JUstice?

On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 4:54:40 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:29:42 +0200, Rolf Mantel
wrote:

Am 12.10.2020 um 16:57 schrieb Tom Kunich:
What would you think if your wife had decided that your son was inconvenient?

In those countries where such a decision is possible, it is typical that
if the two persons involved in producing offspring together are on
talking terms, they talk about grave matters like this, and it would not
be "his wife deciding it was inconvenient".

The only reasons for abortion inside a married relationship that occurs
in any significant quantities are
Grave danger for the mother's life and
Severe diability of the fetus
Having lived in several countries where abortion is accepted and I
think, at least from cases I know the details of, abortions seem most
prevalent among young unmarried women. Perhaps it is because in Asia,
where I have lived for the majority of my adult life large families
are not despaired of. Another point is that as abortions are not
condemned they seem to be first two or three months of pregnancy when,
I understand, they are less threatening to the woman's health.

Another point, in the families with which we are related or friendly
enough so that my wife is likely to know the intimate details of the
family - women do talk to each other, about all sorts of things - it
seems that modern day families tend to have two kids, without the help
of abortions so apparently birth control aids are commonly available
and commonly used.

Amy Barrett has NEVER ruled on a case that considers abortion. What's more, in order for her to do so on the Supreme Court someone has to have a case strong enough to be brought before the Supreme Court. This is so difficult that it could be more than two decades. That is highly unlikely since virtually every argument against Row v. Wade has been attempted and failed.

On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 5:01:53 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 3:30:12 PM UTC+1, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 12:05:01 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 2:48:32 AM UTC+1, AMuzi wrote:

I mentioned several egregious (and never reversed) examples

What the Donkey Party fears about Professor Barrett, soon Associate Justice Barrett, is that she will not respect precedents in wrongly decided cases, particularly the enabling judge-made legislation, Roe v Wade (1), of a monstrous campaign of infanticide in the USA, 61 million unborn babies killed since Roe v Wade was decided in 1973, an average of 1.3m licensed murders a year, mostly of black children in a hangover from the eugenics which was the favoured social policy of the Left in the USA until Hitler's shenanigans discredited it, after which it went underground as Planned Parenthood.

(1) Hell, let's not call Roe v Wade "judge-made legislation", which a dingbat like Jay will soon tell us in his prissy way is impossible in the USA under the Constitution (to which I agree -- that's why the many instances of the "impossible" should be reversed before Mr Trump hands over the White House to Mr Pence in January 2025), let's name it for what it really is, the cornerstone of a loudly faithful cult of devil worshippers organised as the Democrat Party, with the million-plus murdered foetuses every year as their offering to their horned master. It's only one of a parade of evil deeds that make the members of the Donkey Party the true racists in America..

I will tell you in my prissy way that you're a dope
Why, thank you, Jay. I always wanted to be a stand-up comic but it turned out I didn't have the common touch, in your terms, I wasn't dopey enough. Nice to know you're still capable of sympathy.
and should confine yourself to judging warm beer at your local pub
Maybe not in my local pub, but in my days as an advertising agency troubleshooter I was leant to a distinguished brewery group one of our clients had just bought a share of, and there I took one mouthful of their beer, spat it out on the floor and ordered a hundred thousand gallons of it run into the sewers, before designing for them what is still the world's largest-premium beer, probably in your fridge too, though not in mine as I don't drink beer.
-- or based on your latest post, judging psilocybin mushrooms from your local woods.
Nope, when I go mushroom gathering I take a leading expert who lives down the road with me to identify and approve of each mushroom before I pick it.. I don't even know what psilocybin mushrooms are and can't be bothered to look it up as I'm apparently less interested in drugs than you are.
You clearly don't understand the role of US judges or justices in interpreting the 14th Amendment,
That a junior high school (and not a very good school either) argument to tell me I don't understand something, thereby to imply that you do, and then not to offer to explain. It make you look stupid for not knowing that I would catch on and expose your cheap trick.
which is not surprising coming from a country with no written constitution
Everyone who grasps how the senior anglophone democracies, and latterly the EU, works, knows we have a constitution and that it is indeed written down in Strasbourg or Brussels or somewhere. I haven't asked where because there are no shysters quibbling about it.
-- and where abortion is both legal
Yup. We have our own pinko-commie-fellow-traveller dimbos and hoes, and they all have a vote, just like people. The good people foolishly let that one slip by staying home on the since disproven assumption that no one would vote for abortion. (Me too. I should have bestirred myself and my neighbours to go vote.)

and free.

Try collecting on that promise if you aren't actually indigent! Man, you should keep your nose out of what you clearly don't understand. Your view of socialised medicine in Ireland is one huge cliche of outright errors, leading you by erroneous assumption into stupid remarks like that one. The Health Service in Ireland has only superficial points of resemblance to the one in the UK; as a consequence is it noticeably more efficient.

-- Jay Beattie.

Always glad to hear from you, Jay. Tell us, are you so sour and prissy because you fear that Mr Trump will be reelected, or because you know that if Mr Biden is elected, the next day we will ask you, "What the have you done to your country?" -- and you will have no answer?

Psilocybin mushrooms are pretty clearly something that Jay has had great experience with since he continually is off on a "trip" bragging on how he has paid the legally required Social Security and Medicare funds for his employees as if he had a choice. He also decided that although he is considerably younger than I am he has paid more quarters of social security than I did. This despite my saying that I once calculated that I would be 92 years old before I broke even with Social Security.

On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 11:14:35 PM UTC-7, Tosspot wrote:

Didn't see Donald complaining when he jacked up on aborted fetus juice.
Anyway, how many ****ing amendments do you need!?
It always surprises me that people like you haven't even a clue of how the US government works. Somehow you believe that the country is run willy nilly by the President and not the Congress which is elected to make the laws.

On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 9:39:49 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 4:54:40 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:29:42 +0200, Rolf Mantel
wrote:

Am 12.10.2020 um 16:57 schrieb Tom Kunich:
What would you think if your wife had decided that your son was inconvenient?

In those countries where such a decision is possible, it is typical that
if the two persons involved in producing offspring together are on
talking terms, they talk about grave matters like this, and it would not
be "his wife deciding it was inconvenient".

The only reasons for abortion inside a married relationship that occurs
in any significant quantities are
Grave danger for the mother's life and
Severe diability of the fetus
Having lived in several countries where abortion is accepted and I
think, at least from cases I know the details of, abortions seem most
prevalent among young unmarried women. Perhaps it is because in Asia,
where I have lived for the majority of my adult life large families
are not despaired of. Another point is that as abortions are not
condemned they seem to be first two or three months of pregnancy when,
I understand, they are less threatening to the woman's health.

Another point, in the families with which we are related or friendly
enough so that my wife is likely to know the intimate details of the
family - women do talk to each other, about all sorts of things - it
seems that modern day families tend to have two kids, without the help
of abortions so apparently birth control aids are commonly available
and commonly used.

Amy Barrett has NEVER ruled on a case that considers abortion. What's more, in order for her to do so on the Supreme Court someone has to have a case strong enough to be brought before the Supreme Court. This is so difficult that it could be more than two decades. That is highly unlikely since virtually every argument against Row v. Wade has been attempted and failed.

WAKE UP! https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/07/p...ents-and-more/ There's an abortion cert petition on the f****** docket. These cases are common as fleas during the Trump administration, particularly out of the deep-fried Fifth Circuit.

First cut on the cert petitions is done by Alito and Gorsuch's clerks. Hmmmm. Memo goes to the whole court. It is likely the court will hear a challenge to Roe v. Wade this term.

Thank you for your incredible insight into the workings of the US Supreme Court without even looking at the docket. Have you even been to the book store?

-- Jay Beattie.

On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 9:46:29 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 5:01:53 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 3:30:12 PM UTC+1, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 12:05:01 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 2:48:32 AM UTC+1, AMuzi wrote:

I mentioned several egregious (and never reversed) examples

What the Donkey Party fears about Professor Barrett, soon Associate Justice Barrett, is that she will not respect precedents in wrongly decided cases, particularly the enabling judge-made legislation, Roe v Wade (1), of a monstrous campaign of infanticide in the USA, 61 million unborn babies killed since Roe v Wade was decided in 1973, an average of 1.3m licensed murders a year, mostly of black children in a hangover from the eugenics which was the favoured social policy of the Left in the USA until Hitler's shenanigans discredited it, after which it went underground as Planned Parenthood.

(1) Hell, let's not call Roe v Wade "judge-made legislation", which a dingbat like Jay will soon tell us in his prissy way is impossible in the USA under the Constitution (to which I agree -- that's why the many instances of the "impossible" should be reversed before Mr Trump hands over the White House to Mr Pence in January 2025), let's name it for what it really is, the cornerstone of a loudly faithful cult of devil worshippers organised as the Democrat Party, with the million-plus murdered foetuses every year as their offering to their horned master. It's only one of a parade of evil deeds that make the members of the Donkey Party the true racists in America.

I will tell you in my prissy way that you're a dope
Why, thank you, Jay. I always wanted to be a stand-up comic but it turned out I didn't have the common touch, in your terms, I wasn't dopey enough.. Nice to know you're still capable of sympathy.
and should confine yourself to judging warm beer at your local pub
Maybe not in my local pub, but in my days as an advertising agency troubleshooter I was leant to a distinguished brewery group one of our clients had just bought a share of, and there I took one mouthful of their beer, spat it out on the floor and ordered a hundred thousand gallons of it run into the sewers, before designing for them what is still the world's largest-premium beer, probably in your fridge too, though not in mine as I don't drink beer.
-- or based on your latest post, judging psilocybin mushrooms from your local woods.
Nope, when I go mushroom gathering I take a leading expert who lives down the road with me to identify and approve of each mushroom before I pick it. I don't even know what psilocybin mushrooms are and can't be bothered to look it up as I'm apparently less interested in drugs than you are.
You clearly don't understand the role of US judges or justices in interpreting the 14th Amendment,
That a junior high school (and not a very good school either) argument to tell me I don't understand something, thereby to imply that you do, and then not to offer to explain. It make you look stupid for not knowing that I would catch on and expose your cheap trick.
which is not surprising coming from a country with no written constitution
Everyone who grasps how the senior anglophone democracies, and latterly the EU, works, knows we have a constitution and that it is indeed written down in Strasbourg or Brussels or somewhere. I haven't asked where because there are no shysters quibbling about it.
-- and where abortion is both legal
Yup. We have our own pinko-commie-fellow-traveller dimbos and hoes, and they all have a vote, just like people. The good people foolishly let that one slip by staying home on the since disproven assumption that no one would vote for abortion. (Me too. I should have bestirred myself and my neighbours to go vote.)

and free.

Try collecting on that promise if you aren't actually indigent! Man, you should keep your nose out of what you clearly don't understand. Your view of socialised medicine in Ireland is one huge cliche of outright errors, leading you by erroneous assumption into stupid remarks like that one. The Health Service in Ireland has only superficial points of resemblance to the one in the UK; as a consequence is it noticeably more efficient.

-- Jay Beattie.

Always glad to hear from you, Jay. Tell us, are you so sour and prissy because you fear that Mr Trump will be reelected, or because you know that if Mr Biden is elected, the next day we will ask you, "What the have you done to your country?" -- and you will have no answer?

Psilocybin mushrooms are pretty clearly something that Jay has had great experience with since he continually is off on a "trip" bragging on how he has paid the legally required Social Security and Medicare funds for his employees as if he had a choice. He also decided that although he is considerably younger than I am he has paid more quarters of social security than I did. This despite my saying that I once calculated that I would be 92 years old before I broke even with Social Security.

At least I'm not jacked up on Haldol or whatever anti-psychotic you're on. My point was that I'm supporting you. I have put far more into the SS trust than you. I pay the employer's side for a fleet of employees and both sides for myself. My dollar contributions dwarf yours -- and you're sucking the trust dry. Tom the ubermensch SS welfare queen. Current contributors to Socialist Security are supporting you, comrade. Embrace socialism.

-- Jay Beattie.

On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 10:18:49 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 9:39:49 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 4:54:40 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:29:42 +0200, Rolf Mantel
wrote:

Am 12.10.2020 um 16:57 schrieb Tom Kunich:
What would you think if your wife had decided that your son was inconvenient?

In those countries where such a decision is possible, it is typical that
if the two persons involved in producing offspring together are on
talking terms, they talk about grave matters like this, and it would not
be "his wife deciding it was inconvenient".

The only reasons for abortion inside a married relationship that occurs
in any significant quantities are
Grave danger for the mother's life and
Severe diability of the fetus
Having lived in several countries where abortion is accepted and I
think, at least from cases I know the details of, abortions seem most
prevalent among young unmarried women. Perhaps it is because in Asia,
where I have lived for the majority of my adult life large families
are not despaired of. Another point is that as abortions are not
condemned they seem to be first two or three months of pregnancy when,
I understand, they are less threatening to the woman's health.

Another point, in the families with which we are related or friendly
enough so that my wife is likely to know the intimate details of the
family - women do talk to each other, about all sorts of things - it
seems that modern day families tend to have two kids, without the help
of abortions so apparently birth control aids are commonly available
and commonly used.

Amy Barrett has NEVER ruled on a case that considers abortion. What's more, in order for her to do so on the Supreme Court someone has to have a case strong enough to be brought before the Supreme Court. This is so difficult that it could be more than two decades. That is highly unlikely since virtually every argument against Row v. Wade has been attempted and failed.
WAKE UP! https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/07/p...ents-and-more/ There's an abortion cert petition on the f****** docket. These cases are common as fleas during the Trump administration, particularly out of the deep-fried Fifth Circuit.

First cut on the cert petitions is done by Alito and Gorsuch's clerks. Hmmmm. Memo goes to the whole court. It is likely the court will hear a challenge to Roe v. Wade this term.

Thank you for your incredible insight into the workings of the US Supreme Court without even looking at the docket. Have you even been to the book store?

If you haven't even bothered to actually look at what that case is why don't you stop talking ****?

On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 10:28:12 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 9:46:29 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 5:01:53 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 3:30:12 PM UTC+1, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 12:05:01 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 2:48:32 AM UTC+1, AMuzi wrote:

I mentioned several egregious (and never reversed) examples

What the Donkey Party fears about Professor Barrett, soon Associate Justice Barrett, is that she will not respect precedents in wrongly decided cases, particularly the enabling judge-made legislation, Roe v Wade (1), of a monstrous campaign of infanticide in the USA, 61 million unborn babies killed since Roe v Wade was decided in 1973, an average of 1.3m licensed murders a year, mostly of black children in a hangover from the eugenics which was the favoured social policy of the Left in the USA until Hitler's shenanigans discredited it, after which it went underground as Planned Parenthood.

(1) Hell, let's not call Roe v Wade "judge-made legislation", which a dingbat like Jay will soon tell us in his prissy way is impossible in the USA under the Constitution (to which I agree -- that's why the many instances of the "impossible" should be reversed before Mr Trump hands over the White House to Mr Pence in January 2025), let's name it for what it really is, the cornerstone of a loudly faithful cult of devil worshippers organised as the Democrat Party, with the million-plus murdered foetuses every year as their offering to their horned master. It's only one of a parade of evil deeds that make the members of the Donkey Party the true racists in America.

I will tell you in my prissy way that you're a dope
Why, thank you, Jay. I always wanted to be a stand-up comic but it turned out I didn't have the common touch, in your terms, I wasn't dopey enough. Nice to know you're still capable of sympathy.
and should confine yourself to judging warm beer at your local pub
Maybe not in my local pub, but in my days as an advertising agency troubleshooter I was leant to a distinguished brewery group one of our clients had just bought a share of, and there I took one mouthful of their beer, spat it out on the floor and ordered a hundred thousand gallons of it run into the sewers, before designing for them what is still the world's largest-premium beer, probably in your fridge too, though not in mine as I don't drink beer.
-- or based on your latest post, judging psilocybin mushrooms from your local woods.
Nope, when I go mushroom gathering I take a leading expert who lives down the road with me to identify and approve of each mushroom before I pick it. I don't even know what psilocybin mushrooms are and can't be bothered to look it up as I'm apparently less interested in drugs than you are.
You clearly don't understand the role of US judges or justices in interpreting the 14th Amendment,
That a junior high school (and not a very good school either) argument to tell me I don't understand something, thereby to imply that you do, and then not to offer to explain. It make you look stupid for not knowing that I would catch on and expose your cheap trick.
which is not surprising coming from a country with no written constitution
Everyone who grasps how the senior anglophone democracies, and latterly the EU, works, knows we have a constitution and that it is indeed written down in Strasbourg or Brussels or somewhere. I haven't asked where because there are no shysters quibbling about it.
-- and where abortion is both legal
Yup. We have our own pinko-commie-fellow-traveller dimbos and hoes, and they all have a vote, just like people. The good people foolishly let that one slip by staying home on the since disproven assumption that no one would vote for abortion. (Me too. I should have bestirred myself and my neighbours to go vote.)

and free.

Try collecting on that promise if you aren't actually indigent! Man, you should keep your nose out of what you clearly don't understand. Your view of socialised medicine in Ireland is one huge cliche of outright errors, leading you by erroneous assumption into stupid remarks like that one. The Health Service in Ireland has only superficial points of resemblance to the one in the UK; as a consequence is it noticeably more efficient.

-- Jay Beattie.

Always glad to hear from you, Jay. Tell us, are you so sour and prissy because you fear that Mr Trump will be reelected, or because you know that if Mr Biden is elected, the next day we will ask you, "What the have you done to your country?" -- and you will have no answer?

Psilocybin mushrooms are pretty clearly something that Jay has had great experience with since he continually is off on a "trip" bragging on how he has paid the legally required Social Security and Medicare funds for his employees as if he had a choice. He also decided that although he is considerably younger than I am he has paid more quarters of social security than I did. This despite my saying that I once calculated that I would be 92 years old before I broke even with Social Security.
At least I'm not jacked up on Haldol or whatever anti-psychotic you're on.. My point was that I'm supporting you. I have put far more into the SS trust than you. I pay the employer's side for a fleet of employees and both sides for myself. My dollar contributions dwarf yours -- and you're sucking the trust dry. Tom the ubermensch SS welfare queen. Current contributors to Socialist Security are supporting you, comrade. Embrace socialism.

Again with the ****. What you are required to pay for your employees DOES NOT COUNT as you paying into your own SS. You are paying for nothing and bragging about it. I have to admit that the psychotic comments from you are entertaining even through they are all screwed up.

On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 10:44:17 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 10:28:12 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 9:46:29 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 5:01:53 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 3:30:12 PM UTC+1, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 12:05:01 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 2:48:32 AM UTC+1, AMuzi wrote:

I mentioned several egregious (and never reversed) examples

What the Donkey Party fears about Professor Barrett, soon Associate Justice Barrett, is that she will not respect precedents in wrongly decided cases, particularly the enabling judge-made legislation, Roe v Wade (1), of a monstrous campaign of infanticide in the USA, 61 million unborn babies killed since Roe v Wade was decided in 1973, an average of 1.3m licensed murders a year, mostly of black children in a hangover from the eugenics which was the favoured social policy of the Left in the USA until Hitler's shenanigans discredited it, after which it went underground as Planned Parenthood.

(1) Hell, let's not call Roe v Wade "judge-made legislation", which a dingbat like Jay will soon tell us in his prissy way is impossible in the USA under the Constitution (to which I agree -- that's why the many instances of the "impossible" should be reversed before Mr Trump hands over the White House to Mr Pence in January 2025), let's name it for what it really is, the cornerstone of a loudly faithful cult of devil worshippers organised as the Democrat Party, with the million-plus murdered foetuses every year as their offering to their horned master. It's only one of a parade of evil deeds that make the members of the Donkey Party the true racists in America.

I will tell you in my prissy way that you're a dope
Why, thank you, Jay. I always wanted to be a stand-up comic but it turned out I didn't have the common touch, in your terms, I wasn't dopey enough. Nice to know you're still capable of sympathy.
and should confine yourself to judging warm beer at your local pub
Maybe not in my local pub, but in my days as an advertising agency troubleshooter I was leant to a distinguished brewery group one of our clients had just bought a share of, and there I took one mouthful of their beer, spat it out on the floor and ordered a hundred thousand gallons of it run into the sewers, before designing for them what is still the world's largest-premium beer, probably in your fridge too, though not in mine as I don't drink beer.
-- or based on your latest post, judging psilocybin mushrooms from your local woods.
Nope, when I go mushroom gathering I take a leading expert who lives down the road with me to identify and approve of each mushroom before I pick it. I don't even know what psilocybin mushrooms are and can't be bothered to look it up as I'm apparently less interested in drugs than you are.
You clearly don't understand the role of US judges or justices in interpreting the 14th Amendment,
That a junior high school (and not a very good school either) argument to tell me I don't understand something, thereby to imply that you do, and then not to offer to explain. It make you look stupid for not knowing that I would catch on and expose your cheap trick.
which is not surprising coming from a country with no written constitution
Everyone who grasps how the senior anglophone democracies, and latterly the EU, works, knows we have a constitution and that it is indeed written down in Strasbourg or Brussels or somewhere. I haven't asked where because there are no shysters quibbling about it.
-- and where abortion is both legal
Yup. We have our own pinko-commie-fellow-traveller dimbos and hoes, and they all have a vote, just like people. The good people foolishly let that one slip by staying home on the since disproven assumption that no one would vote for abortion. (Me too. I should have bestirred myself and my neighbours to go vote.)

and free.

Try collecting on that promise if you aren't actually indigent! Man, you should keep your nose out of what you clearly don't understand. Your view of socialised medicine in Ireland is one huge cliche of outright errors, leading you by erroneous assumption into stupid remarks like that one. The Health Service in Ireland has only superficial points of resemblance to the one in the UK; as a consequence is it noticeably more efficient.

-- Jay Beattie.

Always glad to hear from you, Jay. Tell us, are you so sour and prissy because you fear that Mr Trump will be reelected, or because you know that if Mr Biden is elected, the next day we will ask you, "What the have you done to your country?" -- and you will have no answer?

Psilocybin mushrooms are pretty clearly something that Jay has had great experience with since he continually is off on a "trip" bragging on how he has paid the legally required Social Security and Medicare funds for his employees as if he had a choice. He also decided that although he is considerably younger than I am he has paid more quarters of social security than I did. This despite my saying that I once calculated that I would be 92 years old before I broke even with Social Security.
At least I'm not jacked up on Haldol or whatever anti-psychotic you're on. My point was that I'm supporting you. I have put far more into the SS trust than you. I pay the employer's side for a fleet of employees and both sides for myself. My dollar contributions dwarf yours -- and you're sucking the trust dry. Tom the ubermensch SS welfare queen. Current contributors to Socialist Security are supporting you, comrade. Embrace socialism.
Again with the ****. What you are required to pay for your employees DOES NOT COUNT as you paying into your own SS. You are paying for nothing and bragging about it. I have to admit that the psychotic comments from you are entertaining even through they are all screwed up.
Do you suppose that I should be counting all of the social security and Medicare donations made to the Government because it was me and not someone else working for these companies?

On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 8:01:43 PM UTC-4, news18 wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:03:11 -0700, Mark Cleary wrote:


-- Jay Beattie.
Going to jump in on this one. Judge Barrett has all the credentials

but sadly, very little experience,

That's BS. She has comparatively very extensive experience. Contrast her experience with these notably well-known justices at the time of their appointments:

John Marshall, Lewis Powell Jr., Earl Warren, William Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, William Rehnquist, Louis Brandeis.

Also check out Elena Kagan.

On 10/15/2020 9:32 AM, 2wheelfan wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2020 at 8:01:43 PM UTC-4, news18 wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:03:11 -0700, Mark Cleary wrote:


-- Jay Beattie.
Going to jump in on this one. Judge Barrett has all the credentials

but sadly, very little experience,

That's BS. She has comparatively very extensive experience. Contrast her experience with these notably well-known justices at the time of their appointments:

John Marshall, Lewis Powell Jr., Earl Warren, William Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, William Rehnquist, Louis Brandeis.

Also check out Elena Kagan.


Earl Warren ran FDR's pogrom against American citizens with
Japanese names. So, naturally rewarded for his party loyalty.

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971