A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fundamental error in "Trends in serious head injuries..." Cook andSheikh 2003Fundamental error in "Trends in serious head injuries..." Cookand Sheikh 2003



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 13th 04, 10:26 AM
Just zis Guy, you know?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fundamental error in "Trends in serious head injuries..." Cook and Sheikh 2003Fundamental error in "Trends in serious head injuries..."Cook and Sheikh 2003

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:52:21 +0900, James Annan
wrote in message
:

AIUI, at least one has been sent (not by me), pointing out the shaky
foundations of their research (including, but not limited to, this
error). Not that the press will be interested, of course.


By whom? Malcolm's latest rebuttal is of the same paper as yours.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University
Ads
  #12  
Old June 13th 04, 10:45 AM
James Annan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fundamental error in "Trends in serious head injuries..." Cookand Sheikh 2003Fundamental error in "Trends in serious head injuries..."Cookand Sheikh 2003

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:52:21 +0900, James Annan
wrote in message
:


AIUI, at least one has been sent (not by me), pointing out the shaky
foundations of their research (including, but not limited to, this
error). Not that the press will be interested, of course.



By whom? Malcolm's latest rebuttal is of the same paper as yours.


No, it (unless you are talking about something else again) is actually
sent to JRSM in reply to Sheikh's "Unethical arguments" paper which
appeared in that journal. Which, since it leans substantially on this
incorrect analysis, is equally undermined by the error (and weak for a
number of other reasons too).

James

  #13  
Old June 13th 04, 11:14 AM
Just zis Guy, you know?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fundamental error in "Trends in serious head injuries..." Cook and Sheikh 2003Fundamental error in "Trends in serious head injuries..."Cook and Sheikh 2003

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:45:20 +0900, James Annan
wrote in message
:

By whom? Malcolm's latest rebuttal is of the same paper as yours.


No, it (unless you are talking about something else again) is actually
sent to JRSM in reply to Sheikh's "Unethical arguments" paper which
appeared in that journal.


I may be looking at a different draft from Malcolm.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gels vs Gatorade Ken Techniques 145 August 3rd 04 06:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.