London Critical Mass October ride

On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:07:40 +0000, The Medway Handyman wrote:

Peter Keller wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:07:24 +0000, JMS wrote:



ffs - 33 lines in order to post 2 lines of ****e.

Well done Porky.


Hagfish are the perfect example of the beauty of ugly. Hagfish are
deep- sea
creatures with an eel-like body shape. Reaching 3-feet in length, they
are jawless,
boneless, scaleless deep-sea scavengers that ooze slime - buckets of
slime. Hagfish
are so disgusting scientists shudder when they accidentally catch one.
When asked to
describe hagfish deep-sea researcher Tamara Frank said,
"Bleeeecccchhh." She added,
"I know they play a very important role in the marine ecosystem, but
bleeecccchhhh!"

Keller. A complete ****wit from NZ with a serious mental problem.

Why thank you kind sir for your complete accolade as to my achievements!
I am now working towards the next step of being utterly despicable ****-
for-brains pathetic nincompoop stench-rotting nostril-curdling
decomposing octopus!
Thank you once again sweetie --

*Smooch*


--
67.4% of statistics are made up.

On Nov 2, 6:11*pm, Tony Dragon wrote:
On 02/11/2010 07:30, Doug wrote:



On 1 Nov, 19:26, (Roger Merriman) wrote:
*wrote:
On Oct 31, 6:47 am, *wrote:
BTW, I have in the past ridden in club rides, which similarly
sometimes ride on pavements and go through red lights etc., but they
are not deemed in law to be a special 'procession' as is London CM.

I went out on a club ride yesterday, Doug. *We obeyed all relevant
laws, including stopping at red lights. *It's really not difficult to
do.

indeed, further to that most if not all clubs will atempt to follow the
law, certinaly no RLJ or pavement riding etc.

They do mostly but I have known club rides in the past which have
not.

It is probably true to say that everyone breaks some law or other
sometime or other,

Well you do it all the time.

So do you.

given the proliferation of laws, some of which
place cyclists lives in danger in order to accommodate drivers..
Allowing street garaging of cars,

Which is not against the law.

Unfortunately but it should be.

with its flung open doors, is a
prime example. Allowing life threatening air pollution and speeds from
cars is another.

It is also probably true to say that most cyclists who suffer the
inconvenience of riding on pavements are scared ****less of our busy
roads.

Or they could just be lazy sods who think rules do no apply to them.

Cycling on pavements is much more difficult that cycling on roads, due
to the amount of clutter and discontinuous surfaces.

Similarly RLJ may sometimes offer greater safety from a mass of
fast accelerating traffic.

But of course endangers other road users.

Not necessarily and not nearly as much as dangerous drivers.

BTW, drivers kill cyclists but cyclists do not kill drivers.


-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
*http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

On Nov 6, 7:27*am, Doug wrote:


Cycling on pavements is much more difficult that cycling on roads, due
to the amount of clutter and discontinuous surfaces.

Does that *clutter* include pedestrians? In my experience as a
pedestrian, you get a load of verbal abuse if you dare get in the way
of a fast moving cyclist on a pavement, even though it is designated
for the use of pedestrians!

Similarly RLJ may sometimes offer greater safety from a mass of
fast accelerating traffic.

But of course endangers other road users.

Not necessarily and not nearly as much as dangerous drivers.

Other road users include pedestrians on light controlled crossings and
junctions. They are sometimes knocked over and injured or killed by
RLJing cyclists.

Derek C
unlicenced bicycles are a weapon to kill

On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:08:38 +0000, The Medway Handyman wrote:
..


Keller. A complete ****wit from NZ with a serious mental problem.

Why thank you kind sir for agreeing with my message, which of course has
nothing to do with my disgusting personality.
Thank you again sweety

*SMOOCH!!*



--
67.4% of statistics are made up.

On 06/11/2010 07:27, Doug wrote:
On Nov 2, 6:11 pm, Tony wrote:
On 02/11/2010 07:30, Doug wrote:



On 1 Nov, 19:26, (Roger Merriman) wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 31, 6:47 am, wrote:
BTW, I have in the past ridden in club rides, which similarly
sometimes ride on pavements and go through red lights etc., but they
are not deemed in law to be a special 'procession' as is London CM.

I went out on a club ride yesterday, Doug. We obeyed all relevant
laws, including stopping at red lights. It's really not difficult to
do.

indeed, further to that most if not all clubs will atempt to follow the
law, certinaly no RLJ or pavement riding etc.

They do mostly but I have known club rides in the past which have
not.

It is probably true to say that everyone breaks some law or other
sometime or other,

Well you do it all the time.

So do you.

You have no proof of that, but you admit to using an illegal vehicle.


given the proliferation of laws, some of which
place cyclists lives in danger in order to accommodate drivers..
Allowing street garaging of cars,

Which is not against the law.

Unfortunately but it should be.

Glad you agree that street parking as such, is not against the law,


with its flung open doors, is a
prime example. Allowing life threatening air pollution and speeds from
cars is another.

It is also probably true to say that most cyclists who suffer the
inconvenience of riding on pavements are scared ****less of our busy
roads.

Or they could just be lazy sods who think rules do no apply to them.

Cycling on pavements is much more difficult that cycling on roads, due
to the amount of clutter and discontinuous surfaces.

If it's that difficult don't do it, lack of mention of pedestrians noted.


Similarly RLJ may sometimes offer greater safety from a mass of
fast accelerating traffic.

But of course endangers other road users.

Not necessarily and not nearly as much as dangerous drivers.

As I have previously stated, I have never had to dodge a motor vehicle
driving over a crossing while the green man is showing, I have to do it
at least twice a week for cyclists

BTW, drivers kill cyclists but cyclists do not kill drivers.

Which has nothing to do with lawbreaking



-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.




--
Tony Dragon

Doug wrote:

On 1 Nov, 19:26, (Roger Merriman) wrote:
BrianW wrote:
On Oct 31, 6:47 am, Doug wrote:
BTW, I have in the past ridden in club rides, which similarly
sometimes ride on pavements and go through red lights etc., but they
are not deemed in law to be a special 'procession' as is London CM.

I went out on a club ride yesterday, Doug. We obeyed all relevant
laws, including stopping at red lights. It's really not difficult to
do.

indeed, further to that most if not all clubs will atempt to follow the
law, certinaly no RLJ or pavement riding etc.

They do mostly but I have known club rides in the past which have
not.

I've found that to be rare.

It is probably true to say that everyone breaks some law or other
sometime or other, given the proliferation of laws, some of which
place cyclists lives in danger in order to accommodate drivers..
Allowing street garaging of cars, with its flung open doors, is a
prime example. Allowing life threatening air pollution and speeds from
cars is another.

um a lot of that is legal. my street has cars double parked sometimes,
but kids still play in the street, cars and bikes have to wait for them,
as it should be.

It is also probably true to say that most cyclists who suffer the
inconvenience of riding on pavements are scared ****less of our busy
roads. Similarly RLJ may sometimes offer greater safety from a mass of
fast accelerating traffic.

`They may say that but I dought that they have though of it at all to be
honest.

ps your sig is still broken.

Roger
--
www.rogermerriman.com