|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 5:55:19 PM UTC-4, Joerg wrote:
On 2018-10-10 14:29, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 3:14 PM, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-10 09:19, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 10:54 AM, Joerg wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgybEXkhvHQ "At Exposure, we feel it's as important to use good lights throughout the day, as well as at night." ... um, because we're trying to sell the things, of course! I don't use flash mode on my front lights though. Then you disagree with the source you cited? No. Those bright lights are visible enough in non-flash mode. Speaking of visible enough: My wife and I just returned from a little ride. We rode out to the suburban branch of our credit union to cash a check, then a bit beyond it into sort of semi-rural roads. We returned by different roads. We were on some quiet residential streets, some former farm roads that are now short cuts to housing developments, a bit on an arterial road or two with 50 mph traffic, etc. Quite a few miles were on lanes that were obviously too narrow to share (like 9 feet wide) so we rode at lane center. As usual, we had no problems with any drivers. (Well, except a couple who were clogging things up while they seemed to be looking for entrances to some obscure businesses). And there was absolutely no indication that anyone had any trouble seeing us. Apparently, we were visible enough. Our bikes both had dynamo powered lights, but neither of us had them on. Some people are not so lucky in the lane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGD5P_LHEHs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abqysSwOcIQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqbbiRxoWR4 -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ So you manages to find ONE incident each in Britain, Australia and Tennessee U.S.A. Oh the GREAT DANGER! Geeze Joerg, if bicycling is so darn dangerous why do you do it? Or is that why you consume so much beer = to get courage enough to ride those deadly roads and trails? Cheers |
Ads |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 6:14:44 PM UTC-4, jbeattie wrote:
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 1:57:03 PM UTC-7, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 1:26:01 PM UTC-4, jbeattie wrote: On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 9:35:17 AM UTC-7, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 1:35 AM, news18 wrote: On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:02:14 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: I've tried rain pants only once, IIRC. IMO there can't possibly be enough ventilation. But I admit, I know no really comfortable way of riding in the rain. Use 1: a cape, 2: mudguards and 3: sandals. (Wool soxes/socks if it is cold). Caveat, I made the cape myself. Plenty of ventilation. That's what I usually use, except for the sandals part, although I have friends who love their riding sandals. The mud flap on my fender takes care of most road spray at my feet. Shoe covers over my toe clips offer further help when necessary. But I'm still not really comfortable riding in the rain, unless it's the lightest sprinkle. I've never used a rain cape and hate things that flap. For long rides in the rain, I wear basically this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIzz9VBdKCU Showers Pass jacket, PI Amfib tights, Gore booties (or one of my four or five pairs of booties). I wear a poly pro base layer and a mid-layer. This time of year, wool is a good mid-layer. I have some lightweight long-finger Giro gloves my son got on pro deal that are good for early fall, and I switch to more robust gloves as the temperatures drop. That video has snippets of Larch Mountain (cut back and forth with hills practically in my back yard -- odd), which is a 14.5 mile climb and probably the hardest ride for picking clothing since it can be 50F at the bottom and snow at the top. You have to have something that vents really well for the climb, stays relatively dry and zips up tight for the descent. I also take a light vest and an ear band or balaclava to put on at the top. I've told this story before, but the RT from my house to the top of Larch Mountain is 90 miles depending on route, and I did it with some friends entirely in the rain -- all day from beginning to end. Everyone got hypothermic on the descent. We had to stop repeatedly to warm up. Half the group called their wives for a ride home from Corbett. I had pretty good layering and revitalized with a life-saving corn dog at the Corbett store (and stood over a heating vent) http://columbiariverimages.com/Image...t_06-30-14.jpg , and although I suffered in the freezing rain coming down the mountain, the ride home was reasonably comfortable. Everything soaks through eventually, and you have to pick layers that will keep you reasonably warm when wet. IMO, booties are the most important. I can't stand cold swamp feet. Everybody has fenders and rain bikes. You get shunned on a group ride if you don't have flaps on your fenders. https://www.flickr.com/photos/krheap...7632139896627/ -- Jay Beattie. I still remember the bicycling adage folr when riding in the rain especially a heavy rain. "You're wet and cold or you're wet and warm but either way you're wet". That adage was true whether one was wearing waterproof breathable clothing, waterproof only clothing or regular clothing. When honking up a steep climb or otherwise exerting myself I found that the waterproof breathable jackets didn't vent sweat or other body moisture fast enough to prevent my clothing getting wet. At least the jacket was windproof which stopped me from getting hypothermia. BTW, true hypothermia requires medical treatment and can NOT be overcome simple by standing someplace warm. In fact true hypothermia plus an external heating source can be fatal. One of the greatest treatments for hypothermia these days is to give the victim WARM air or oxygen via a face mask so that the body warms from the inside towards the outside. Well, lucky for me, I was riding with my panniers filled with, among other things, a heart bypass machine and an O2 bottle. I used the bypass machine to recirculate and warm my blood and huffed a little on the 02. There were a whole bunch of other cyclists suffering like me, so I warmed their blood too, and then I pulled them back to Portland with my rope. I always keep rope with me so I can tow people. We all stopped at a brewpub on the way home. The people at the pub said, "hey, don't you know that it's raining out there!" We had a big laugh together. -- Jay Beattie. +10! ROTFLMAO Cheers |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:05:06 -0700, Joerg
wrote: On 2018-10-10 15:44, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:54:40 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-09 17:01, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 07:57:06 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-08 17:22, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 16:16:43 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-08 16:05, John B. Slocomb wrote: [...] ... but having said that I might comment that it is not difficult to change socks, even sitting on the roadside curb. And change all the other things sitting on a curb in a business park? I rather flick a little switch and have instant visibility. Upon arrival I flick it again, visibility turns off. Simple. As I said, I noticed the orange socks going up and down a kilometer away on a bright summer day. I doubt strongly whether your super-duper light would even be visible (in bright daylight) at that distance. It sure is. I can say that for sure because this occasionally happens on Green Valley Road when I have to use the car and another cyclist has such good lighting. No orange socks. The riders with good lights are often longhaul bike commuters. They wear nice shirts, khakis and have panniers for their laptops and stuff. Strange you know. I used to be a sailor and even the navigation lights on a ship that must be visible from a 3 mile distance are hardly noticeable in broad daylight. Compared to a MagicShine or similar light many red and green position lights on ships are rather dim. Also, I do not need to be seen from 3mi away but from 1/2mi away I sometimes want to be seen. I see. A light that can be seen from a 3 mile distance is rather dim while a light that can be seen from 1/2 a mile is O.K.??? https://www.go2marine.com/product/16...onet-base.html Navigation light: 30W incandescent, efficiency about 20 lumens/watt (if you are lucky), omnidirectional 360 degrees, only vertically focused. Mine: 8W LED, efficiency about 100 lumens/watt, not omnidirectional but 60 degree horizontal spread, similar vertical focus. I trust you can do the math. You certainly do not know your subject. You carefully selected a nav light for a tiny little boat while I was talking about lights for "ships". See http://www.nauticexpo.com/prod/perko...71-215905.html and then look up the light bulb (0374001CLR) which is a 30 watt bulb. As for your claimed efficiency of the LED, so what? Can it be see from three miles away? Certainly the U.S. Government, nor any other country that I know of certifies shipping lights by watts, whether LED or other . They all seem to say effectively the same thing - you gotta be able to see it from a long way away. -- Cheers John B. |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:27:29 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot
wrote: On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 5:55:19 PM UTC-4, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-10 14:29, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 3:14 PM, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-10 09:19, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 10:54 AM, Joerg wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgybEXkhvHQ "At Exposure, we feel it's as important to use good lights throughout the day, as well as at night." ... um, because we're trying to sell the things, of course! I don't use flash mode on my front lights though. Then you disagree with the source you cited? No. Those bright lights are visible enough in non-flash mode. Speaking of visible enough: My wife and I just returned from a little ride. We rode out to the suburban branch of our credit union to cash a check, then a bit beyond it into sort of semi-rural roads. We returned by different roads. We were on some quiet residential streets, some former farm roads that are now short cuts to housing developments, a bit on an arterial road or two with 50 mph traffic, etc. Quite a few miles were on lanes that were obviously too narrow to share (like 9 feet wide) so we rode at lane center. As usual, we had no problems with any drivers. (Well, except a couple who were clogging things up while they seemed to be looking for entrances to some obscure businesses). And there was absolutely no indication that anyone had any trouble seeing us. Apparently, we were visible enough. Our bikes both had dynamo powered lights, but neither of us had them on. Some people are not so lucky in the lane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGD5P_LHEHs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abqysSwOcIQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqbbiRxoWR4 -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ So you manages to find ONE incident each in Britain, Australia and Tennessee U.S.A. Oh the GREAT DANGER! Geeze Joerg, if bicycling is so darn dangerous why do you do it? Or is that why you consume so much beer = to get courage enough to ride those deadly roads and trails? Cheers Given that the reports I read say that as many as 30% of the bicyclists that die in crashes had been drinking it might appear that Jeorg is an accident waiting to happen. Bright lights or no lights. -- Cheers John B. |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On 10/10/2018 6:14 PM, jbeattie wrote:
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 1:57:03 PM UTC-7, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 1:26:01 PM UTC-4, jbeattie wrote: On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 9:35:17 AM UTC-7, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 1:35 AM, news18 wrote: On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:02:14 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: I've tried rain pants only once, IIRC. IMO there can't possibly be enough ventilation. But I admit, I know no really comfortable way of riding in the rain. Use 1: a cape, 2: mudguards and 3: sandals. (Wool soxes/socks if it is cold). Caveat, I made the cape myself. Plenty of ventilation. That's what I usually use, except for the sandals part, although I have friends who love their riding sandals. The mud flap on my fender takes care of most road spray at my feet. Shoe covers over my toe clips offer further help when necessary. But I'm still not really comfortable riding in the rain, unless it's the lightest sprinkle. I've never used a rain cape and hate things that flap. For long rides in the rain, I wear basically this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIzz9VBdKCU Showers Pass jacket, PI Amfib tights, Gore booties (or one of my four or five pairs of booties). I wear a poly pro base layer and a mid-layer. This time of year, wool is a good mid-layer. I have some lightweight long-finger Giro gloves my son got on pro deal that are good for early fall, and I switch to more robust gloves as the temperatures drop. That video has snippets of Larch Mountain (cut back and forth with hills practically in my back yard -- odd), which is a 14.5 mile climb and probably the hardest ride for picking clothing since it can be 50F at the bottom and snow at the top. You have to have something that vents really well for the climb, stays relatively dry and zips up tight for the descent. I also take a light vest and an ear band or balaclava to put on at the top. I've told this story before, but the RT from my house to the top of Larch Mountain is 90 miles depending on route, and I did it with some friends entirely in the rain -- all day from beginning to end. Everyone got hypothermic on the descent. We had to stop repeatedly to warm up. Half the group called their wives for a ride home from Corbett. I had pretty good layering and revitalized with a life-saving corn dog at the Corbett store (and stood over a heating vent) http://columbiariverimages.com/Image...t_06-30-14.jpg , and although I suffered in the freezing rain coming down the mountain, the ride home was reasonably comfortable. Everything soaks through eventually, and you have to pick layers that will keep you reasonably warm when wet. IMO, booties are the most important. I can't stand cold swamp feet. Everybody has fenders and rain bikes. You get shunned on a group ride if you don't have flaps on your fenders. https://www.flickr.com/photos/krheap...7632139896627/ -- Jay Beattie. I still remember the bicycling adage folr when riding in the rain especially a heavy rain. "You're wet and cold or you're wet and warm but either way you're wet". That adage was true whether one was wearing waterproof breathable clothing, waterproof only clothing or regular clothing. When honking up a steep climb or otherwise exerting myself I found that the waterproof breathable jackets didn't vent sweat or other body moisture fast enough to prevent my clothing getting wet. At least the jacket was windproof which stopped me from getting hypothermia. BTW, true hypothermia requires medical treatment and can NOT be overcome simple by standing someplace warm. In fact true hypothermia plus an external heating source can be fatal. One of the greatest treatments for hypothermia these days is to give the victim WARM air or oxygen via a face mask so that the body warms from the inside towards the outside. Well, lucky for me, I was riding with my panniers filled with, among other things, a heart bypass machine and an O2 bottle. I used the bypass machine to recirculate and warm my blood and huffed a little on the 02. There were a whole bunch of other cyclists suffering like me, so I warmed their blood too, and then I pulled them back to Portland with my rope. I always keep rope with me so I can tow people. We all stopped at a brewpub on the way home. The people at the pub said, "hey, don't you know that it's raining out there!" We had a big laugh together. :-) -- - Frank Krygowski |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On 10/10/2018 7:48 PM, sms wrote:
On 10/10/2018 2:55 PM, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-10 14:29, Frank Krygowski wrote: Apparently, we were visible enough. Our bikes both had dynamo powered lights, but neither of us had them on. Some people are not so lucky in the lane. How do you explain to someone that just because they engaged in dangerous behavior and got lucky that it does not prove that what they did was intelligent or logical? In their minds, the fact that they were lucky is absolute proof that what they did was a good idea. sigh The techniques of riding lane centered for conspicuity have been taught in cycling courses and written about in books and pamphlets since at least the 1970s. And for normal conditions, those sources have NOT required that the cyclists use daytime running lights. This mania about the necessity of lights in daytime has popped up only in the past few years. And it's not coincidental that it popped up when high lumen LEDs allowed lots of new bike lights to be marketed. To put it more briefly: Road position works. Glaring daytime bike lights are largely a marketing scam. My father smoked two packs a day for about 40 years and did not get lung cancer so that must prove that smoking was not a problem despite all the evidence to the contrary. Like it or not, based on the information given, smoking was NOT a problem for your father. For well over 40 years, riding without daytime lights has never been a problem for me. Today, as on almost every other ride, I can see motorists behind me approaching and if necessary waiting until it's safe to pass. They clearly see me. So do the motorists in front of me. But more significantly, riding without daytime lights hasn't been a problem for millions of cyclists who rode before your flashy toys were invented. People have been riding bikes since the 1880s. There's never been any mass carnage. Take your fear mongering marketing scams elsewhere. Sell your ugly lights to pedestrians. They're at more risk than bicyclists, as the numbers show. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:45:35 -0700, Joerg wrote:
On 2018-10-09 22:35, news18 wrote: On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:02:14 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: I've tried rain pants only once, IIRC. IMO there can't possibly be enough ventilation. But I admit, I know no really comfortable way of riding in the rain. Ride fast enough and dodge the rain drops :-) Use 1: a cape, 2: mudguards and 3: sandals. (Wool soxes/socks if it is cold). Caveat, I made the cape myself. Plenty of ventilation. I've tried the gamit from plastic, coated to fancy breathable gear, but the above was the best set up. YMMV. I second that. Sans the mud guard but the splatter onto my back is muffled by racks and panniers on both bikes. You can always find something to weave into the top of the rack to stop/ reduce that. Hail is a real pain though. Every time I got into that I had forgotten a plastic bag to strap over the helmet. Shower caps are good for that. Either pick one up from Walmart or similar or the free ones from motel/hotel. Just pack it in a side pocket on the handlbar bag or pocket in a pannier. Or place inside the loo roll, which is in a plastic bag anyway. So the hail pebbles piled up in its vent holes, almost giving me a brain freeze. Never had that happen. Long cold descents has to be the closest as we have very few very cold places in Australia. Thankfully. I do have a thin knitted beanie that fits under the cold weatrher helmet(MSR*) to stop brain freeze on really cold times. *MSR (rock) climbing helmets were the first 'bicycle" helmet to meet the then new Australian bicycle helmet regulations. Second was a local canoeing helmet, and the next changes allowed the Bell white mushroom to meet the regs. Fourth was an Australian copy in yellow of the Bell. The MSR was odd in that the padding was two layers of "rubber" which eventually solidified and had all the comfort of a concrete helmet and lead to its retirement. |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:29:55 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 10/10/2018 3:14 PM, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-10 09:19, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 10:54 AM, Joerg wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgybEXkhvHQ "At Exposure, we feel it's as important to use good lights throughout the day, as well as at night." ... um, because we're trying to sell the things, of course! I don't use flash mode on my front lights though. Then you disagree with the source you cited? No. Those bright lights are visible enough in non-flash mode. Speaking of visible enough: My wife and I just returned from a little ride. We rode out to the suburban branch of our credit union to cash a check, then a bit beyond it into sort of semi-rural roads. We returned by different roads. We were on some quiet residential streets, some former farm roads that are now short cuts to housing developments, a bit on an arterial road or two with 50 mph traffic, etc. Quite a few miles were on lanes that were obviously too narrow to share (like 9 feet wide) so we rode at lane center. As usual, we had no problems with any drivers. (Well, except a couple who were clogging things up while they seemed to be looking for entrances to some obscure businesses). And there was absolutely no indication that anyone had any trouble seeing us. Apparently, we were visible enough. Our bikes both had dynamo powered lights, but neither of us had them on. It is all relative to the surroundng conditions. In the past on one of my commutes, i had a heady 12v battery and a 50W whte halogen to the front and a 25 red halogen to the rear simple for the short section of main road through a commercial area full of neon signs, etc. Other dark places, a few 3" reflectors do the job very well and lighting is only to improve your vision and keep plod happy. |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On 2018-10-11 04:57, news18 wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:45:35 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-09 22:35, news18 wrote: On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:02:14 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: I've tried rain pants only once, IIRC. IMO there can't possibly be enough ventilation. But I admit, I know no really comfortable way of riding in the rain. Ride fast enough and dodge the rain drops :-) Use 1: a cape, 2: mudguards and 3: sandals. (Wool soxes/socks if it is cold). Caveat, I made the cape myself. Plenty of ventilation. I've tried the gamit from plastic, coated to fancy breathable gear, but the above was the best set up. YMMV. I second that. Sans the mud guard but the splatter onto my back is muffled by racks and panniers on both bikes. You can always find something to weave into the top of the rack to stop/ reduce that. I have panniers mounted permanently and they have a cross-canvas that catches mud on the road bike. On the MTB there are several panels plus a loading platform, so no splatters either. The problem is the front tire. Some day I might make a custom guard for that. The stuff you can buy for MTB is too floppy. Hail is a real pain though. Every time I got into that I had forgotten a plastic bag to strap over the helmet. Shower caps are good for that. Either pick one up from Walmart or similar or the free ones from motel/hotel. Just pack it in a side pocket on the handlbar bag or pocket in a pannier. Or place inside the loo roll, which is in a plastic bag anyway. I'd sweat profusely plus plastic gives me skin rashes. I usually carry a plastic bag and a rubber band. But you know how it is, looking into the sky, nah, nothing's gonna happen today. And then it does. So the hail pebbles piled up in its vent holes, almost giving me a brain freeze. Never had that happen. Long cold descents has to be the closest as we have very few very cold places in Australia. Thankfully. I do have a thin knitted beanie that fits under the cold weatrher helmet(MSR*) to stop brain freeze on really cold times. *MSR (rock) climbing helmets were the first 'bicycle" helmet to meet the then new Australian bicycle helmet regulations. Second was a local canoeing helmet, and the next changes allowed the Bell white mushroom to meet the regs. Fourth was an Australian copy in yellow of the Bell. I use a standard Bell cycling helmet. The MSR was odd in that the padding was two layers of "rubber" which eventually solidified and had all the comfort of a concrete helmet and lead to its retirement. Ouch. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
SIX thousand and FIVE hundred lumens !!!!!!!!!!
On 2018-10-10 15:17, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 10/10/2018 5:55 PM, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-10 14:29, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 3:14 PM, Joerg wrote: On 2018-10-10 09:19, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 10/10/2018 10:54 AM, Joerg wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgybEXkhvHQ "At Exposure, we feel it's as important to use good lights throughout the day, as well as at night." ... um, because we're trying to sell the things, of course! I don't use flash mode on my front lights though. Then you disagree with the source you cited? No. Those bright lights are visible enough in non-flash mode. Speaking of visible enough: My wife and I just returned from a little ride. We rode out to the suburban branch of our credit union to cash a check, then a bit beyond it into sort of semi-rural roads. We returned by different roads. We were on some quiet residential streets, some former farm roads that are now short cuts to housing developments, a bit on an arterial road or two with 50 mph traffic, etc. Quite a few miles were on lanes that were obviously too narrow to share (like 9 feet wide) so we rode at lane center. As usual, we had no problems with any drivers. (Well, except a couple who were clogging things up while they seemed to be looking for entrances to some obscure businesses). And there was absolutely no indication that anyone had any trouble seeing us. Apparently, we were visible enough. Our bikes both had dynamo powered lights, but neither of us had them on. Some people are not so lucky in the lane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGD5P_LHEHs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abqysSwOcIQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqbbiRxoWR4 You can find videos of almost anything on the web. It's called facts. Two university mates of mine were rear-ended in the lane. One lost a kidney, the other had a ruptured spleen. At least in one case the driver stuck around, something that doesn't appear popular anymore these days. Permission to stick head back into sand granted. [...] -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oculus reaches 3000 lumens | Barry Beams | Techniques | 8 | August 22nd 17 04:21 AM |
How to easily measure lumens | Jeff Liebermann | Techniques | 23 | March 26th 17 10:31 PM |
bye, bye postie, another few thousand less bikes! | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 4 | July 29th 10 10:29 PM |
Worth a thousand words ....probably more | DirtRoadie | Racing | 8 | July 28th 09 07:57 PM |
day fifteen thousand and something | Triball | Unicycling | 0 | October 13th 07 04:27 PM |