|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lotto to sue Astana, Vino
I predicted this would happen. Predictor-Lotto to sue Vino and Astana http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?...l07/jul26news3 Will this clean up the sport ? money is a very powerful motivator. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lotto to sue Astana, Vino
In article . com,
" wrote: I predicted this would happen. Predictor-Lotto to sue Vino and Astana http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?...l07/jul26news3 Will this clean up the sport ? No. This seems pretty pitiful to me. -- tanx, Howard Never take a tenant with a monkey. remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lotto to sue Astana, Vino
Howard Kveck writes:
In article . com, " wrote: I predicted this would happen. Predictor-Lotto to sue Vino and Astana http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?...l07/jul26news3 Will this clean up the sport ? No. This seems pretty pitiful to me. What we need is Mr. Clean http://azurservers.com/rbr/mrclean.jpg -- Davey Crockett - No 4Q to Reply - All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.-Edmund Burke |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lotto to sue Astana, Vino
Dans le message de
, Howard Kveck a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré : In article . com, " wrote: I predicted this would happen. Predictor-Lotto to sue Vino and Astana http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?...l07/jul26news3 Will this clean up the sport ? No. This seems pretty pitiful to me. I'm not quite in agreement. What has happened is the exposure of the gulf between "sport" and commercial entertainment. The big end of the pyramid is populated by the vast majority of cyclists, and the top by the monopolies (UCI, ASO, IOC). Power and money are concentrated at the top, and the blind idiocy of all national federations has been to push riders to go there. "Grass roots" programs are not designed to encourage sport or sportsmanship, but to identify contenders, and to move them along. Those who happily contest their weekly club races, who challenge you to the next stop sign - those are guys I am happy to ride with, to help out with a spare tube, to share some beer with. There's nothing wrong with top-level competition, so long as it remains a sport, and there is reason to admire the people who compete at that level. But when money comes into the equation, lots of money, lots of power, "sport" disappears. Just looking at the published basis for the lawsuit shows what is really important - it's the capacity to gain a corporate return on investment. I invest, also, in cycling. I ride and I try to go faster. I have bought bikes and stuff I thought could suit those goals. I don't train any more, because it's been a while since I was young enough to impress. When club riders look at their club jerseys, do they imagine that their sponsors just love cycling so very much, that the support is just a benevolent gift to the sport? My club, this past 2 years, has had its first sponsors, small time businesses. I didn't buy a jersey. I don't think the local Peugeot dealer really cares about me. It's OK to admire the great riders. And it's not important whether they ate bran flakes or injected insulin to the top. Great riders are there because they have the genetics, the drive, and the need to win. Being the first or the eleventh loser is not important when we engage in sport, but winning is everything when it's a business. TV time for a jersey, for example. That's a kind of winning. I think of the multitude of things I have done as a lawyer to win, and some of it bothers me, still. That's why I am hanging it up, right now, this summer. I don't plan to ride in the winter - I'll cross-country ski - or I'll get fat and fill out that Mad Dog "Wide Load" jersey my daughter gave me a while ago. Bicycle sport is virtually absent as a subject of discussion in this forum. I'll continue to read the comments of fellow riders, maybe comment. But so long as Big Cycling's focus remains on money, I don't plan to take any of it seriously. Not the excuses of Millar, a born-again angel, not the evasions of yesterday's yellow jersey holder, not the feigned indignation of Prudhomme, quasi-monopolist power grabber and Grand Inquisitor. It's pitiful, to be sure, but it doesn't deserve the attention we seem to be giving it. -- Bonne route ! Sandy Verneuil-sur-Seine FR |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lotto to sue Astana, Vino
"Davey Crockett" wrote in message ... Will this clean up the sport ? No. This seems pretty pitiful to me. What we need is Mr. Clean http://azurservers.com/rbr/mrclean.jpg Great. Another muscle-y, bald headed guy. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lotto to sue Astana, Vino
In article , "Sandy"
wrote: Dans le message de , Howard Kveck a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré : In article . com, " wrote: I predicted this would happen. Predictor-Lotto to sue Vino and Astana This seems pretty pitiful to me. I'm not quite in agreement. What has happened is the exposure of the gulf between "sport" and commercial entertainment. The big end of the pyramid is populated by the vast majority of cyclists, and the top by the monopolies (UCI, ASO, IOC). Power and money are concentrated at the top, and the blind idiocy of all national federations has been to push riders to go there. "Grass roots" programs are not designed to encourage sport or sportsmanship, but to identify contenders, and to move them along. Those who happily contest their weekly club races, who challenge you to the next stop sign - those are guys I am happy to ride with, to help out with a spare tube, to share some beer with. There's nothing wrong with top-level competition, so long as it remains a sport, and there is reason to admire the people who compete at that level. But when money comes into the equation, lots of money, lots of power, "sport" disappears. Just looking at the published basis for the lawsuit shows what is really important - it's the capacity to gain a corporate return on investment. I invest, also, in cycling. I ride and I try to go faster. I have bought bikes and stuff I thought could suit those goals. I don't train any more, because it's been a while since I was young enough to impress. When club riders look at their club jerseys, do they imagine that their sponsors just love cycling so very much, that the support is just a benevolent gift to the sport? My club, this past 2 years, has had its first sponsors, small time businesses. I didn't buy a jersey. I don't think the local Peugeot dealer really cares about me. It's OK to admire the great riders. And it's not important whether they ate bran flakes or injected insulin to the top. Great riders are there because they have the genetics, the drive, and the need to win. Being the first or the eleventh loser is not important when we engage in sport, but winning is everything when it's a business. TV time for a jersey, for example. That's a kind of winning. I think of the multitude of things I have done as a lawyer to win, and some of it bothers me, still. That's why I am hanging it up, right now, this summer. I don't plan to ride in the winter - I'll cross-country ski - or I'll get fat and fill out that Mad Dog "Wide Load" jersey my daughter gave me a while ago. Bicycle sport is virtually absent as a subject of discussion in this forum. I'll continue to read the comments of fellow riders, maybe comment. But so long as Big Cycling's focus remains on money, I don't plan to take any of it seriously. Not the excuses of Millar, a born-again angel, not the evasions of yesterday's yellow jersey holder, not the feigned indignation of Prudhomme, quasi-monopolist power grabber and Grand Inquisitor. It's pitiful, to be sure, but it doesn't deserve the attention we seem to be giving it. Well put, Sandy. You know, I'm quite aware of the commercial entertainment aspects of this sport and the influence it has on the sport. The threat of a suit over this really brings it into a very sharp focus and that's the part I don't really care for. I suppose you could say it's like seeing the sausage making process from the very start to the finish - once you've seen that, you may not want to have so much sausage in the future. Obviously, the sponsors aren't there for altruistic reasons (though I believe there are some who are more enthusiastic about the *sport* than others), so they certainly will expect a return on their investment. Plus, it seems like a step onto a slippery slope. Prudhomme is an annoying guy, isn't he? -- tanx, Howard Never take a tenant with a monkey. remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lotto to sue Astana, Vino
Howard Kveck wrote:
I suppose you could say it's like seeing the sausage making process from the very start to the finish - once you've seen that, you may not want to have so much sausage in the future. Its more like seeing the andoulette making process. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vino Positive - Astana Pulls Out | Jack Hollis | Racing | 86 | July 28th 07 02:30 AM |
Davitamon-Lotto becomes Predictor-Lotto.. | [email protected] | Racing | 13 | November 16th 06 03:40 PM |
Davitamon-Lotto becomes Predictor-Lotto | gplama | Australia | 12 | November 9th 06 09:17 AM |
Astana | [email protected] | Racing | 1 | August 16th 06 06:56 PM |
Astana-Wurth and Vino | Simon Brooke | Racing | 2 | July 1st 06 06:44 AM |