|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Keats" wrote in message
... I've also been drawn into chat that goes on a little too long, by people apparently having mental health issues, on public transit buses. So maybe the guy was just lonely and socially awkward, and needed some human-to-human contact and some charitable regard. If that's the case, you did a good deed. I note you were quite patient and polite with him. God, I hope you're all charitable to me, too, on the road, for the equivalent reasons. -- Warm Regards, Claire Petersky Personal page: http://www.geocities.com/cpetersky/ See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hobby cyclists (long)
Had an interesting commute home Friday afternoon. Being the last day of
exams in this college town, the ride was quieter than usual (fewer than normal beachbound partygoers). It was nice. The ride home (about 10 miles) is along and then off of a dead end road to a lake. About halfway home I heard another cyclist coming up behind me. I moved over to let them pass (it is a popular route for area cyclists). The fellow moved up alongside asking my name, and then proceeded with a string of questions; where do I live, do I like Kelme? , etc. Most of the questions came off with an condescending attitude behind them. "Oh, so you're _just_ commuting?" and when asking where I lived in relation to town, "I guess thats a nice _little_ ride". There were other comments and glances at my late 80's Peugeot that made me feel sorry for the fellow if he was that shallow and such a poor representative of the sport. He had the full setup that looked nice but kind of showy (bike and clothes). I tried to be polite but curt with my answers as I just wanted to enjoy what was left of the ride home (alone) and he'd already hung around too long. Finally getting a clue, he started sprinting off and made a final comment "Well, bud, I hope you don't have a wreck" (emphasis on bud). I knew where this was going but feigned ignorance and let it play out. He quickly added a sarcastic "Without a helmet, a wreck could be ugly." I told him with a smile "With a helmet, a wreck could be ugly too!" It was as true as his statement. He made an attempt at leaving me behind but never got very far ahead. It was kind of amusing considering what I was carrying and his setup. Then, to top it all off, he met 2 other cyclists and a pickup carrying a bike coming the opposite direction in the intersection of my road; proceeding to chat and take up the entire intersection, so much so that myself and then a car behind me had to come to a near stop and go around them in the grass. I just shook my head and it occurred to me that I never had this kind of experience in 25 years as a runner with fellow runners, but more than a few similar experiences cycling. I did an 8 mile run when I got home down to the wildlife refuge for some peace and quiet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Dukester" wrote in message
... (long snip) Sounds like you're the one who had an attitude and a high-and-mighty opinion of yourself. Seemed to me that he just wanted to be friendly and you put up a wall. It also sounds like you're defensive about whatever it is you've done to convince yourself you wouldn't be better off wearing a helmet. Try lightening up. -- Bob C. "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts." T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with the OP. There is a lot of snobbery in the sport. I just
picked it up last year. I've noticed that it's analagous to B-ball players talking about their skills, but bicyclists (if snobby) tend to boast about equipment. The nail in the coffin? "Bud." IMHO, the word "Bud" is like a finger in my chest. I ain't your bud. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Dukester" wrote in message ... "Oh, so you're _just_ commuting?" For me, comparison of annual mileage usually shuts that one down pretty fast. RichC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
psycholist wrote:
"Dukester" wrote in message ... (long snip) Sounds like you're the one who had an attitude and a high-and-mighty opinion of yourself. Seemed to me that he just wanted to be friendly and you put up a wall. It also sounds like you're defensive about whatever it is you've done to convince yourself you wouldn't be better off wearing a helmet. Try lightening up. OK, your reply got me to read the OP (I must have missed or ignored it). I agree with Bob; something doesn't add up. If the other guy was truly a snooty, elitist cyclist, he wouldn't have even acknowledged The Dukester's (lol) existence. Sounds like he was just trying to be friendly. (Although I DO agree that unsolicited "helmet preaching" is uncalled for. Maybe it resulted FROM the OP's cold shoulder attitude?) Apparently the ol' Dukester is happier on his solo 8-mile runs than chatting with a fellow cyclist for a few minutes. Whatever. Bill S. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
bryanska wrote:
I agree with the OP. There is a lot of snobbery in the sport. I just picked it up last year. I've noticed that it's analagous to B-ball players talking about their skills, but bicyclists (if snobby) tend to boast about equipment. The nail in the coffin? "Bud." IMHO, the word "Bud" is like a finger in my chest. I ain't your bud. But...but...Fabrizio would never even GLANCE at the OP! Something is inconsistent here, Bud. :-D |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Dukester" writes: The fellow moved up alongside asking my name, and then proceeded with a string of questions; where do I live, do I like Kelme? , etc. Most of the questions came off with an condescending attitude behind them. "Oh, so you're _just_ commuting?" and when asking where I lived in relation to town, "I guess thats a nice _little_ ride". Maybe you were investigated by some intelligence service agent. Or a wannabe. I don't mind brief little small-talk conversations with other riders, but this guy sure was a busybody. I've also been drawn into chat that goes on a little too long, by people apparently having mental health issues, on public transit buses. So maybe the guy was just lonely and socially awkward, and needed some human-to-human contact and some charitable regard. If that's the case, you did a good deed. I note you were quite patient and polite with him. cheers, Tom -- -- Nothing is safe from me. Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
LOL... "Fabrizio"
I'm makin' that my word of the day. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
... If the other guy was truly a snooty, elitist cyclist, he wouldn't have even acknowledged The Dukester's (lol) existence. Sounds like he was just trying to be friendly. (Although I DO agree that unsolicited "helmet preaching" is uncalled for. Maybe it resulted FROM the OP's cold shoulder attitude?) Apparently the ol' Dukester is happier on his solo 8-mile runs than chatting with a fellow cyclist for a few minutes. Well, yes, I am happier on those runs if your definition of chatting to be him giving the once over type look while making remarks like it was cute that I rode to work. I stand by the assertion that they were made condescendingly, and it wouldn't have taken a genius in human behavior to figure that out at the time. The fact that him and his "buds" didn't mind blocking an intersection while they were chatting should speak for itself. Cheers! Duke |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Long] ASA vs CTC | Not Responding | UK | 18 | January 20th 05 01:36 AM |
The best way to improve safety for cyclists in a city... | Paul R | Social Issues | 43 | November 23rd 04 11:14 PM |
Critical Mass: Peaceful Cyclists to Reclaim City Streets | TIME'S UP! (via Jym Dyer) | Social Issues | 0 | September 24th 04 05:10 AM |
Mail on Sunday | andy w | UK | 92 | October 27th 03 01:42 PM |
Dr. Gridlock and Cycling (LONG) | Luigi de Guzman | General | 6 | September 3rd 03 11:17 AM |