A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

spoke gauge/spoke tension relation....



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 5th 05, 10:51 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default spoke gauge/spoke tension relation....

assuming the same hub and rim combination....how much higher would the
spoke tension be if you changed from a 3X with 1.8/2.0mm spokes to
1.5/2.0mm spokes?


on an unrealted note, i recently built another wheels set for a road
bike. the spokes when laced and tensioned, ended up to be about 2mm
too short. if you can imagine the slot in the nipple, for the nipple
driver, the spoke end is about 2mm below this point. i know that only
a portion of the nipple is actually threaded. will this be a problem
at some point?


thanks in advance.

Ads
  #2  
Old January 5th 05, 11:11 PM
Arthur Harris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:

assuming the same hub and rim combination....how much higher would the
spoke tension be if you changed from a 3X with 1.8/2.0mm spokes to
1.5/2.0mm spokes?


The tension should be the same assuming everything is the same except the
spoke gauge.

on an unrealted note, i recently built another wheels set for a road
bike. the spokes when laced and tensioned, ended up to be about 2mm
too short. if you can imagine the slot in the nipple, for the nipple
driver, the spoke end is about 2mm below this point. i know that only
a portion of the nipple is actually threaded. will this be a problem
at some point?


Ideally, the spoke should come to the top of the slot so that you could not
place a screwdriver in the slot. Second best is if the spoke reaches the
bottom of the slot. What you've got is not ideal, but shouldn't be a
problem. I assume you can't see any exposed threads below the nipple.

Art Harris


  #3  
Old January 5th 05, 11:37 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 5 Jan 2005 14:51:00 -0800,
wrote:

assuming the same hub and rim combination....how much higher would the
spoke tension be if you changed from a 3X with 1.8/2.0mm spokes to
1.5/2.0mm spokes?


on an unrealted note, i recently built another wheels set for a road
bike. the spokes when laced and tensioned, ended up to be about 2mm
too short. if you can imagine the slot in the nipple, for the nipple
driver, the spoke end is about 2mm below this point. i know that only
a portion of the nipple is actually threaded. will this be a problem
at some point?


thanks in advance.


Dear TC,

Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't the right spoke
tension (whatever it is) remain the same as long as you had
the same number of spokes in the same cross-three pattern?

That is, the hub and the rim don't care how thick a spoke's
ankles are--they just notice how hard it pulls. To them, a
hundred pounds of tension is a hundred pounds of tension,
whether it's exerted through a motorcycle spoke, a butted 14
gauge DT spoke, or a kevlar string.

The reason for butted spokes is that, given the same
tension, a butted spoke is still strong enough, but more
elastic than a straight spoke. Its thinner mid-section
stretches farther and can therefore contract more as it
passes under the hub, so it doesn't lose all tension as soon
as a straight spoke (a bad thing that involves banging and
rattling). The thick butted ends are intended to leave more
metal at the ends, where fatigue breaks spokes.

As for spokes being 2mm short, that's just cosmetic. The
load is carried by the first few threads where the spoke
enters the nipple, not the whole length of the engagement.

Think of the nipple as a nut and the spoke as a bolt, and
you'll see that the threaded portion of the nipple is much
longer than it needs to be just to hold things together. The
threaded part of the nipple is longer than it needs to
be--the extra length is not for greater strength, but for
easier initial assembly and then for adjusting tension,
which will stretch the spokes slightly.

Carl Fogel
  #4  
Old January 6th 05, 01:31 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nope...no exposed threads below the nipple. thanks to you both. i
just want to be sure.
as for the spoke tension changes....got it. tensions is tension.

  #6  
Old January 6th 05, 02:13 AM
Weisse Luft
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The tension of the spoke needs to be the same, regardless of the gauge.
A wheel is a pretensioned structure who's strength depends on the
initial stress state. Because a butted spoke must be elastically
deformed to a greater extent to achieve the same tension, the wheel
constructed with butted spokes will have greater durability because rim
deformations will result in less spoke tension loss. Racing engines
utilize the same technique when bolt towers are used on the head bolts
since increasing the length of a fastener is analogous to decreasing
the diameter with respect to elasticity.

You need at least 6 turns of engagement on the nipple IF it is brass.
Aluminum nipples NEED to be at the bottom of the slot MINIMUM,
otherwise the nipples will fail.


--
Weisse Luft

  #7  
Old January 6th 05, 06:48 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



You need at least 6 turns of engagement on the nipple IF it is brass.


Aluminum nipples NEED to be at the bottom of the trash can.


6!

dancedancedance. i'll go with it.

on first threads carrying loads-this would seem to be a faith based
concept not a manufacturing reality.

ahaso! on tension, on donner, on galileo-the spokes will twang at a
different pitch, will different twangs produce a different tensions
using the tensionometers?

  #9  
Old January 7th 05, 01:20 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Dart writes:

assuming the same hub and rim combination....how much higher would
the spoke tension be if you changed from a 3X with 1.8/2.0mm spokes
to 1.5/2.0mm spokes?


As was said, tension is tension. Most tensiometers use a
measurement of spoke deflection (bending) when held at two points
and pressure is put on a third between them to represent tension.
Since different gauges of spokes deflect differently under the same
tension, the tensiometer readings are 'calibrated' to compensate for
this. The numerical reading off the tensiometer would be less for
the 1.5 mm spoke than the 1.8 mm spoke given the same tension.


That's the case with currently available tensiometers but the one I
use does not measure across the spoke but rather on one side so
thickness doesn't enter into it and deflections over a four inch span
are nearly identical for 1.6 to 2.0mm diameter spokes. Although the
instrument is shown in "the Bicycle Wheel", manufacturers of these
instruments do not recognize the advantage of unilateral measurement
and require the user to use a lookup table for spoke thicknesses.

Jobst Brandt

  #10  
Old January 22nd 05, 03:06 PM
Qui si parla Campagnolo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

datakoll- the spokes will twang at a
different pitch, will different twangs produce a different tensions
using the tensionometers? BRBR

Yes why tone doesn't tell you tension, just if the spokes are close in tension
to each other...I think ...that's what you asked..

Peter Chisholm
Vecchio's Bicicletteria
1833 Pearl St.
Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535
http://www.vecchios.com
"Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 Mike Iglesias General 4 October 29th 04 07:11 AM
two odd wheel-building techniques [email protected] Techniques 63 August 26th 04 03:08 PM
Wheelbuilding issues Nate Knutson Techniques 13 May 9th 04 03:29 PM
spontaneous detensioning ubersquish Unicycling 32 October 28th 03 05:15 AM
(Un)even spoke tension Ted Bennett Techniques 2 July 17th 03 12:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.