (nashbar) at nashbar.com | | I remember that when IRD first announced their 'defiant' | freewheels, they were touted as being high quality, worthy | of going onto phil wood freewheel hubs (which were supposedly | 1/3rd the cost of a phil wood cassette hub.) *They were supposed to be | exact copies of Shimano Dura-Ace freewheels, but in reality, they | simply aren't. | | Now, I am seeing 13-24 7-speed freewheels that are 1/3rd the cost of | an IRD freewheel, at $40. *Are we really going to get 3x the service | life on the IRD 2nd generation freewheels? *If we're supposed to use | IRD freewheels to save 2/3rds the cost of a Phil Wood hub, why not use | these freewheels to save 2/3rds the cost of an IRD Freewheel ?? | | Especially, if the IRD bodies cannot be opened or easily oiled ?? *Has | anyone tried to move IRD 2nd-generation cogs over to a dura ace | freewheel body? *Do they fit ?? | | Thanx, | | - Don Gillies | San Diego, CA, USA | | P.S. | | *http://www.bikemannetwork.com/biking/p/FW2129* *sunrace @ bikeman | | *http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?sku=11696* * nashbar @ nashbar Don: Your posts are usually pretty easy to follow, but this one isn't coming through. I don't understand the references to Phil Wood hubs and how that relates to IRD. How does using an IRD freewheel save 2/3rds the cost of a Phil Wood hub? Etc. http://www.philwood.com/Specroadhubs.htm Phil freewheel hub $151. Phil cassette hub $384. 39%. Freewheel hubs available for 5,6,7,8 speed freewheels. If you were going to use a 7 or 8 speed cassette, maybe comparable. In any event, my personal experience with IRD cassettes & freewheels is that they usually offer something not found elsewhere, but they're not ultimate quality by any stretch of the imagination. They get credit, in other words, for allowing 10-speed folk to have wide-range gearing (up to 34t rear cassette size, instead of the 27 Shimano or 28 SRAM offers), but, for their price, the quality isn't what one would expect. Very heavy, and don't shift as nicely as a Shimano (and yet cost quite a bit more). But again, they're providing a service that nobody else is. I do like the description given for the freewheel though, from the IRD website-http://www.interlocracing.com/freewheels_steel.html Index shifting waves and special teeth profiles *(looks just like the teeth on the SunRace) Nickel plated cogs *(ditto above) Heat-treated for durability *(non-heat-treated cogs would be very unusual and wear like butter; my guess is that SunRace cogs are also heat-treated) Polycarbonate glass fiber spacers *(OK, that might be normal or not, I honestly don't know, but also don't recall a failure of a freewheel spacer) Pretty sure all Campagnolo 9 speed cassette spacers are polycarbonate. Reddish yellowish colored when new. Some of the 10 speed spacers are also poly. I've broken more than a few spacers. Fortunately new cassettes come with new spacers. And even broken spacers work if you have enough of the pieces. Double row precision bearings *(Hopefully I've *never* sold a freewheel with just one row of bearings. Don't think I've seen one either) Double pawl mechanism w/ 20 interface ratchets *(Double pawls are the norm; don't know how many ratchets are commonly used) Labyrinth seals *(which simply means overlapping metal; you can't visibly look into it and see bearings) --Mike-- * * Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
wrote:
Phil freewheel hub $151. Phil cassette hub $384. 39%. Freewheel hubs available for 5,6,7,8 speed freewheels. If you were going to use a 7 or 8 speed cassette, maybe comparable. If you were going to run a 9 or 10-speed cassette, it's still comparable. So far, there has been no expansion of gearing range offered by higher sprocket counts. In fact, the widest gearing offered for 9-speed is 11-34 (309%), whereas the widest gearing offered by 7-speed freewheels was 12-38 (317%). 10-speed gearing doesn't offer anything even close. A freewheel hub like the Phil gives better dish than 8/9/10-speed cassette (for any given dropout spacing), a larger and stronger axle, and a more robust ratcheting mechanism that is cheaper and easier to replace. I recently killed my only cassette hub (a tandem-spec 48 hole unit) while climbing a small hill near my house. That's never happened to me with a freewheel. Chalo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
Chalo writes:
If you were going to run a 9 or 10-speed cassette, it's still comparable. So far, there has been no expansion of gearing range offered by higher sprocket counts. In fact, the widest gearing offered for 9-speed is 11-34 (309%), whereas the widest gearing offered by 7-speed freewheels was 12-38 (317%). 10-speed gearing doesn't offer anything even close. insightful comment, thanx !! Also, it's been evident for a long time that more and more gears in the rear accomplishes only two things, (a) Faster chain wearout (cogs haven't been getting thinner), and (b) More and more shifts necessary up front !! a 53-12 is very seldom a useful gear for the man-on-the-street. A typical 39-25 isn't an improvement over the old days, either (when 42/28 gave an even lower gear !!) A freewheel hub like the Phil gives better dish than 8/9/10-speed cassette (for any given dropout spacing), agreed. a larger and stronger axle, How can this be true? The right-side bearing of a freewheel hub is unsupported - its 30-35mm in from the dropouts, making it far more vulnerable to pedaling torques. I am not aware of anyone breaking 9-speed or 10-speed freehub axles ... anyone? Anyone???? and a more robust ratcheting mechanism that is cheaper and easier to replace. I recently killed my only cassette hub (a tandem-spec 48 hole unit) while climbing a small hill near my house. That's never happened to me with a freewheel. I am not sure this is true. There existed in the past 4-pawl freewheels specifically for tandem application, indicating that 2-pawl freewheels were failure-prone on tandems. And, I understood from Sheldon Brown's website, concerning upgrade from uniglide to hyperglide freehubs, that Shimano freehub ratchet mechanisms are widely available?? So ratchet mechanism replacements are simple? Is that a falsehood ?? Chalo - Don Gillies San Diego, CA, USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
Donald Gillies wrote:
Chalo writes: [Phil freewheel hubs offer] a larger and stronger axle, How can this be true? The right-side bearing of a freewheel hub is unsupported - its 30-35mm in from the dropouts, making it far more vulnerable to pedaling torques. I am not aware of anyone breaking 9-speed or 10-speed freehub axles ... anyone? Anyone???? The Shimano cassette freehub design is limited to a 10mm threaded axle. There are other variations, but at the expense of strength in the ratchet-- and they top out at 12mm. I have broken 10mm cassette hub axles (7-speed). I have also broken 9.5 and 10mm freewheel hub axles, but I have never broken a larger diameter unthreaded hub axle. Phil freewheel hubs use a 15mm smooth axle. Up to 19mm is hypothetically feasible, since a Shimano-type freewheel spline allows that diameter. Even accounting for drive side overhang, a 15mm smooth axle outclasses a 10mm threaded axle. and a more robust ratcheting mechanism that is cheaper and easier to replace. I am not sure this is true. There existed in the past 4-pawl freewheels specifically for tandem application, indicating that 2-pawl freewheels were failure-prone on tandems. I can only speak from my experience with equipment I have used and serviced. I have messed up cassettes and gearhubs, but not freewheels (despite most of my miles being on freewheel-equipped bikes). The multispeed freewheels I've used include various Suntour, Shimano, Sachs-Maillard, SunRace, and Falcon models in 5, 6, and 7-speed versions. It stands to reason that cassette ratchets would not be as hardy as their freewheel equivalents-- not only is the torque applied through a smaller radius, but the structure holding back the expansion of the pawls is much less rigid. Compare the outer shell of a freehub body to the outer shell of any freewheel body. From what I have seen, the pawls themselves are more or less equivalent between the two types. And, I understood from Sheldon Brown's website, concerning upgrade from uniglide to hyperglide freehubs, that Shimano freehub ratchet mechanisms are widely available?? So ratchet mechanism replacements are simple? Is that a falsehood ?? To replace the ratchet mechanism of a freewheel hub, you simply replace the freewheel. You unscrew it with a spline tool and mount a new one. This operation costs at least $10 for a new freewheel. Usually I pay $20 for a new 11-34 7-speed freewheel. In the process, I get all new freewheel bearings and sprockets along with a new ratchet. For a cassette freehub, you have to remove the cassette lockring (a slightly fussier operation involving a chain whip and a different spline tool) and the cassette sprockets, then remove the hub axle and bearings, then use a 10mm hex key or a special spline tool to remove the freehub body. Replace the freehub body; clean, regrease, and adjust the axle bearings; and replace the sprockets and lockring. It looks like the parts cost of this operation starts at approximately $20 for a freehub body. The new freehub body comes with new bearings and pawls, but the sprockets must be replaced separately at much greater cost. Chalo |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
On Apr 13, 10:20*pm, (Donald Gillies) wrote:
Chalo writes: If you were going to run a 9 or 10-speed cassette, it's still comparable. *So far, there has been no expansion of gearing range offered by higher sprocket counts. Is gearing range a problem? Is there a need to expand it? How much lower of a low do you need than a 34 rear cog? 34 is available in 7-8-9-10 cassettes and/or freewheels. How much higher of a high do you need than an 11 or 12 cog? This is readily available if you want it. Its apparent you are arguing for a wider gear range just because it can be done even though it has no purpose. And you condemn 9-10 speed cassettes for not doing something pointless. Bizarre. *In fact, the widest gearing offered for 9-speed is 11-34 (309%), whereas the widest gearing offered by 7-speed freewheels was 12-38 (317%). *10-speed gearing doesn't offer anything even close. IRD makes a 10 speed cassette in 11-34(Shimano) and 11-32(Campagnolo). Seems pretty close to 11-34 9 speed. As for your 12-38 7 speed freewheel, who sells that today? Please give a source. 300+% range on the cluster. Not unless its for a special purpose bike. Sounds like the marketing for the Rohloff hub. 500+% gear range. Only problem is the huge jumps between gears to achieve that. Maybe good for special purpose bikes. But not for ordinary enjoyable riding. insightful comment, thanx !! *Also, it's been evident for a long time that more and more gears in the rear accomplishes only two things, (a) Faster chain wearout (cogs haven't been getting thinner), and (b) More and more shifts necessary up front !! *a 53-12 is very seldom a useful gear for the man-on-the-street. *A typical 39-25 isn't an improvement over the old days, either (when 42/28 gave an even lower gear !!) Why don't you just use a 42 chainring? You claim to know a lot about bicycles, yet you assume 39 is the only chainring. Odd. If I want I can go an entire day in the 42 ring without shifting the front at all. And I use cassettes with 13 tooth small cogs on most of my bikes. They are widely available from Shimano and Campagnolo. You assume incorrectly that 12 (or 11) is the only thing available when using a 53 ring. Odd. A freewheel hub like the Phil gives better dish than 8/9/10-speed cassette (for any given dropout spacing), agreed. a larger and stronger axle, How can this be true? *The right-side bearing of a freewheel hub is unsupported - its 30-35mm in from the dropouts, making it far more vulnerable to pedaling torques. *I am not aware of anyone breaking 9-speed or 10-speed freehub axles ... anyone? *Anyone???? and a more robust ratcheting mechanism that is cheaper and easier to replace. *I recently killed my only cassette hub (a tandem-spec 48 hole unit) while climbing a small hill near my house. *That's never happened to me with a freewheel. I am not sure this is true. *There existed in the past 4-pawl freewheels specifically for tandem application, indicating that 2-pawl freewheels were failure-prone on tandems. *And, I understood from Sheldon Brown's website, concerning upgrade from uniglide to hyperglide freehubs, that Shimano freehub ratchet mechanisms are widely available?? *So ratchet mechanism replacements are simple? *Is that a falsehood ?? Chalo - Don Gillies San Diego, CA, USA |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
russellseaton1 wrote:
Donald Gillies wrote: Chalo writes: If you were going to run a 9 or 10-speed cassette, it's still comparable. So far, there has been no expansion of gearing range offered by higher sprocket counts. Is gearing range a problem? Is there a need to expand it? How much lower of a low do you need than a 34 rear cog? That, like everything, depends on the application. But there are plenty of folks who would use wider ranging gearing and lower lows if they were available. All the pedicabbers I know fall into that category. 34 is available in 7-8-9-10 cassettes and/or freewheels. I wasn't aware that 10 speed clusters were offered with larger sprockets than 27t or whatever it is that Shimano and Campy see fit to produce. Its apparent you are arguing for a wider gear range just because it can be done even though it has no purpose. And you condemn 9-10 speed cassettes for not doing something pointless. Bizarre. There are identifiable, quantifiable benefits to wider gearing. Maybe not for you, but for folks who actually use their bikes and trikes for things. For cargo bikers, velomobilists, railbikers, and electric- assist bikers, wider gearing is obviously useful-- that is, it will allow them to do things that can't be done, or can't be done with a reasonable and sustainable effort, with narrower gearing. Having ten sprockets doesn't allow _anything_ that can't be done just as well with seven sprockets in the same overall range (besides wreck your rear wheel). IRD makes a 10 speed cassette in 11-34(Shimano) and 11-32(Campagnolo). Seems pretty close to 11-34 9 speed. Agreed. I didn't know about those things because the cassette hub manufacturers don't offer them. As for your 12-38 7 speed freewheel, who sells that today? That was never an off-the-shelf option. You had to build them from Suntour Winner Pro freewheels and a couple of loose sprockets. But you could do it with readily available parts. I did it a couple of times. 300+% range on the cluster. Not unless its for a special purpose bike. Sounds like the marketing for the Rohloff hub. 500+% gear range. Only problem is the huge jumps between gears to achieve that. "Huge" 13% jumps, eh? You sound like my sister who is only comfortable between 72 and 74 degrees. Maybe good for special purpose bikes. But not for ordinary enjoyable riding. I look around and see that most of the people in my town doing ordinary enjoyable riding are doing it on one-speed bikes-- fixies, cruisers, SS conversions, BMX bikes, and purpose-built SS mountain bikes. I guess that's sort of the same in principle as an ideal 10- speed "straight block" of 13-13-13-13-13-13-13-13-13-13 gearing, with nice tight 0% spacing between gears. Most of the rest of them are using derailleur bikes with no more than seven speeds on the cluster (because the bikes are old enough or cheap enough that they never had more gears than that). If you ask them how much they mind their "huge" jumps between gears, they won't know what you're talking about. The only ones with bikes whose gears have no "huge" jumps by your standards are the kit-wearing poseurs. And if you want to talk to them, you'll have to look on one of a select few roads around here on Sunday morning, chase after them, and stare down their scowls. The rest of the week, the streets belong to those who can't possibly enjoy riding because their gears are too far apart. Their smiles must be about something else. Chalo |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
Chalo Colina wrote:
russellseaton1 wrote: [...] 300+% range on the cluster. Not unless its for a special purpose bike. Sounds like the marketing for the Rohloff hub. 500+% gear range. Only problem is the huge jumps between gears to achieve that. "Huge" 13% jumps, eh? You sound like my sister who is only comfortable between 72 and 74 degrees.[...] "Humans are not Peterbilt trucks..." - Jobst Brandt -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FREEWHEELS? | datakoll | Techniques | 6 | March 8th 08 07:27 AM |
New freewheels | Doki | UK | 6 | February 26th 08 06:39 PM |
FS: 28 BMX / singlespeed freewheels | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | February 2nd 08 11:59 PM |
Ceramic bearings, worth the cost? | Chris M | Techniques | 18 | May 23rd 06 05:31 AM |
FS: 2 freewheels | Bikefixr | Marketplace | 0 | October 19th 04 08:35 PM |