#31
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On 04-Jul-16 6:15 PM, Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 5:53:16 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: I give drivers a quick thank you for stopping, I have yet to be ignored when stood at a zebra crossing. Thank you for proving my point. What point is that, that motorists stop at crossings? It's called common courtesy, something you as a dedicated scum cyclist will never understand. How childish. So being polite is childish, what a quaint idea. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On Monday, 4 July 2016 20:30:15 UTC+1, James Wilkinson wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:44:09 +0100, Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 18:31:20 UTC+1, Simon Jester wrote: The point is you are stood at a zebra crossing waiting for permission from a motorist to cross. You have priority and should not be in fear for your life for exercising that priority. Indeed - if I am at a zebra and a car is approaching, but has plenty of time to stop if I walk out, then I will simply walk across there and then. This saves time in the same way as when I drive on when three cars turn up at a mini roundabout - I make the other parties' mind up for them which then negates any "after you" dithering. If you did that in front of me you'd get hooted at. You should at least wait to see if the car is slowing. One day you're going to get run over. Been doing it for 40 years now - not so much as a feeble parp parp yet. Better for a driver than in out in out shake it all about. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
Alycidon wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 20:30:15 UTC+1, James Wilkinson wrote: On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:44:09 +0100, Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 18:31:20 UTC+1, Simon Jester wrote: The point is you are stood at a zebra crossing waiting for permission from a motorist to cross. You have priority and should not be in fear for your life for exercising that priority. Indeed - if I am at a zebra and a car is approaching, but has plenty of time to stop if I walk out, then I will simply walk across there and then. This saves time in the same way as when I drive on when three cars turn up at a mini roundabout - I make the other parties' mind up for them which then negates any "after you" dithering. If you did that in front of me you'd get hooted at. You should at least wait to see if the car is slowing. One day you're going to get run over. Been doing it for 40 years now - not so much as a feeble parp parp yet. Better for a driver than in out in out shake it all about. Any driver who sounds his horn because a pedestrian crosses at a zebra crossing, should wake up after an eighteen-year coma. -- john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons) 'It never gets any easier. You just get faster' (Greg LeMond (1961 - )) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:12:32 +0100, Alycidon wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 20:30:15 UTC+1, James Wilkinson wrote: On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:44:09 +0100, Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 18:31:20 UTC+1, Simon Jester wrote: The point is you are stood at a zebra crossing waiting for permission from a motorist to cross. You have priority and should not be in fear for your life for exercising that priority. Indeed - if I am at a zebra and a car is approaching, but has plenty of time to stop if I walk out, then I will simply walk across there and then. This saves time in the same way as when I drive on when three cars turn up at a mini roundabout - I make the other parties' mind up for them which then negates any "after you" dithering. If you did that in front of me you'd get hooted at. You should at least wait to see if the car is slowing. One day you're going to get run over. Been doing it for 40 years now - not so much as a feeble parp parp yet. Better for a driver than in out in out shake it all about. There's a very simple way to cross a zebra. You turn to face across the road so drivers know you want to cross. You watch the car approaching you [1], and when you see it slowing down for you, you cross. I've got to part [1] before, and the car made no attempt to stop. Doing what you do could cause an accident. -- A sign at the golf course detailing the dress code: Guys: No Shirts, No Golf Girls: No Shirts, No Green Fees |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:26:37 +0100, Bruce 'Not Glug' Lee wrote:
Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 20:30:15 UTC+1, James Wilkinson wrote: On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:44:09 +0100, Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 18:31:20 UTC+1, Simon Jester wrote: The point is you are stood at a zebra crossing waiting for permission from a motorist to cross. You have priority and should not be in fear for your life for exercising that priority. Indeed - if I am at a zebra and a car is approaching, but has plenty of time to stop if I walk out, then I will simply walk across there and then. This saves time in the same way as when I drive on when three cars turn up at a mini roundabout - I make the other parties' mind up for them which then negates any "after you" dithering. If you did that in front of me you'd get hooted at. You should at least wait to see if the car is slowing. One day you're going to get run over. Been doing it for 40 years now - not so much as a feeble parp parp yet. Better for a driver than in out in out shake it all about. Any driver who sounds his horn because a pedestrian crosses at a zebra crossing, should wake up after an eighteen-year coma. More likely the stupid pedestrian gets a coma for walking in front of a tonne of fast moving steel. You're only in the right until you get splatted, then you aren't anything. -- A foursome of ladies was standing on a tee when a streaker ran across the fairway in front of them. One lady asks, "Is that Dick Green?" Another replied, "No, I think it's just the reflection off the grass." |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On Monday, 4 July 2016 21:28:56 UTC+1, James Wilkinson wrote:
Been doing it for 40 years now - not so much as a feeble parp parp yet. Better for a driver than in out in out shake it all about. There's a very simple way to cross a zebra. You turn to face across the road so drivers know you want to cross. You watch the car approaching you [1], and when you see it slowing down for you, you cross. I've got to part [1] before, and the car made no attempt to stop. Doing what you do could cause an accident. It can't be an "accident" if the driver had twice the stopping distance when I start to walk across the zebra in order to come to a halt in good time. If he wants to play chicken he will end up in court when the film is played back in court. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:56:20 +0100, Alycidon wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 21:28:56 UTC+1, James Wilkinson wrote: Been doing it for 40 years now - not so much as a feeble parp parp yet. Better for a driver than in out in out shake it all about. There's a very simple way to cross a zebra. You turn to face across the road so drivers know you want to cross. You watch the car approaching you [1], and when you see it slowing down for you, you cross. I've got to part [1] before, and the car made no attempt to stop. Doing what you do could cause an accident. It can't be an "accident" if the driver had twice the stopping distance when I start to walk across the zebra in order to come to a halt in good time. You're assuming he saw the fool walking across the road without waiting for it to be safe. If he wants to play chicken That's precisely what you were doing. he will end up in court when the film What film? If you carry a video camera around as a pedestrian, you're an even bigger sad loser than I previously thought. is played back in court. And you'll be dead or in hospital. You lose. -- TEACHER: Why are you late? STUDENT: Class started before I got here. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On 04/07/2016 21:28, James Wilkinson wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:12:32 +0100, Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 20:30:15 UTC+1, James Wilkinson wrote: On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:44:09 +0100, Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 18:31:20 UTC+1, Simon Jester wrote: The point is you are stood at a zebra crossing waiting for permission from a motorist to cross. You have priority and should not be in fear for your life for exercising that priority. Indeed - if I am at a zebra and a car is approaching, but has plenty of time to stop if I walk out, then I will simply walk across there and then. This saves time in the same way as when I drive on when three cars turn up at a mini roundabout - I make the other parties' mind up for them which then negates any "after you" dithering. If you did that in front of me you'd get hooted at. You should at least wait to see if the car is slowing. One day you're going to get run over. Been doing it for 40 years now - not so much as a feeble parp parp yet. Better for a driver than in out in out shake it all about. There's a very simple way to cross a zebra. You turn to face across the road so drivers know you want to cross. You watch the car approaching you [1], and when you see it slowing down for you, you cross. It is possible to plan for eventualities and adapt to situations as they arise. It only takes two seconds to cross the footprint of a car, after all. But people mind less if you get on with it and don't stand there dithering. I've got to part [1] before, and the car made no attempt to stop. Doing what you do could cause an accident. Depends on whether they were within the zig zags as you started to cross. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:58:34 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2016 21:28, James Wilkinson wrote: On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:12:32 +0100, Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 20:30:15 UTC+1, James Wilkinson wrote: On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:44:09 +0100, Alycidon wrote: On Monday, 4 July 2016 18:31:20 UTC+1, Simon Jester wrote: The point is you are stood at a zebra crossing waiting for permission from a motorist to cross. You have priority and should not be in fear for your life for exercising that priority. Indeed - if I am at a zebra and a car is approaching, but has plenty of time to stop if I walk out, then I will simply walk across there and then. This saves time in the same way as when I drive on when three cars turn up at a mini roundabout - I make the other parties' mind up for them which then negates any "after you" dithering. If you did that in front of me you'd get hooted at. You should at least wait to see if the car is slowing. One day you're going to get run over. Been doing it for 40 years now - not so much as a feeble parp parp yet. Better for a driver than in out in out shake it all about. There's a very simple way to cross a zebra. You turn to face across the road so drivers know you want to cross. You watch the car approaching you [1], and when you see it slowing down for you, you cross. It is possible to plan for eventualities and adapt to situations as they arise. It only takes two seconds to cross the footprint of a car, after all. But people mind less if you get on with it and don't stand there dithering. Crossing in front of a car which wasn't going to stop either means you have to run for your life, or the car has to stop more rapidly than it should be doing and possibly lose control. I've got to part [1] before, and the car made no attempt to stop. Doing what you do could cause an accident. Depends on whether they were within the zig zags as you started to cross. Like either of us would check something like that, instead of concentrating on the more important thing of avoiding being in the same place as someone else at the same time. And I've never heard of zigzags meaning anything of the sort. You're supposed to "stop if safe to do so" - that's not an emergency stop. The only thing the zigzags mean is no parking, because apparently pedestrians are too dumb to be able to look round a parked car. -- Why do tourists go to the top of tall buildings and then put money in telescopes so they can see things on the ground in close-up? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Why do pedestrians
On 04/07/2016 20:28, James Wilkinson wrote:
JNugent wrote: On 04/07/2016 17:46, soup wrote: On 04/07/2016 17:37, Simon Jester wrote: Why do pedestrians thank drivers with a wave for stopping at zebra crossings? Probably for the same reasons as drivers thank each other with waves when one stops as the other has right of way. I frequently wave at cars that give me plenty room overtaking me, cars that wait at side roads etc etc. You may say they are just not 'breaking the law' but to me politeness costs nothing and any situation where drivers do that extra little bit of actually acknowledging you exist and treat you as other traffic deserves my thanks/acknowledgment It really IS amazing that some people are so consumed with bitterness and spite that they simply cannot comprehend unforced politeness, isn't it? Actually, I can't remember ever seeing a cyclist wave. I have seen it happen. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do pedestrians always have the right of way? | Gus | Techniques | 8 | August 5th 13 05:06 AM |
More pedestrians complaining just because they think the pavement isfor pedestrians | Marie | UK | 25 | January 9th 12 01:33 AM |
Damn Pedestrians! | Sofa Slug | Recumbent Biking | 1 | March 20th 11 01:20 PM |
Pedestrians are fed up with motorists too | SW[_3_] | UK | 3 | November 29th 10 10:15 AM |
Pedestrians |
Badger South | General | 57 | October 9th 03 03:25 AM |