|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
Bill C wrote:
On Feb 25, 9:21 pm, "MMan" wrote: On Feb 25, 7:50 pm, wrote: You can call it a technicality, but if the only reason the test results were announced as "positive" was due to the mishandling of the samples and misuse of the machines, that's not a technicality, that's one step below being framed. If they could find proof of intent, then it would be being framed. Damn right. If a tester was supposed to sign his full name and used his middle initial instead of his middle name, *that* would be a technicality. This is beginning to look like gross negligence if not a deliberate framing. Which is what a lot of us have been saying about the negligence, and political pressure being put on these labs to find athletes positive, both by politicians and Dickpounder. There have been a long trail of questioned and questionable activities, and not just by the riders either. I still can't see anyone having been deliberately framed, but I can see tests that are open to interpretation being found positive, or else, and then Pound convicting everyone in the press. The system is screwed, and hopefully everything surrounding the sport is in for a re-think shortly. Bill C Personally.. I would like to see dick poundsand get a nice healthy EPO suppositotie shoved so far up his ass he tests 'positive' until his final days. He has done nothing to combat drugs in sport, but he is a master debater on the evils of certain athletes once they are 'outed' for drug use. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
Bob Schwartz wrote:
MMan wrote: On Feb 25, 7:50 pm, wrote: You can call it a technicality, but if the only reason the test results were announced as "positive" was due to the mishandling of the samples and misuse of the machines, that's not a technicality, that's one step below being framed. If they could find proof of intent, then it would be being framed. Damn right. If a tester was supposed to sign his full name and used his middle initial instead of his middle name, *that* would be a technicality. This is beginning to look like gross negligence if not a deliberate framing. Well, I asked the house specialist in mass spectroscopy. Her feeling was that the stuff Baker came up with shouldn't matter. If there were "major leaks near the inlet capillaries" introducing contaminants, the most likely contaminants would be oxygen and nitrogen, ie air. And it would be extremely unusual to see testosterone or epitestosterone introduced as contaminants in this way. IOW, you might see stuff that was not in the original sample show up, but you wouldn't see stuff in the original sample show up as something else. If Landis' sample was contaminated with T or E, it seems reasonable to ask where the **** it could have come from. She did say that it would be very unusual to not have the documentation with the instrument. And this doesn't speak to having the same technicians analyze the A and B samples. Bob Schwartz I sonehow have a feeling the this is going to result in a widespread rework of the various anit-doping labs. I think that many organizations are going to have to come to grips with the fact that the 'sheriff', while not necessarily corrupt, is not capable of handling his deputies. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
On Feb 25, 5:51?pm, "Burt" wrote:
"the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now" Nope. We didn't dope. Or get off on a technicality. duped no more |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
On Feb 25, 5:20 pm, wrote:
On Feb 25, 5:51?pm, "Burt" wrote: "the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now" Nope. We didn't dope. Or get off on a technicality. duped no more Considering that he can't PROVE his innocence, only defend himself against the charges, a technicality may be the only way to go. The whole issue of doping is ALL about technicalities, and while it may pain you to think that a guilty party may get off due to a technicality, it's far more aggregious for an innocent party to be railroaded by an incompetent lab with incompetent techs because YOU don't think a technicality is good enough. You can call it a technicality, but if the only reason the test results were announced as "positive" was due to the mishandling of the samples and misuse of the machines, that's not a technicality, that's one step below being framed. If they could find proof of intent, then it would be being framed. I'm sorry your career didn't work out the way you wanted or expected, but Floyd shouldn't lose his livelyhood because you're still ****ed. Fred |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
On Feb 25, 7:50 pm, wrote:
You can call it a technicality, but if the only reason the test results were announced as "positive" was due to the mishandling of the samples and misuse of the machines, that's not a technicality, that's one step below being framed. If they could find proof of intent, then it would be being framed. Damn right. If a tester was supposed to sign his full name and used his middle initial instead of his middle name, *that* would be a technicality. This is beginning to look like gross negligence if not a deliberate framing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
MMan wrote:
On Feb 25, 7:50 pm, wrote: You can call it a technicality, but if the only reason the test results were announced as "positive" was due to the mishandling of the samples and misuse of the machines, that's not a technicality, that's one step below being framed. If they could find proof of intent, then it would be being framed. Damn right. If a tester was supposed to sign his full name and used his middle initial instead of his middle name, *that* would be a technicality. This is beginning to look like gross negligence if not a deliberate framing. Getting off because you were framed might also be considered a technicality by some... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
On Feb 25, 9:21 pm, "MMan" wrote:
On Feb 25, 7:50 pm, wrote: You can call it a technicality, but if the only reason the test results were announced as "positive" was due to the mishandling of the samples and misuse of the machines, that's not a technicality, that's one step below being framed. If they could find proof of intent, then it would be being framed. Damn right. If a tester was supposed to sign his full name and used his middle initial instead of his middle name, *that* would be a technicality. This is beginning to look like gross negligence if not a deliberate framing. Which is what a lot of us have been saying about the negligence, and political pressure being put on these labs to find athletes positive, both by politicians and Dickpounder. There have been a long trail of questioned and questionable activities, and not just by the riders either. I still can't see anyone having been deliberately framed, but I can see tests that are open to interpretation being found positive, or else, and then Pound convicting everyone in the press. The system is screwed, and hopefully everything surrounding the sport is in for a re-think shortly. Bill C |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
In article
, Fred Fredburger wrote: MMan wrote: On Feb 25, 7:50 pm, wrote: You can call it a technicality, but if the only reason the test results were announced as "positive" was due to the mishandling of the samples and misuse of the machines, that's not a technicality, that's one step below being framed. If they could find proof of intent, then it would be being framed. Damn right. If a tester was supposed to sign his full name and used his middle initial instead of his middle name, *that* would be a technicality. This is beginning to look like gross negligence if not a deliberate framing. Getting off because you were framed might also be considered a technicality by some... Lie down and enjoy it. -- Michael Press |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
the floyd bashers should be feeling REAL STOOPID about now...
MMan wrote:
On Feb 25, 7:50 pm, wrote: You can call it a technicality, but if the only reason the test results were announced as "positive" was due to the mishandling of the samples and misuse of the machines, that's not a technicality, that's one step below being framed. If they could find proof of intent, then it would be being framed. Damn right. If a tester was supposed to sign his full name and used his middle initial instead of his middle name, *that* would be a technicality. This is beginning to look like gross negligence if not a deliberate framing. Well, I asked the house specialist in mass spectroscopy. Her feeling was that the stuff Baker came up with shouldn't matter. If there were "major leaks near the inlet capillaries" introducing contaminants, the most likely contaminants would be oxygen and nitrogen, ie air. And it would be extremely unusual to see testosterone or epitestosterone introduced as contaminants in this way. IOW, you might see stuff that was not in the original sample show up, but you wouldn't see stuff in the original sample show up as something else. If Landis' sample was contaminated with T or E, it seems reasonable to ask where the **** it could have come from. She did say that it would be very unusual to not have the documentation with the instrument. And this doesn't speak to having the same technicians analyze the A and B samples. Bob Schwartz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad news for the Lance bashers | Bill C | Racing | 24 | September 14th 05 10:38 AM |
Stoopid ocky strap | DaveB | Australia | 3 | July 5th 05 10:50 AM |
is this a completely stoopid idea? | audrey | UK | 30 | March 4th 05 09:58 AM |
Stoopid competition question of the week | Tony Raven | UK | 21 | January 30th 05 08:53 PM |
where are all the Horner bashers???? | karlwithak | Racing | 14 | October 8th 04 06:14 PM |