|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
The Chicago Sun-Times ran an online poll today asking, "Which occupant
of Chicago streets is more annoying: bikers, drivers or pedestrians?" The result? 44% found cyclists to be more annoying than drivers (43%) or pedestrians (12%). Sounds pretty conclusive, doesn't it. Ah, but wait- only 264 votes were cast. There are roughly 10 million people in the Chicago metro area. If only 10% of those drive (a conservative guesstimate) that is still a million people. 264 out of a million doesn't sound like a very meaningful survey group to me but some on either 'side' will point to the survey as proof we need more legislation, more bike paths, more education, etcetera when all we really need is to just laugh such silliness off and go ride. Regards, Bob P.S.- And if we happen to be riding in the Chicago metro area we should try not to annoy the 116 that voted us most annoying. g |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
Bob Hunt wrote:
The Chicago Sun-Times ran an online poll today asking, "Which occupant of Chicago streets is more annoying: bikers, drivers or pedestrians?" "Bikers" are definitely the most annoying, due to the noise a V-twin with straight pipes makes. One can only wonder why they are not ticketed more often. The result? 44% found cyclists to be more annoying than drivers (43%) or pedestrians (12%). Sounds pretty conclusive, doesn't it. Ah, but wait- only 264 votes were cast. There are roughly 10 million people in the Chicago metro area. If only 10% of those drive (a conservative guesstimate) that is still a million people. 264 out of a million doesn't sound like a very meaningful survey group to me but some on either 'side' will point to the survey as proof we need more legislation, more bike paths, more education, etcetera when all we really need is to just laugh such silliness off and go ride.[...] Self-selecting polls are hardly scientific. Of course, maybe the Sun Times only has 264 readers left? -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
In article ,
Bob writes: The Chicago Sun-Times ran an online poll today asking, "Which occupant of Chicago streets is more annoying: bikers, drivers or pedestrians?" The result? 44% found cyclists to be more annoying than drivers (43%) or pedestrians (12%). Sounds pretty conclusive, doesn't it. Ah, but wait- only 264 votes were cast. There are roughly 10 million people in the Chicago metro area. If only 10% of those drive (a conservative guesstimate) that is still a million people. 264 out of a million doesn't sound like a very meaningful survey group to me but some on either 'side' will point to the survey as proof we need more legislation, more bike paths, more education, etcetera when all we really need is to just laugh such silliness off and go ride. What really annoys me is shops who stick much of their inventories out onto the sidewalk, narrowing the passageway. I bet that ~really~ annoys blind people. Then there are folks who insist on parking their cars right where driveways intersect sidewalks. Nuclear arms races are pretty annoying, too. (Pakistan and India had better smarten up.) So are people who sit beside me on the bus or rapid transit train while they're holding an open cup of coffee or a Slurpee. And y'know what? There's an ettiquette to wielding an umbrella. At least, there should be. Then there's the pedestrians who are so absorbed by their music playback devices, they're lost to the real world. They'd better watch out for those shops with all their crap out on the sidewalk. Especially on Vanouver's Main St, lest they accidentally get their foot stuck in an antique brass cuspidor or aspidastra outside a 2nd hand shop. Back in the '70s, people could put a tune on, on their high-falootin' Sound System, and then waste time turning knobs and sliding or pushing buttons to get The Perfect Sound, and then the tune's over without even being listened-to. Now people can do all that while afoot. Good ol' progress. Frobnication for the nation. I'm almost willing to bet I'm the only person in the world who wrote the word: "aspidastra" online today. I probably misspelt it. The word looks like it needs an 'e' or two. Anyways, humanity is lovable. Even though some of our ranks disgustingly walk down the street while being fat & jiggly, and conspicuous-consumptionly cramming quasi-food into their cake holes. Maybe having to occasionally lean against streetlights while catching their breath. As I recall, Chicago is notorious for those big, soft pretzels that go so well, dunked in the right kind of mustard. We humans can be so easily tempted. We celebrate various forms of strength in or popular celebrities, but our weaknesses are really what connects us. Plus the strength of our caring for our fellows, even though it doesn't always manifest. cheers, Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
On 2009-06-22, Tom Keats wrote:
I'm almost willing to bet I'm the only person in the world who wrote the word: "aspidastra" online today. I probably misspelt it. The word looks like it needs an 'e' or two. Aspidistra. I only know what one is because it was a crucial plot element in a high school play I was in. Top rant, Tom. I enjoyed reading that, and many of the same things annoy me! But life's too short to go around being annoyed by things isn't it? -- John |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
Bob wrote:
The Chicago Sun-Times ran an online poll today asking, "Which occupant of Chicago streets is more annoying: bikers, drivers or pedestrians?" The result? 44% found cyclists to be more annoying than drivers (43%) or pedestrians (12%). Sounds pretty conclusive, doesn't it. Ah, but wait- only 264 votes were cast. There are roughly 10 million people in the Chicago metro area. If only 10% of those drive (a conservative guesstimate) that is still a million people. 264 out of a million doesn't sound like a very meaningful survey group to me but some on either 'side' will point to the survey as proof we need more legislation, more bike paths, more education, etcetera when all we really need is to just laugh such silliness off and go ride. Regards, Bob P.S.- And if we happen to be riding in the Chicago metro area we should try not to annoy the 116 that voted us most annoying. g What we really need: http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2004...nside-the-box/ "The communications box will contain a digital map of the road network. To turn it into a road safety device, you need only add the local speed limits and connect it to the engine management system. When the box detects that the speed limit has dropped, it warns the driver, blocks the accelarator and applies the brakes. Local sensors can tell the digital map when weather conditions are bad, and bring the car’s speed down to match them." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
Bob wrote:
The Chicago Sun-Times ran an online poll today asking, "Which occupant of Chicago streets is more annoying: bikers, drivers or pedestrians?" The result? 44% found cyclists to be more annoying than drivers (43%) or pedestrians (12%). Sounds pretty conclusive, doesn't it. Ah, but wait- only 264 votes were cast. There are roughly 10 million people in the Chicago metro area. If only 10% of those drive (a conservative guesstimate) that is still a million people. 264 out of a million doesn't sound like a very meaningful survey group to me but some on either 'side' will point to the survey as proof we need more legislation, more bike paths, more education, etcetera when all we really need is to just laugh such silliness off and go ride. Regards, Bob P.S.- And if we happen to be riding in the Chicago metro area we should try not to annoy the 116 that voted us most annoying. g If someone liked bicycling, I would wonder why they would choose to live an an urban area to begin with. It's rather like a professional snow-skier living in the middle of Death Valley. ~ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
The Chicago Sun-Times ran an online poll today asking, "Which
occupant of Chicago streets is more annoying: bikers, drivers or pedestrians?" =v= I hate when newspapers do these thoroughly-unscientific "polls" on topics that are entirely about emotion. They may as well ask which race is the most annoying and print the results without any demographic breakdown. _Jym_ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
DougC wrote:
Bob wrote: The Chicago Sun-Times ran an online poll today asking, "Which occupant of Chicago streets is more annoying: bikers, drivers or pedestrians?" The result? 44% found cyclists to be more annoying than drivers (43%) or pedestrians (12%). Sounds pretty conclusive, doesn't it. Ah, but wait- only 264 votes were cast. There are roughly 10 million people in the Chicago metro area. If only 10% of those drive (a conservative guesstimate) that is still a million people. 264 out of a million doesn't sound like a very meaningful survey group to me but some on either 'side' will point to the survey as proof we need more legislation, more bike paths, more education, etcetera when all we really need is to just laugh such silliness off and go ride. Regards, Bob P.S.- And if we happen to be riding in the Chicago metro area we should try not to annoy the 116 that voted us most annoying. g If someone liked bicycling, I would wonder why they would choose to live an an urban area to begin with. It's rather like a professional snow-skier living in the middle of Death Valley. ~ I prefer riding in the city to most other places. High density and short distances make utility cycling practical, and even for recreational riding, there are lots more interesting places to go. Any typical weekend day in the summer it seems, I can't help but encounter some sort of event or festival, usually several. While I haven't cycled Chicago, it seems to me it would be a pretty nice place to ride. In New England we have lots of winding country roads which can be very pleasant scenery-wise. I have friends who have relocated to other, more recently developed, parts of the country who complain there's "nowhere to ride" because secondary roads are uncommon, lots of limited access roads linking essentially cul-de-sac communities. The most unpleasant part of my long rides in the countryside is getting through the suburban belt. Fortunately, here in Boston, it's not quite so deep as elsewhere, but there's been enough recent sprawl that some routes are just not worth the effort anymore. A lot of America is just pretty flat & boring, even where you have reasonable secondary roads. Cities are always interesting, rural areas sometimes, suburbs never. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"news" from Chicago
In article ,
DougC writes: Bob wrote: The Chicago Sun-Times ran an online poll today asking, "Which occupant of Chicago streets is more annoying: bikers, drivers or pedestrians?" The result? 44% found cyclists to be more annoying than drivers (43%) or pedestrians (12%). Sounds pretty conclusive, doesn't it. Ah, but wait- only 264 votes were cast. There are roughly 10 million people in the Chicago metro area. If only 10% of those drive (a conservative guesstimate) that is still a million people. 264 out of a million doesn't sound like a very meaningful survey group to me but some on either 'side' will point to the survey as proof we need more legislation, more bike paths, more education, etcetera when all we really need is to just laugh such silliness off and go ride. Regards, Bob P.S.- And if we happen to be riding in the Chicago metro area we should try not to annoy the 116 that voted us most annoying. g If someone liked bicycling, I would wonder why they would choose to live an an urban area to begin with. It's rather like a professional snow-skier living in the middle of Death Valley. ~ I wonder why so many people opt to drive their POV/SOV cars for short, infra-city trips. So many traffic lights, trying to find parking spots, so much bulky machinery just to convey one or two people around. And when it comes to maneouverability, cars are such awkward, lumbering mechanical beasts; they hold up the rest of the traffic when they're being parallel-parked, sometimes it takes a few attempts. In the city, cars get in the way of other cars, riders and pedestrians, much more than riders and pedestrians get in the way of cars. By bike-riding in the city, one avoids being an impediment to fellow citizens, while also avoiding being impeded by fellow citizens. I find it more sociable and civilised. cheers, Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NEWS FLASH: Gays are "Destroying Society" | MagillaGorilla[_2_] | Racing | 9 | December 4th 08 02:33 PM |
"John "Cho" Gilmer keeps publishing his "Manifesto" over and over." | Hoodini | Racing | 0 | April 23rd 07 12:38 AM |
NEWS ARTICLE: "On a wheel and a prayer" | MuniAddict | Unicycling | 11 | September 20th 06 04:50 PM |
"Live at 205" news feature (6mb) | terrybigwheel | Unicycling | 7 | May 18th 06 09:57 PM |
Joey and "tapping" back in the news. | crit PRO | Racing | 1 | February 4th 06 08:19 AM |